ICLN ranks 1st and CNRG 3rd of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
CNRG vs ICLN
ICLN −0.07pt a year
0.45%0.38%
ICLN 690.2×the volume
9.06K6.25M
CNRG +2.6pt
−5.7%−8.3%
CNRG vs ICLN Performance
−25.4%−35.2%
- CNRG 0.45%
- ICLN 0.38%, better
- CNRG $163M
- ICLN $1.94B
- CNRG −23.2%
- ICLN −10.6%, better
- CNRG 1.66%, better
- ICLN 1.20%
- CNRG 40
- ICLN 124
- CNRG 9.06K sh
- ICLN 6.25M sh, better
- CNRG $78.65
- ICLN $15.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNRG | ICLN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | B57 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | A79Higher | B59 |
| Durability | B67 | A92Higher |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. CNRG and ICLN are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNRGB
ICLNA
In short
CNRG A focused read on clean power: about 40 global stocks tracked to an S&P Kensho index, at a fee below the clean-energy midpoint. Small fund, sharp mandate, one of the stronger builds in the theme.
ICLN The big, global way to own the energy transition: since 2008, ICLN has tracked roughly 100 clean-power companies across developed and emerging markets, charging 0.38% a year, below the typical clean-energy fee.
Stated mandate
CNRG The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index before fees and expenses.
ICLN The fund seeks to track an index representing global equities in the clean energy sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNRG vs ICLN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNRG vs ICLN Cost
Overpaying CNRG vs ICLN
$1,335
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNRG 0.45%
$9,041
ICLN 0.38%
$7,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNRG | ICLN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $688 | $124 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $2,658 | $470 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $7,706 | $1,335 |
- 0.45%CNRG
- 0.38%ICLN, cheaper
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
ICLN cheapest of 16 funds
CNRG 3rd cheapest of 16 funds
CNRG vs ICLN Dividends
- CNRG 1.66%, better
- ICLN 1.20%
- CNRG $1.27
- ICLN $0.18
- CNRG $0.36
- ICLN $0.06
- CNRG Sep 21, 2026
- ICLN Jun 15, 2026
- CNRG Sep 23, 2026
- ICLN Jun 18, 2026
- CNRG Quarterly
- ICLN Twice a year
Distribution history
CNRG vs ICLN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CNRG
- ICLN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNRG 34.4%ICLN 27.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CNRG 0.31, betterICLN 0.22
- Worst fall
- CNRG −59.2%ICLN −57.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CNRG 1.87ICLN 1.49
CNRG and ICLN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


