Skip to content

QLD vs ROM

ProShares Ultra QQQ

QLDANYSE Arca

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

QLD −0.04pt a year

QLD0.89%ROM0.93%

Avg volume · 30D

QLD 87.0×the volume

QLD4.15MROM47.7K

10Y return · a year

ROM +4.7pt

QLD+31.9%ROM+36.6%

QLD vs ROM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+97.9%QLD+126.1%ROM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. QLD +97.9%. ROM +126.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%0%50%200%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QLD 0.89%, better
ROM 0.93%
Fund size
QLD $13.3B
ROM $1.15B
1Y total return
QLD +10.7%
ROM +26.5%, better
Yield (12M)
QLD 0.15%, better
ROM 0.03%
Holdings
QLD 113
ROM 85
Avg volume (30D)
QLD 4.15M sh, better
ROM 47.7K sh
NAV per share
QLD $82.56
ROM $132.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QLD: Cost 72, Risk 66, Mission 95, Tradability 100, Holdings 72, Durability 81. ROM: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings not scored, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for QLD, ROM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQLDROM
Cost30% weightA72HigherA70
Mission25% weightA95Not scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherB56
Tradability15% weightA100HigherA88
Holdings10% weightA72Not scored
Durability5% weightA81A81

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QLD and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

QLD ranks 1st and ROM 3rd of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QLDAProShares Ultra QQQ

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

In short

QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

Stated mandate

QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

Why people hold it

  • QLD Costs 0.89% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (0.96% gross), below the leveraged-bull category median and under Ultra stablemates ROM (0.93%) and DDM (0.95%).
  • Hits its stated daily 2x mark with very little drift, one of the tighter implementations among the roughly 100 leveraged bull funds in its group.
  • A multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund, so entering and exiting rarely means hunting for the other side of the trade.
  • Trading since June 2006, which makes it one of the longest-running leveraged equity funds on the US shelf rather than a recent product-shelf experiment.
  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com

Worth knowing

  • QLD The 2x objective covers one day only. Hold longer and daily resets plus compounding can push results away from twice the index's move over that stretch, in either direction.proshares.com
  • Magnification runs both ways: a down day in the Nasdaq-100 lands on shareholders at roughly double size, same as an up day.
  • Cheap for geared exposure, still well above a plain unleveraged Nasdaq-100 tracker. The waiver is set to lapse September 30, 2027, after which the 0.96% gross rate applies unless renewed.
  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.

Full QLD profile⁠

Full ROM profile⁠

QLD vs ROM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QLD vs ROM Cost

Overpaying ROM vs QLD

$667

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QLD 0.89%

    $16,872

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QLD 0.89%
  • ROM 0.93%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ROM $17,539QLD $16,872

Year by year

YearQLDROMOverpaying
10$1,576$1,644$68
20$5,953$6,199$246
30$16,872$17,539$667

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%QLD, cheaper
  • 0.93%ROM
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

QLD vs ROM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QLD 0.15%, better
ROM 0.03%
Payout (12M)
QLD $0.12
ROM $0.04
Last payment
QLD $0.03
ROM $0.02
Ex-dividend
QLD Sep 23, 2026
ROM Mar 25, 2026
Paid on
QLD Sep 29, 2026
ROM Mar 31, 2026
Frequency
QLD Quarterly
ROM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

QLDQuarterly · 21 paymentsAll QLD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0012; Jun 21, 2017 $0.00044; Dec 26, 2018 $0.005; Mar 20, 2019 $0.0078; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0052; Dec 24, 2019 $0.0062; Mar 25, 2020 $0.0011; Dec 22, 2022 $0.05; Sep 20, 2023 $0.09; Dec 20, 2023 $0.04; Mar 20, 2024 $0.03; Jun 26, 2024 $0.05; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.01; Jun 25, 2025 $0.06; Sep 24, 2025 $0.02; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.01; Jun 24, 2026 $0.06; Sep 23, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

QLD vs ROM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QLD
  • ROM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: ROM −67.6% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QLD 36.7%, betterROM 49.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QLD 1.04, betterROM 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QLD −63.7%, betterROM −67.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QLD 2.46ROM 3.09

QLD and ROM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QLDAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLDAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLDAvsUSDB

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Semiconductors

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.94%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ROMAvsUSDB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Semiconductors

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.94%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.