CHPS vs DISK: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

CHPSANasdaq

Tema Memory ETF

DISKDNYSE Arca

Overlap

11.8%by weight

Expense ratio

CHPS −0.60pt a year

CHPS0.15%DISK0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

DISK 7.7×the volume

CHPS34.5KDISK266K

CHPS vs DISK Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−7.8%CHPS−16.5%DISK

Expense ratio: CHPS 0.15%, better; DISK 0.75%
Fund size: CHPS $130M; DISK $54M
1Y total return: CHPS +57.9%; DISK No data
Yield (12M): CHPS 0.42%; DISK No data
Holdings: CHPS 54; DISK 18
Avg volume (30D): CHPS 34.5K sh; DISK 266K sh, better
NAV per share: CHPS $75.55; DISK $29.47
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for CHPS, DISK, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	CHPS	DISK
Cost30% weight	A100Higher	F13
Mission25% weight	A70	Not scored
Risk15% weight	B56Higher	F15
Tradability15% weight	C50Higher	C46
Holdings10% weight	A88Higher	C42
Durability5% weight	A70Higher	C54

Rank among Semiconductors funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. CHPS and DISK are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Semiconductors⁠

Category · 25 funds

See all 25 ›

CHPS ranks 4th and DISK 17th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.

Rank 1ASOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETFScore 82
Rank 2ASMHVanEck Semiconductor ETFScore 78
Rank 2ASOXXiShares Semiconductor ETFScore 78
Rank 4ACHPSXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETFScore 77
Rank 5AXSDState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETFScore 71
Rank 16DHBMXTuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETFScore 27
Rank 17DDISKTema Memory ETFScore 26
AHBMNot yet graded
AIFRNot yet graded
AINFNot yet graded
CGPTNot yet graded
CRAMNot yet graded
KAITNot yet graded
KSMHNot yet graded
PSOXNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CHPSAXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

DISKDTema Memory ETF

In short

CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.

DISK No data

Stated mandate

CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.

DISK No data

Why people hold it

CHPS At 0.15%, one of the cheapest doors into chips. SMH and SOXX each charge more than double.
Global mandate, so foreign foundries and equipment makers are in scope, not just the US-listed marquee names.
The ESG screen sits inside the index itself: the chip universe gets filtered before the portfolio is built.
Simple plumbing. Roughly 50 holdings, one published index, cash paid out quarterly.

DISK No data

Worth knowing

CHPS Trades thinly next to SMH and SOXX. Spreads can be wider, and size takes more care to get filled.
Launched in 2023, so the record is short against chip funds that have lived through several boom-bust cycles.
The screen excludes some chip companies outright, so the lineup can look different from unscreened rivals.

DISK No data

Full CHPS profile⁠

Full DISK profile⁠

CHPS vs DISK Holdings

How CHPS and DISK differ

Overlap by weight

11.8%

Shared holdings make up 46.3% of DISK and 11.8% of CHPS.

Level by level

Holdings4 in both11.8%
Countryby domicile68.2%
Sector4 Sectors99.2%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CHPS and DISK, widest gap first
Sector	More in CHPSMore in DISK	CHPS	DISK
Technology	DISK +0.8 points	99.2%	100.0%
Industrials	CHPS +0.4 points	0.4%	0.0%
Energy	CHPS +0.4 points	0.4%	0.0%
Financials	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CHPS and DISK, widest gap first
Country	More in CHPSMore in DISK	CHPS	DISK
South Korea	DISK +23.9 points	5.2%	29.1%
United States	CHPS +22.7 points	62.5%	39.8%
Japan	DISK +6.4 points	10.4%	16.8%
Netherlands	CHPS +5.9 points	5.9%	0.0%
Germany	CHPS +1.6 points	1.6%	0.0%
China	DISK +1.5 points	1.3%	2.8%
Singapore	CHPS +0.7 points	0.7%	0.0%
Other countries (3)	CHPS +1.0 points	12.5%	11.5%

Outside the US: CHPS 50% developed, 50% emerging. DISK 28% developed, 72% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

