Skip to content

CHPS vs DRAM

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

CHPSANasdaq

Roundhill Memory ETF

DRAMCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CHPS −0.50pt a year

CHPS0.15%DRAM0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

DRAM 1427.5×the volume

CHPS34.5KDRAM49.2M

CHPS vs DRAM Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−5.7%CHPS−4.7%DRAM

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CHPS −5.7%. DRAM −4.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CHPS 0.15%, better
DRAM 0.65%
Fund size
CHPS $130M
DRAM $19B
1Y total return
CHPS +61.5%
DRAM No data
Yield (12M)
CHPS 0.41%
DRAM No data
Holdings
CHPS 54
DRAM 23
Avg volume (30D)
CHPS 34.5K sh
DRAM 49.2M sh, better
NAV per share
CHPS $75.55
DRAM $49.23
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CHPS: Cost 100, Risk 56, Mission 70, Tradability 49, Holdings 88, Durability 70. DRAM: Cost 38, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 21, Durability 77.
Pillar letters and Scores for CHPS, DRAM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCHPSDRAM
Cost30% weightA100HigherD38
Mission25% weightA70Not scored
Risk15% weightB56HigherC42
Tradability15% weightC49B58Higher
Holdings10% weightA88HigherF21
Durability5% weightA70A77Higher

Rank among Semiconductors funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CHPS and DRAM are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Semiconductors⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

CHPS ranks 4th and DRAM 12th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.

  1. Rank 1ASOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2ASMHVanEck Semiconductor ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 3ASOXXiShares Semiconductor ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 4ACHPSXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETFScore 77
  5. Rank 5AXSDState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETFScore 71
  6. Rank 11BSHOCStrive U.S. Semiconductor ETFScore 61
  7. Rank 12CDRAMRoundhill Memory ETFScore 43
  8. Rank 13CARMHArm Holdings PLC ADRhedgedScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CHPSAXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

DRAMCRoundhill Memory ETF

In short

CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.

DRAM Most chip ETFs own memory in passing. DRAM makes it the whole point: an actively managed, global basket of companies that earn at least half their money from memory technology like HBM, DRAM and NAND.

Stated mandate

CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.

DRAM DRAM is an actively managed ETF investing primarily in equity securities of memory companies. Eligible companies derive at least half of their revenues or profits from semiconductor memory technologies such as HBM, DRAM, NAND, NOR, HDD, or specialty and embedded memory.

Why people hold it

  • CHPS At 0.15%, one of the cheapest doors into chips. SMH and SOXX each charge more than double.
  • Global mandate, so foreign foundries and equipment makers are in scope, not just the US-listed marquee names.
  • The ESG screen sits inside the index itself: the chip universe gets filtered before the portfolio is built.
  • Simple plumbing. Roughly 50 holdings, one published index, cash paid out quarterly.
  • DRAM A purity screen with teeth: to qualify, a company must derive at least half its revenue or profit from memory tech (HBM, DRAM, NAND, NOR, HDD, embedded), so the theme stays undiluted.roundhillinvestments.com
  • Actively managed and global in reach, so the roster can shift across the memory supply chain as conditions change rather than waiting on an index reconstitution calendar.roundhillinvestments.com
  • Straightforward plumbing: a 1940 Act equity fund holding stocks, not a leveraged or commodity-style wrapper, so no K-1 and no daily reset math to track.roundhillinvestments.com

Worth knowing

  • CHPS Trades thinly next to SMH and SOXX. Spreads can be wider, and size takes more care to get filled.
  • Launched in 2023, so the record is short against chip funds that have lived through several boom-bust cycles.
  • The screen excludes some chip companies outright, so the lineup can look different from unscreened rivals.
  • DRAM Costs 0.65% a year, roughly double the typical semiconductor ETF. Broad chip funds such as SOXX and SMH already hold the big memory names for a fraction of that.
  • It is one narrow slice of the chip world. The half-revenue test keeps the lineup small and concentrated, which can mean sharper swings than a diversified semiconductor fund.
  • A 2026 launch, so there is little history to judge it by, and it has not been paying distributions, meaning any return has to come from share price.

Full CHPS profile⁠

Full DRAM profile⁠

CHPS vs DRAM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CHPS vs DRAM Cost

Overpaying DRAM vs CHPS

$9,580

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CHPS 0.15%

    $3,137

  • DRAM 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CHPS 0.15%
  • DRAM 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530DRAM $12,717CHPS $3,137

Year by year

YearCHPSDRAMOverpaying
10$274$1,163$889
20$1,071$4,440$3,369
30$3,137$12,717$9,580

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%CHPS, cheaper
  • 0.65%DRAM
  • Middle half of Semiconductors funds
  • Median 0.60%

CHPS cheapest of 25 funds

DRAM 14th cheapest of 25 funds

CHPS vs DRAM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CHPS 0.41%
DRAM No data
Payout (12M)
CHPS $0.31
DRAM None
Last payment
CHPS $0.10
DRAM No data
Ex-dividend
CHPS Sep 18, 2026
DRAM No data
Paid on
CHPS Sep 25, 2026
DRAM No data
Frequency
CHPS Quarterly
DRAM No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CHPSQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll CHPS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 15, 2023 $0.02; Dec 15, 2023 $0.08; Mar 15, 2024 $0.05; Jun 21, 2024 $0.07; Sep 20, 2024 $0.10; Dec 6, 2024 $0.22; Dec 20, 2024 $0.08; Mar 21, 2025 $0.06; Jun 20, 2025 $0.08; Sep 19, 2025 $0.10; Dec 19, 2025 $0.08; Mar 20, 2026 $0.05; Jun 18, 2026 $0.07; Sep 18, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
DRAMAll DRAM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CHPS vs DRAM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CHPS 41.2%DRAM No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CHPS 1.12DRAM No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CHPS −39.4%since Jul 2023DRAM No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CHPS 2.16DRAM 9.20

CHPS and DRAM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CHPSAvsSOXQA

    Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DRAMCvsSOXQA

    Roundhill Memory ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CHPSAvsSMHA

    Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DRAMCvsSMHA

    Roundhill Memory ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CHPSAvsSOXXA

    Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DRAMCvsSOXXA

    Roundhill Memory ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.