Skip to content

CGRO vs FLCH

CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF

CGRODNYSE Arca

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCHANYSE Arca

Overlap

17.2%by weight

Expense ratio

FLCH −0.70pt a year

CGRO0.89%FLCH0.19%

Avg volume · 30D

FLCH 182.4×the volume

CGRO594FLCH108K

3Y return · a year

FLCH +7.4pt

CGRO+1.4%FLCH+8.8%

CGRO vs FLCH Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−33.0%CGRO−20.9%FLCH

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CGRO −33.0%. FLCH −20.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CGRO 0.89%
FLCH 0.19%, better
Fund size
CGRO $2M
FLCH $252M
1Y total return
CGRO −33.0%
FLCH −20.9%, better
Yield (12M)
CGRO 31.75%, better
FLCH 2.63%
Holdings
CGRO 31
FLCH 1112
Avg volume (30D)
CGRO 594 sh
FLCH 108K sh, better
NAV per share
CGRO $15.46
FLCH $19.38
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CGRO: Cost 10, Risk 28, Mission 79, Tradability 30, Holdings 31, Durability 27. FLCH: Cost 100, Risk 64, Mission 87, Tradability 62, Holdings 65, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for CGRO, FLCH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCGROFLCH
Cost30% weightF10A100Higher
Mission25% weightA79A87Higher
Risk15% weightD28B64Higher
Tradability15% weightD30B62Higher
Holdings10% weightD31B65Higher
Durability5% weightD27A70Higher

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CGRO and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

FLCH ranks 2nd and CGRO 24th of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 24DCASSimplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETFScore 35
  5. Rank 24DCGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETFScore 35
  6. Rank 26DCNQQRayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CGRODCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF

FLCHAFranklin FTSE China ETF

In short

CGRO Most China ETFs hand you an index and hundreds of tickers. CGRO goes the other way: a concentrated 30-to-40 stock book, built from top-down sector calls across the mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan, at 0.89%.

FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.

Stated mandate

CGRO The fund primarily invests in equity securities of growth companies with exposure to the economies of Greater China.

FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

Why people hold it

  • CGRO Active in the real sense: the team ranks Greater China sectors by growth potential first, then picks the stocks, landing on 30 to 40 names instead of an index roster.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • "Greater China" here covers the mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan, and the screen is revenue-based (companies with above 15% of sales from the region), not listing-based.cvafunds.comsec.gov
  • Reaches mainland A-shares directly through Stock Connect alongside ADRs and Hong Kong listings, so it is not boxed into a single listing venue.sec.govcvafunds.com
  • FLCH 0.19% a year, against a roughly 0.70% median for China funds. It also undercuts the category stalwarts MCHI and GXC, both at 0.59%.
  • About 1,000 holdings, so you own the long tail of Chinese listings rather than a short list of mega-cap headline names.
  • One job, done tightly: mirror the FTSE China RIC Capped Index before fees. On tracking it ranks among the strongest builds in its China peer group.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • CGRO At 0.89% the fee sits above the China-fund median; index-tracking peers come cheaper, FLCH at 0.19% and CXSE at 0.32%.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, so spreads can widen and bigger orders can move the price more than in the category's giants.
  • Non-diversified by design: a handful of positions can drive results, and single-country China exposure carries policy and currency swings.sec.gov
  • FLCH It is China or nothing. Policy shifts, regulatory news and the currency drive the ride, with no other market in the basket to cushion it.
  • Mid-sized and only moderately traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can bite more on larger orders.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly. This is an equity index vehicle, not an income schedule.

Full CGRO profile⁠

Full FLCH profile⁠

CGRO vs FLCH Holdings

How CGRO and FLCH differ

Overlap by weight

17.2%

Shared holdings make up 59.8% of CGRO and 21.0% of FLCH.

