GXC ranks 4th and CHIQ 18th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CHIQ vs GXC
GXC −0.06pt a year
0.65%0.59%
CHIQ 1.1×the volume
26.6K23.4K
CHIQ +1.5pt
+4.4%+2.9%
CHIQ vs GXC Performance
−42.6%−16.4%
- CHIQ 0.65%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- CHIQ $97M
- GXC $421M
- CHIQ −30.4%
- GXC −18.4%, better
- CHIQ 1.80%
- GXC 2.44%, better
- CHIQ 53
- GXC 1539
- CHIQ 26.6K sh, better
- GXC 23.4K sh
- CHIQ $15.58
- GXC $80.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CHIQ | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | D27 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A84Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CHIQ and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CHIQC
GXCA
In short
CHIQ A 2009-vintage bet on the Chinese consumer, not the American one: roughly 60 Chinese consumer discretionary names in a peer group otherwise stacked with US retail and S&P 500 sector funds.
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
Stated mandate
CHIQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index.
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CHIQ vs GXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CHIQ vs GXC Cost
Overpaying CHIQ vs GXC
$1,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CHIQ 0.65%
$12,717
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CHIQ | GXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,058 | $105 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,051 | $389 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $11,635 | $1,082 |
- 0.65%CHIQ
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
CHIQ 11th cheapest of 28 funds
CHIQ vs GXC Dividends
- CHIQ 1.80%
- GXC 2.44%, better
- CHIQ $0.28
- GXC $1.99
- CHIQ $0.09
- GXC $0.67
- CHIQ Jun 29, 2026
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- CHIQ Jul 7, 2026
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- CHIQ Twice a year
- GXC Twice a year
Distribution history
CHIQ vs GXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CHIQ
- GXC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CHIQ 29.9%GXC 20.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CHIQ −0.08GXC 0.27, better
- Worst fall
- CHIQ −53.6%GXC −46.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CHIQ 0.68GXC 0.69
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.