CHPS vs FTXL: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

CHPSANasdaq

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF

FTXLBNasdaq

Overlap

56.2%by weight

Expense ratio

CHPS −0.45pt a year

CHPS0.15%FTXL0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

FTXL 6.7×the volume

CHPS34.5KFTXL232K

3Y return · a year

CHPS +1.8pt

CHPS+52.3%FTXL+50.5%

CHPS vs FTXL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+61.5%CHPS+67.8%FTXL

Expense ratio: CHPS 0.15%, better; FTXL 0.60%
Fund size: CHPS $130M; FTXL $1.08B
1Y total return: CHPS +61.5%; FTXL +67.8%, better
Yield (12M): CHPS 0.41%, better; FTXL 0.08%
Holdings: CHPS 54; FTXL 38
Avg volume (30D): CHPS 34.5K sh; FTXL 232K sh, better
NAV per share: CHPS $75.55; FTXL $211.17
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for CHPS, FTXL, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	CHPS	FTXL
Cost30% weight	A100Higher	C50
Mission25% weight	A70	Not scored
Risk15% weight	B56Higher	C45
Tradability15% weight	C49	A88Higher
Holdings10% weight	A88Higher	A81
Durability5% weight	A70	A82Higher

Rank among Semiconductors funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. CHPS and FTXL are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Semiconductors⁠

Category · 25 funds

See all 25 ›

CHPS ranks 4th and FTXL 10th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.

Rank 1ASOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETFScore 82
Rank 2ASMHVanEck Semiconductor ETFScore 79
Rank 3ASOXXiShares Semiconductor ETFScore 78
Rank 4ACHPSXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETFScore 77
Rank 5AXSDState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETFScore 71
Rank 7BPSIInvesco Semiconductors ETFScore 64
Rank 10BFTXLFirst Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETFScore 62
Rank 11BSHOCStrive U.S. Semiconductor ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CHPSAXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

FTXLBFirst Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF

In short

CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.

FTXL Most chip ETFs rank by size. FTXL runs roughly 30 US semiconductor names through momentum and profitability screens instead, so the weighting ladder is built on factor scores rather than market cap alone.

Stated mandate

CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.

FTXL The Fund seeks to track the Nasdaq US Smart Semiconductor Index before fees and expenses. The index provides exposure to U.S. semiconductor companies and uses a modified factor-weighting methodology.

Why people hold it

CHPS At 0.15%, one of the cheapest doors into chips. SMH and SOXX each charge more than double.
Global mandate, so foreign foundries and equipment makers are in scope, not just the US-listed marquee names.
The ESG screen sits inside the index itself: the chip universe gets filtered before the portfolio is built.
Simple plumbing. Roughly 50 holdings, one published index, cash paid out quarterly.

FTXL The tracked index screens on momentum and profitability, so position sizes follow factor scores instead of sheer market cap.ftportfolios.com
Roughly 30 US chip stocks and nothing else: a concentrated, straight-through read on semiconductors rather than a broad tech basket.
Live since 2016 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund with moderate trading activity, it is one of the longer-running factor takes on the sector.
Pays distributions quarterly, in line with the sector's typically modest dividend profile.

Worth knowing

CHPS Trades thinly next to SMH and SOXX. Spreads can be wider, and size takes more care to get filled.
Launched in 2023, so the record is short against chip funds that have lived through several boom-bust cycles.
The screen excludes some chip companies outright, so the lineup can look different from unscreened rivals.

FTXL At 0.60% a year, it costs more than several chip rivals: SOXQ at 0.19%, CHPS at 0.15%, SOXX at 0.33%.
Factor weighting means the lineup can look quite different from a cap-weighted chip index, and that gap cuts both ways.
About 30 stocks in one cyclical industry: moves are sharper than a diversified fund's, up and down.

Full CHPS profile⁠

Full FTXL profile⁠

CHPS vs FTXL Holdings

How CHPS and FTXL differ

Overlap by weight

56.2%

Shared holdings make up 83.1% of FTXL and 58.8% of CHPS.

Level by level

Holdings22 in both56.2%
Countryby domicile62.5%
Asset classEquity100%
Sector4 Sectors99.6%

Sector

Sector weights in CHPS and FTXL, widest gap first
Sector	More in CHPSMore in FTXL	CHPS	FTXL
Energy	CHPS +0.4 points	0.4%	0.0%
Technology	FTXL +0.3 points	99.2%	99.5%
Industrials	FTXL +0.1 points	0.4%	0.5%
Financials	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CHPS and FTXL, widest gap first
Country	More in CHPSMore in FTXL	CHPS	FTXL
United States	FTXL +37.5 points	62.5%	100.0%
Taiwan	CHPS +11.6 points	11.6%	0.0%
Japan	CHPS +10.4 points	10.4%	0.0%
Netherlands	CHPS +5.9 points	5.9%	0.0%
South Korea	CHPS +5.2 points	5.2%	0.0%
Germany	CHPS +1.6 points	1.6%	0.0%
China	CHPS +1.3 points	1.3%	0.0%
Singapore	CHPS +0.7 points	0.7%	0.0%
Other countries (2)	CHPS +0.8 points	0.8%	0.0%

Outside the US: CHPS 50% developed, 50% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