CHPS47.4%
DISK86.5%

Securities held

CHPS53
DISK17

Asset class

CHPS: Equity
DISK: Equity

Holdings

Only in CHPS49
In both4
Only in DISK13

Only in CHPS

49 securities, 88.2% of CHPS by weight

NVIDIA Corp5.34%
Texas Instruments Inc5.31%
Advanced Micro Dev5.20%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing4.95%
ASML Holding NV4.81%
Broadcom4.46%
Analog Devices Inc4.44%
MediaTek Inc3.86%
Lam Research Corp3.82%
Kla-Tencor Corp3.81%
QUALCOMM Inc3.80%
Marvell Technology Group Ltd3.76%
Applied Materials Inc3.64%
Advantest Corp3.50%
Intel Corp3.18%
Tokyo Electron Ltd2.98%
ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd1.69%
Infineon Technologies AG1.61%
NXP Semiconductors NV1.44%
Te Connectivity Ltd1.37%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc1.26%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co Ltd1.08%
Teradyne Inc0.94%
Microchip Technology Inc0.90%
Coherent Corp0.90%
United Microelectronics Corp0.87%
ASM International NV0.83%
Astera Labs Inc0.76%
STMicroelectronics NV0.67%
Renesas Electronics Corp0.65%
ON Semiconductor Corp0.61%
Disco Corp0.60%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.55%
Entegris Inc0.52%
Arm Holdings PLC Ads0.45%
Tower Semiconductor Ltd0.43%
VAT Group AG0.41%
Lasertec Corp0.41%
First Solar Inc0.40%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings0.33%
MKS Instruments Inc0.28%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp0.28%
BE Semiconductor Indstries NV0.27%
MPI Corporation0.26%
Fabrinet0.25%
Screen Holdings Co0.24%
Taiwan Semiconductor-Sp Adr0.08%
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF0.03%
STMicroelectronics NV EUR 1.04 ADR<0.01%

Only in DISK

13 securities, 53.7% of DISK by weight

Sandisk Corp16.64%
Changxin Memory Technologies-Swap-Mrex-L5.95%
Sk Square Co Ltd5.03%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd5.03%
Winbond Electronics Corp3.98%
Western Digital Corp3.87%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC3.81%
Aehr Test Systems3.45%
Shenzhen Techwinsemi Technology Co Ltd1.47%
Innodisk Corp1.32%
Biwin Storage Technology Co Ltd1.28%
Macronix International Co Ltd1.17%
Sk Hynix Inc0.75%

Weight gaps

All 4 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CHPS and DISK, widest gap first
Holding	More in CHPSMore in DISK	CHPS	DISK
Kioxia Holdings Corp	DISK +13.74 points	2.16%	15.90%
SK Hynix Inc	DISK +12.89 points	4.09%	16.98%
Nanya Technology Corp	DISK +4.06 points	0.44%	4.50%
Micron TechnologyMU	DISK +3.64 points	4.97%	8.61%

All 54 CHPS holdings⁠All 18 DISK holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CHPS vs DISK Cost

Overpaying DISK vs CHPS

$11,345

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

CHPS 0.15%
$3,137
DISK 0.75%
$14,482

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

CHPS 0.15%
DISK 0.75%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	CHPS	DISK	Overpaying
10	$274	$1,336	$1,062
20	$1,071	$5,078	$4,007
30	$3,137	$14,482	$11,345

Expense ratio

0.15%CHPS, cheaper
0.75%DISK

CHPS0.15%DISK0.75%

0.15%1.00%

Middle half of Semiconductors funds
Median 0.60%

CHPS cheapest of 25 funds

DISK 21st cheapest of 25 funds

CHPS vs DISK Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026

Yield (12M): CHPS 0.42%; DISK No data
Payout (12M): CHPS $0.31; DISK None
Last payment: CHPS $0.10; DISK No data
Ex-dividend: CHPS Sep 18, 2026; DISK No data
Paid on: CHPS Sep 25, 2026; DISK No data
Frequency: CHPS Quarterly; DISK No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CHPSQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll CHPS payments⁠

DISKAll DISK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CHPS vs DISK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: CHPS 41.2%DISK No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: CHPS 1.12DISK No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: CHPS −39.4%since Jul 2023DISK No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: CHPS 2.16DISK 8.44; Market = 1

CHPS and DISK in the news

All news⁠

Top Movers
Memory-chip funds jump after SK hynix's record quarter as Israel funds fall
Oct 28, 2026DISK
News
CXMT says fifth-generation DRAM is in mass production, with 50% more gross dies per wafer
Sep 20, 2026DISK

Popular comparisons

CHPSAvsSOXQA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.19%
Category
DISKDvsSOXQA
Tema Memory ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.19%
Category
CHPSAvsSMHA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.35%
Category
DISKDvsSMHA
Tema Memory ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.35%
Category
CHPSAvsSOXXA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.33%
Category
DISKDvsSOXXA
Tema Memory ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.33%
Category

CHPS vs DISK

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How CHPS and DISK differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in CHPS

Only in DISK

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Memory-chip funds jump after SK hynix's record quarter as Israel funds fall

CXMT says fifth-generation DRAM is in mass production, with 50% more gross dies per wafer