FLCH ranks 2nd and CHIQ 18th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CHIQ vs FLCH
FLCH −0.46pt a year
0.65%0.19%
FLCH 4.1×the volume
26.6K108K
FLCH +6.7pt
−10.8%−4.1%
CHIQ vs FLCH Performance
−43.6%−18.7%
- CHIQ 0.65%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- CHIQ $97M
- FLCH $252M
- CHIQ −31.7%
- FLCH −20.9%, better
- CHIQ 1.84%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- CHIQ 53
- FLCH 1112
- CHIQ 26.6K sh
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- CHIQ $15.58
- FLCH $19.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CHIQ | FLCH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | D27 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | B65Higher |
| Durability | A73Higher | A70 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CHIQ and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CHIQC
FLCHA
In short
CHIQ A 2009-vintage bet on the Chinese consumer, not the American one: roughly 60 Chinese consumer discretionary names in a peer group otherwise stacked with US retail and S&P 500 sector funds.
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
Stated mandate
CHIQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index.
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CHIQ vs FLCH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CHIQ vs FLCH Cost
Overpaying CHIQ vs FLCH
$8,765
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CHIQ 0.65%
$12,717
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CHIQ | FLCH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $347 | $816 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,351 | $3,089 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,952 | $8,765 |
- 0.65%CHIQ
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
CHIQ 11th cheapest of 28 funds
CHIQ vs FLCH Dividends
- CHIQ 1.84%
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- CHIQ $0.28
- FLCH $0.51
- CHIQ $0.09
- FLCH $0.14
- CHIQ Jun 29, 2026
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- CHIQ Jul 7, 2026
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- CHIQ Twice a year
- FLCH Twice a year
Distribution history
CHIQ vs FLCH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CHIQ
- FLCH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CHIQ 29.9%FLCH 21.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CHIQ −0.08FLCH 0.29, better
- Worst fall
- CHIQ −53.6%FLCH −48.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CHIQ 0.68FLCH 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.