QLD ranks 1st and ROM 3rd of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs ROM
QLD −0.04pt a year
0.89%0.93%
QLD 87.0×the volume
4.15M47.7K
ROM +4.7pt
+31.9%+36.6%
QLD vs ROM Performance
+97.9%+126.1%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- ROM 0.93%
- QLD $13.3B
- ROM $1.15B
- QLD +10.7%
- ROM +26.5%, better
- QLD 0.15%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- QLD 113
- ROM 85
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- ROM 47.7K sh
- QLD $82.56
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | A88 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81 | A81 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
ROMA
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs ROM Cost
Overpaying ROM vs QLD
$667
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,644 | $68 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,199 | $246 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,539 | $667 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.93%ROM
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs ROM Dividends
- QLD 0.15%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- QLD $0.12
- ROM $0.04
- QLD $0.03
- ROM $0.02
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- ROM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%, betterROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%, betterROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46ROM 3.09
QLD and ROM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
