CXSE ranks 1st and CGRO 24th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CGRO vs CXSE
25.2%by weight
CXSE −0.57pt a year
0.89%0.32%
CXSE 62.6×the volume
59437.2K
CXSE +3.3pt
+1.6%+4.9%
CGRO vs CXSE Performance
−32.1%−24.1%
- CGRO 0.89%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- CGRO $2M
- CXSE $372M
- CGRO −32.1%
- CXSE −24.1%, better
- CGRO 31.31%, better
- CXSE 2.20%
- CGRO 31
- CXSE 241
- CGRO 594 sh
- CXSE 37.2K sh, better
- CGRO $15.46
- CXSE $31.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGRO | CXSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D29 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | D31 | A74Higher |
| Durability | D27 | A79Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CGRO and CXSE are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGROD
CXSEA
In short
CGRO Most China ETFs hand you an index and hundreds of tickers. CGRO goes the other way: a concentrated 30-to-40 stock book, built from top-down sector calls across the mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan, at 0.89%.
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
Stated mandate
CGRO The fund primarily invests in equity securities of growth companies with exposure to the economies of Greater China.
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGRO vs CXSE Holdings
How CGRO and CXSE differ
25.2%
Shared holdings make up 58.0% of CGRO and 28.9% of CXSE.
Level by level
- Holdings25.2%
- Sector76.6%
- Country97.4%
Sector
| Sector | More in CGROMore in CXSE | CGRO | CXSE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | CGRO +21.9 points | 48.0% | 26.1% |
| Technology | CXSE +5.5 points | 17.9% | 23.4% |
| Consumer Staples | CXSE +4.6 points | 0.0% | 4.6% |
| Health Care | CXSE +4.0 points | 8.2% | 12.2% |
| Financials | CXSE +3.8 points | 3.2% | 7.0% |
| Materials | CXSE +3.2 points | 0.0% | 3.2% |
| Communication | CXSE +1.8 points | 8.9% | 10.7% |
| Industrials | CGRO +1.2 points | 12.6% | 11.4% |
| Energy | CXSE +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Real Estate | CGRO +0.3 points | 1.2% | 0.9% |
| Utilities | CXSE +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CGROMore in CXSE | CGRO | CXSE |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | CGRO +2.4 points | 4.8% | 2.4% |
| China | CXSE +2.2 points | 90.6% | 92.8% |
| Other countries (3) | CXSE +0.2 points | 4.6% | 4.8% |
Outside the US: CGRO 5% developed, 95% emerging. CXSE 5% developed, 95% emerging.
Concentration
- CGRO63.3%
- CXSE36.0%
- CGRO30
- CXSE236
Asset class
- CGRO
- Equity
- CXSE
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CGRO12
- In both18
- Only in CXSE218
Only in CGRO
12 securities, 42.1% of CGRO by weight
- Alibaba Group Holding Ltd10.03%
- Luckin Coffee Inc7.94%
- Anker Innovations Technology Co Ltd5.57%
- Tesla Inc4.69%
- Yutong Bus Co Ltd4.29%
- Netease Inc2.84%
- Futu Holdings Ltd1.75%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20311.48%
- NIO Inc1.40%
- KE Holdings Inc1.26%
- Hesai Group0.48%
- Trip.com Group0.35%
Only in CXSE
218 securities, 71.3% of CXSE by weight
- Alibaba Group Holding Ltd8.18%
- Zhongji Innolight Co Ltd-A2.94%
- Ping An Insurance Group Co of China2.36%
- Ping An Insurance Group Co of China1.60%
- Netease Inc1.42%
- Eoptolink Technology Inc L-A1.39%
- Cambricon Technologies-A1.34%
- Foxconn Industrial Internet Co1.05%
- Beigene Ltd1.03%
- Luxshare Precision Industry Co0.96%
- Montage Technology Co Ltd-A0.95%
- Trip.Com Group Ltd0.92%
- Wuxi Biologics Cayman Inc0.90%
- Baidu Inc-Class A0.90%
- Gigadevice Semiconductor Beiji0.88%
- BYD Co Ltd0.76%
- Innovent Biologics Inc0.73%
