MCHI ranks 3rd and CGRO 24th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CGRO vs MCHI
MCHI −0.30pt a year
0.89%0.59%
MCHI 3764.2×the volume
5942.24M
MCHI +6.7pt
+1.6%+8.3%
CGRO vs MCHI Performance
−32.1%−20.5%
- CGRO 0.89%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- CGRO $2M
- MCHI $5.49B
- CGRO −32.1%
- MCHI −20.5%, better
- CGRO 31.31%, better
- MCHI 2.21%
- CGRO 31
- MCHI 581
- CGRO 594 sh
- MCHI 2.24M sh, better
- CGRO $15.46
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGRO | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A87Higher |
| Risk | D29 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | D31 | B57Higher |
| Durability | D27 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CGRO and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGROD
MCHIA
In short
CGRO Most China ETFs hand you an index and hundreds of tickers. CGRO goes the other way: a concentrated 30-to-40 stock book, built from top-down sector calls across the mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan, at 0.89%.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
CGRO The fund primarily invests in equity securities of growth companies with exposure to the economies of Greater China.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGRO vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGRO vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying CGRO vs MCHI
$5,237
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGRO 0.89%
$16,872
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGRO | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,058 | $518 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $4,051 | $1,902 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $11,635 | $5,237 |
- 0.89%CGRO
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
CGRO 24th cheapest of 28 funds
CGRO vs MCHI Dividends
- CGRO 31.31%, better
- MCHI 2.21%
- CGRO $4.92
- MCHI $1.10
- CGRO $4.17
- MCHI $0.36
- CGRO Sep 29, 2026
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- CGRO Sep 30, 2026
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- CGRO Twice a year
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
CGRO vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGRO 24.4%MCHI 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CGRO −0.01MCHI 0.26, better
- Worst fall
- CGRO −38.0%MCHI −49.2%
- Market sensitivity
- CGRO 0.24MCHI 0.63
CGRO and MCHI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





