ROM ranks 3rd and DDM 4th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
DDM vs ROM
ROM −0.02pt a year
0.95%0.93%
DDM 3.9×the volume
185K47.7K
ROM +17.4pt
+19.2%+36.6%
DDM vs ROM Performance
+68.8%+126.1%
- DDM 0.95%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- DDM $507M
- ROM $1.15B
- DDM +13.4%
- ROM +26.5%, better
- DDM 0.98%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- DDM 34
- ROM 85
- DDM 185K sh, better
- ROM 47.7K sh
- DDM $62.99
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDM | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | A88 |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | A79 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DDM and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDMB
ROMA
In short
DDM The Dow dates to 1896. DDM is the only ETF built to double its daily move: 2x the Dow Jones Industrial Average, reset every single day, for 0.95% a year, running since 2006.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
DDM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDM vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDM vs ROM Cost
Overpaying DDM vs ROM
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDM 0.95%
$17,869
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDM | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,644 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,199 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,539 | $330 |
- 0.95%DDM
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
DDM 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
DDM vs ROM Dividends
- DDM 0.98%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- DDM $0.62
- ROM $0.04
- DDM $0.15
- ROM $0.02
- DDM Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- DDM Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- DDM Quarterly
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
DDM vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DDM
- ROM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DDM 24.6%, betterROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- DDM 0.96ROM 0.97, better
- Worst fall
- DDM −40.2%, betterROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- DDM 1.74ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.