CXSE ranks 1st and CHIQ 18th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CHIQ vs CXSE
CXSE −0.33pt a year
0.65%0.32%
CXSE 1.4×the volume
26.6K37.2K
CHIQ +1.2pt
+4.4%+3.2%
CHIQ vs CXSE Performance
−42.6%−37.6%
- CHIQ 0.65%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- CHIQ $97M
- CXSE $372M
- CHIQ −30.4%
- CXSE −24.1%, better
- CHIQ 1.80%
- CXSE 2.20%, better
- CHIQ 53
- CXSE 241
- CHIQ 26.6K sh
- CXSE 37.2K sh, better
- CHIQ $15.58
- CXSE $31.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CHIQ | CXSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D27 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A74Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A79Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CHIQ and CXSE are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CHIQC
CXSEA
In short
CHIQ A 2009-vintage bet on the Chinese consumer, not the American one: roughly 60 Chinese consumer discretionary names in a peer group otherwise stacked with US retail and S&P 500 sector funds.
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
Stated mandate
CHIQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index.
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CHIQ vs CXSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CHIQ vs CXSE Cost
Overpaying CHIQ vs CXSE
$6,175
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CHIQ 0.65%
$12,717
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CHIQ | CXSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $580 | $583 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,250 | $2,190 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $6,542 | $6,175 |
- 0.65%CHIQ
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
CHIQ 11th cheapest of 28 funds
CHIQ vs CXSE Dividends
- CHIQ 1.80%
- CXSE 2.20%, better
- CHIQ $0.28
- CXSE $0.69
- CHIQ $0.09
- CXSE $0.26
- CHIQ Jun 29, 2026
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- CHIQ Jul 7, 2026
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- CHIQ Twice a year
- CXSE Quarterly
Distribution history
CHIQ vs CXSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CHIQ
- CXSE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CHIQ 29.9%CXSE 24.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CHIQ −0.08CXSE 0.12, better
- Worst fall
- CHIQ −53.6%, betterCXSE −57.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CHIQ 0.68CXSE 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.