CHPS ranks 4th and DRAM 12th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.
CHPS vs DRAM
CHPS −0.50pt a year
0.15%0.65%
DRAM 1427.5×the volume
34.5K49.2M
CHPS vs DRAM Performance
−5.7%−4.7%
- CHPS 0.15%, better
- DRAM 0.65%
- CHPS $130M
- DRAM $19B
- CHPS +61.5%
- DRAM
- CHPS 0.41%
- DRAM
- CHPS 54
- DRAM 23
- CHPS 34.5K sh
- DRAM 49.2M sh, better
- CHPS $75.55
- DRAM $49.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CHPS | DRAM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | B56Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | C49 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | F21 |
| Durability | A70 | A77Higher |
Rank among Semiconductors funds
Same Category. CHPS and DRAM are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CHPSA
DRAMC
In short
CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.
DRAM Most chip ETFs own memory in passing. DRAM makes it the whole point: an actively managed, global basket of companies that earn at least half their money from memory technology like HBM, DRAM and NAND.
Stated mandate
CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.
DRAM DRAM is an actively managed ETF investing primarily in equity securities of memory companies. Eligible companies derive at least half of their revenues or profits from semiconductor memory technologies such as HBM, DRAM, NAND, NOR, HDD, or specialty and embedded memory.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CHPS vs DRAM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CHPS vs DRAM Cost
Overpaying DRAM vs CHPS
$9,580
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CHPS 0.15%
$3,137
DRAM 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CHPS | DRAM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $1,163 | $889 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $4,440 | $3,369 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $12,717 | $9,580 |
- 0.15%CHPS, cheaper
- 0.65%DRAM
- Middle half of Semiconductors funds
- Median 0.60%
CHPS cheapest of 25 funds
DRAM 14th cheapest of 25 funds
CHPS vs DRAM Dividends
- CHPS 0.41%
- DRAM
- CHPS $0.31
- DRAM None
- CHPS $0.10
- DRAM
- CHPS Sep 18, 2026
- DRAM
- CHPS Sep 25, 2026
- DRAM
- CHPS Quarterly
- DRAM
Distribution history
CHPS vs DRAM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CHPS 41.2%DRAM
- Return per unit of risk
- CHPS 1.12DRAM
- Worst fall
- CHPS −39.4%DRAM
- Market sensitivity
- CHPS 2.16DRAM 9.20
CHPS and DRAM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