- Yum China Holdings Inc0.64%
- Suzhou Dongshan Precision-A0.62%
- Pop Mart International Group0.61%
- Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial0.60%
- Gree Electric Appliances Inc0.57%
- Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd0.55%
- ANTA Sports Products Ltd0.53%
- Wuxi Apptec Co Ltd-H0.53%
- Victory Giant Technology -A0.50%
- Kuaishou Technology0.49%
- Ke Holdings Inc-Cl A0.49%
- Muyuan Foodstuff Co Ltd0.49%
- Nongfu Spring Co Ltd-H0.47%
- Contemporary Amperex Techn-H0.45%
- Wus Printed Circuit Kunsha-A0.44%
- China Hongqiao Group Ltd0.44%
- Chaozhou Three-Circle Group-A0.44%
- Akeso Inc0.43%
- H World Group Ltd0.43%
- ZTO Express Cayman Inc0.41%
- SITC International Holdings Co0.40%
- Suzhou Tfc Optical Communi-A0.39%
- Genscript Biotech Corp0.38%
- Midea Group Co Ltd-H0.37%
- WH Group Ltd0.37%
- XPeng Inc - Class A Shares0.36%
- Yuanjie Semiconductor Tech-A0.36%
- Li Auto Inc-Class A0.36%
- Sunny Optical Technology Group Co Ltd0.36%
- Haier Smart Home Co Ltd-H0.35%
- Z Ai Co Ltd0.35%
- Nio Inc-Class A0.34%
- Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group0.34%
Weight gaps
All 18 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in CGROMore in CXSE | CGRO | CXSE |
|---|---|---|---|
| WuXi AppTec Co Ltd | CGRO +5.58 points | 7.21% | 1.63% |
| J&T Global Express Ltd | CGRO +5.20 points | 5.57% | 0.37% |
| Xiaomi Corp | CGRO +3.72 points | 5.69% | 1.97% |
| UBTech Robotics Corp Ltd | CGRO +3.05 points | 3.29% | 0.24% |
| Meituan | CGRO +2.77 points | 4.48% | 1.71% |
| Horizon Robotics | CGRO +2.33 points | 2.62% | 0.29% |
| Tencent Holdings Ltd | CXSE +2.13 points | 7.84% | 9.97% |
| Midea Group Co Ltd | CGRO +1.93 points | 3.71% | 1.78% |
| BYD Co Ltd | CGRO +1.63 points | 2.85% | 1.22% |
| Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd | CXSE +1.32 points | 2.04% | 3.36% |
| Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd | CGRO +1.31 points | 1.55% | 0.24% |
| JD.com Inc | CGRO +1.25 points | 2.41% | 1.16% |
| PDD Holdings Inc | CGRO +1.20 points | 3.26% | 2.06% |
| Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co Ltd | CGRO +0.95 points | 1.29% | 0.34% |
| Bilibili Inc | CGRO +0.68 points | 0.95% | 0.27% |
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | CGRO +0.66 points | 1.03% | 0.37% |
| East Money Information Co Ltd | CGRO +0.56 points | 1.44% | 0.88% |
| Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd | CGRO +0.01 points | 0.70% | 0.69% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGRO vs CXSE Cost
Overpaying CGRO vs CXSE
$10,330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGRO 0.89%
$16,872
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGRO | CXSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $580 | $996 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $2,250 | $3,703 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $6,542 | $10,330 |
- 0.89%CGRO
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
CGRO 24th cheapest of 28 funds
CGRO vs CXSE Dividends
- CGRO 31.31%, better
- CXSE 2.20%
- CGRO $4.92
- CXSE $0.69
- CGRO $4.17
- CXSE $0.26
- CGRO Sep 29, 2026
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- CGRO Sep 30, 2026
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- CGRO Twice a year
- CXSE Quarterly
Distribution history
CGRO vs CXSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGRO 24.4%, betterCXSE 24.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGRO −0.01CXSE 0.12, better
- Worst fall
- CGRO −38.0%CXSE −57.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CGRO 0.24CXSE 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.