CHPS47.4%
FTXL60.0%

Securities held

CHPS53
FTXL37

Asset class

CHPS: Equity
FTXL: Equity

Holdings

Only in CHPS31
In both22
Only in FTXL15

Only in CHPS

31 securities, 41.1% of CHPS by weight

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing4.95%
ASML Holding NV4.81%
SK Hynix Inc4.09%
MediaTek Inc3.86%
Advantest Corp3.50%
Tokyo Electron Ltd2.98%
Kioxia Holdings Corp2.16%
ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd1.69%
Infineon Technologies AG1.61%
NXP Semiconductors NV1.44%
Te Connectivity Ltd1.37%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co Ltd1.08%
United Microelectronics Corp0.87%
ASM International NV0.83%
STMicroelectronics NV0.67%
Renesas Electronics Corp0.65%
Disco Corp0.60%
Arm Holdings PLC Ads0.45%
Nanya Technology Corp0.44%
Tower Semiconductor Ltd0.43%
VAT Group AG0.41%
Lasertec Corp0.41%
First Solar Inc0.40%
MKS Instruments Inc0.28%
BE Semiconductor Indstries NV0.27%
MPI Corporation0.26%
Fabrinet0.25%
Screen Holdings Co0.24%
Taiwan Semiconductor-Sp Adr0.08%
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF0.03%
STMicroelectronics NV EUR 1.04 ADR<0.01%

Only in FTXL

15 securities, 16.7% of FTXL by weight

NXP Semiconductors N.V.4.83%
Amkor Technology, Inc.3.25%
Cirrus Logic, Inc.1.78%
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.0.94%
Rambus Inc.0.93%
Diodes Incorporated0.66%
Onto Innovation Inc.0.62%
Avnet, Inc.0.53%
Semtech Corporation0.52%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.0.49%
AXT, Inc.0.49%
FormFactor, Inc.0.47%
Adeia Inc.0.46%
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.0.39%
ACM Research, Inc. (Class A)0.34%

Weight gaps

All 22 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CHPS and FTXL, widest gap first
Holding	More in CHPSMore in FTXL	CHPS	FTXL
QUALCOMM IncQCOM	FTXL +4.28 points	3.80%	8.08%
ON Semiconductor CorpON	FTXL +3.43 points	0.61%	4.04%
Intel CorpINTC	FTXL +2.96 points	3.18%	6.14%
BroadcomAVGO	FTXL +2.90 points	4.46%	7.36%
Micron TechnologyMU	FTXL +2.74 points	4.97%	7.71%
Microchip Technology IncMCHP	FTXL +2.51 points	0.90%	3.41%
NVIDIA CorpNVDA	FTXL +2.41 points	5.34%	7.75%
Entegris IncENTG	FTXL +2.22 points	0.52%	2.74%
Teradyne IncTER	FTXL +1.70 points	0.94%	2.64%
Advanced Micro DevAMD	CHPS +0.72 points	5.20%	4.48%
Monolithic Power Systems IncMPWR	FTXL +0.69 points	1.26%	1.95%
Lam Research CorpLRCX	CHPS +0.51 points	3.82%	3.31%
Coherent CorpCOHR	CHPS +0.49 points	0.90%	0.41%
Texas Instruments IncTXN	CHPS +0.49 points	5.31%	4.82%
Analog Devices IncADI	FTXL +0.37 points	4.44%	4.81%
MACOM Technology Solutions HoldingsMTSI	FTXL +0.27 points	0.33%	0.60%
Astera Labs IncALAB	CHPS +0.24 points	0.76%	0.52%
Lattice Semiconductor CorpLSCC	FTXL +0.15 points	0.28%	0.43%
Credo Technology Group Holding LtdCRDO	FTXL +0.16 points	0.55%	0.71%
Marvell Technology Group LtdMRVL	FTXL +0.12 points	3.76%	3.88%
Applied Materials IncAMAT	CHPS +0.08 points	3.64%	3.56%
Kla-Tencor CorpKLAC	CHPS +0.05 points	3.81%	3.76%

All 54 CHPS holdings⁠All 37 FTXL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CHPS vs FTXL Cost

Overpaying FTXL vs CHPS

$8,680

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

CHPS 0.15%
$3,137
FTXL 0.60%
$11,817

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

CHPS 0.15%
FTXL 0.60%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	CHPS	FTXL	Overpaying
10	$274	$1,076	$802
20	$1,071	$4,116	$3,045
30	$3,137	$11,817	$8,680

Expense ratio

0.15%CHPS, cheaper
0.60%FTXL

CHPS0.15%FTXL0.60%

0.15%1.00%

Middle half of Semiconductors funds
Median 0.60%

CHPS cheapest of 25 funds

FTXL 13th cheapest of 25 funds

CHPS vs FTXL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): CHPS 0.41%, better; FTXL 0.08%
Payout (12M): CHPS $0.31; FTXL $0.17
Last payment: CHPS $0.10; FTXL $0.04
Ex-dividend: CHPS Sep 18, 2026; FTXL Jun 25, 2026
Paid on: CHPS Sep 25, 2026; FTXL Jun 30, 2026
Frequency: CHPS Quarterly; FTXL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CHPSQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll CHPS payments⁠

FTXLQuarterly · 38 paymentsAll FTXL payments⁠

CHPS vs FTXL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: CHPS 41.2%FTXL 41.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: CHPS 1.12, betterFTXL 1.09
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: CHPS −39.4%since Jul 2023FTXL −43.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: CHPS 2.16FTXL 2.30; Market = 1

CHPS and FTXL in the news

All news⁠

Deep Dive
AMD and Micron lifted chip funds. Equipment still lost the week
Sep 19, 2026FTXL

Popular comparisons

CHPSAvsSOXQA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.19%
Category
FTXLBvsSOXQA
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.19%
Category
CHPSAvsSMHA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.35%
Category
FTXLBvsSMHA
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.35%
Category
CHPSAvsSOXXA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.33%
Category
FTXLBvsSOXXA
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.60% · 0.33%
Category

CHPS vs FTXL

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How CHPS and FTXL differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in CHPS

Only in FTXL

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

AMD and Micron lifted chip funds. Equipment still lost the week

How CHPS and FTXL differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in CHPS

Only in FTXL

Weight gaps