Level by level

  • Holdings17 in both17.2%
  • Sector11 Sectors60.9%
  • Countryby domicile93.9%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CGRO and FLCH, widest gap first
SectorMore in CGROMore in FLCH
Consumer DiscretionaryCGRO +25.9 points
FinancialsFLCH +16.7 points
CommunicationFLCH +7.6 points
TechnologyCGRO +6.6 points
MaterialsFLCH +5.5 points
IndustrialsCGRO +5.3 points
EnergyFLCH +3.5 points
Consumer StaplesFLCH +3.3 points
UtilitiesFLCH +1.9 points
Health CareCGRO +1.2 points
Real EstateFLCH +0.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CGRO and FLCH, widest gap first
CountryMore in CGROMore in FLCH
ChinaFLCH +5.6 points
United StatesCGRO +3.4 points
Hong KongCGRO +2.7 points
Other countries (3)FLCH +0.5 points

Outside the US: CGRO 5% developed, 95% emerging. FLCH 2% developed, 98% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CGRO63.7%
  • FLCH39.3%

Securities held

  • CGRO30
  • FLCH1,109

Asset class

CGRO
Equity
FLCH
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CGRO13
  • In both17
  • Only in FLCH1,092

Only in CGRO

13 securities, 40.2% of CGRO by weight

  • Alibaba Group Holding Ltd9.82%
  • Luckin Coffee Inc7.98%
  • Tesla Inc4.71%

Only in FLCH

1,092 securities, 79.0% of FLCH by weight

  • Alibaba Group Holding Ltd8.88%
  • China Construction Bank-H4.38%
  • Ind & Comm Bk of China-H3.04%

Weight gaps

All 17 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CGRO and FLCH, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CGROMore in FLCH
WuXi AppTec Co LtdCGRO +7.34 points
Anker Innovations Technology Co LtdCGRO +5.96 points
J&T Global Express LtdCGRO +5.39 points
Yutong Bus Co LtdCGRO +4.33 points
Tencent Holdings LtdFLCH +3.78 points
Xiaomi CorpCGRO +3.24 points
UBTech Robotics Corp LtdCGRO +3.20 points
MeituanCGRO +2.55 points

All 32 CGRO holdings⁠All 967 FLCH holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CGRO vs FLCH Cost

Overpaying CGRO vs FLCH

$12,920

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CGRO 0.89%

    $16,872

  • FLCH 0.19%

    $3,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CGRO 0.89%
  • FLCH 0.19%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530CGRO $16,872FLCH $3,952

Year by year

YearCGROFLCHOverpaying
10$1,576$347$1,229
20$5,953$1,351$4,602
30$16,872$3,952$12,920

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%CGRO
  • 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

FLCH cheapest of 28 funds

CGRO 24th cheapest of 28 funds

CGRO vs FLCH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CGRO 31.75%, better
FLCH 2.63%
Payout (12M)
CGRO $4.92
FLCH $0.51
Last payment
CGRO $4.17
FLCH $0.14
Ex-dividend
CGRO Sep 29, 2026
FLCH Jun 26, 2026
Paid on
CGRO Sep 30, 2026
FLCH Jul 6, 2026
Frequency
CGRO Twice a year
FLCH Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CGROTwice a year · 5 paymentsAll CGRO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.04; Dec 23, 2024 $0.57; Dec 29, 2025 $0.67; Mar 25, 2026 $0.08; Sep 29, 2026 $4.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
FLCHTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLCH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.00084; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.29; Jun 11, 2019 $0.03; Dec 11, 2019 $0.46; Jun 11, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.25; Jun 10, 2021 $0.03; Dec 13, 2021 $0.34; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Dec 16, 2022 $0.36; Jun 16, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.37; Jun 21, 2024 $0.12; Dec 20, 2024 $0.41; Jun 20, 2025 $0.19; Dec 19, 2025 $0.37; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

CGRO vs FLCH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CGRO 24.4%FLCH 21.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CGRO −0.01FLCH 0.29, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CGRO −38.0%since Oct 2023FLCH −48.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CGRO 0.24FLCH 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • CGRODvsCXSEA

    CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsCXSEA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGRODvsMCHIA

    CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsMCHIA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGRODvsGXCA

    CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsGXCA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.