Skip to content
etf.net

CIFC vs ROM

Corgi CIFR 2x Daily ETF

CIFCCCboe

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CIFC −0.48pt a year

CIFC0.45%ROM0.93%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 2.0×the volume

CIFC24.6KROM50.3K

CIFC vs ROM Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−89.7%CIFC−20.2%ROM

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. CIFC −89.7%. ROM −20.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%0%20%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CIFC 0.45%, better
ROM 0.93%
Fund size
CIFC $0
ROM $962M
1Y total return
CIFC No data
ROM +23.8%
Yield (12M)
CIFC No data
ROM 0.03%
Holdings
CIFC 1
ROM 86
Avg volume (30D)
CIFC 24.6K sh
ROM 50.3K sh, better
NAV per share
CIFC $0.8700
ROM $110.30
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CIFC: Cost 86, Risk 6, Mission not scored, Tradability 14, Holdings not scored, Durability 11. ROM: Cost 70, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings 52, Durability 80.
Pillar letters and Scores for CIFC, ROM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCIFCROM
Cost30% weightA86HigherA70
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF6C49Higher
Tradability15% weightF14A88Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC52
Durability5% weightF11A80Higher

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CIFC and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and CIFC 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 76
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 70
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 35CQQQUDirexion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 37CCIFCCorgi CIFR 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 37CCOPZDefiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper Miners ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CIFCCCorgi CIFR 2x Daily ETF

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

In short

CIFC No data

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

Stated mandate

CIFC No data

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

Why people hold it

CIFC No data

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com

Worth knowing

CIFC No data

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.

Full CIFC profile⁠

Full ROM profile⁠

CIFC vs ROM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CIFC vs ROM Cost

Overpaying ROM vs CIFC

$8,498

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CIFC 0.45%

    $9,041

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CIFC 0.45%
  • ROM 0.93%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ROM $17,539CIFC $9,041

Year by year

YearCIFCROMOverpaying
10$812$1,644$832
20$3,128$6,199$3,071
30$9,041$17,539$8,498

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%CIFC, cheaper
  • 0.93%ROM
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

CIFC 3rd cheapest of 95 funds

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

CIFC vs ROM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
CIFC No data
ROM 0.03%
Payout (12M)
CIFC None
ROM $0.04
Last payment
CIFC No data
ROM $0.02
Ex-dividend
CIFC No data
ROM Mar 25, 2026
Paid on
CIFC No data
ROM Mar 31, 2026
Frequency
CIFC No data
ROM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CIFCAll CIFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

CIFC vs ROM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CIFC No dataROM 49.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CIFC No dataROM 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CIFC No dataROM −67.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CIFC 0.17ROM 3.09

Popular comparisons

  • CIFCCvsQLDA

    Corgi CIFR 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CIFCCvsUYGA

    Corgi CIFR 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CIFCCvsDDMB

    Corgi CIFR 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.