FRNW ranks 2nd and CNRG 3rd of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
CNRG vs FRNW
FRNW −0.06pt a year
0.45%0.39%
FRNW 8.0×the volume
9.06K72.2K
CNRG +0.6pt
−5.7%−6.3%
CNRG vs FRNW Performance
−25.4%−27.8%
- CNRG 0.45%
- FRNW 0.39%, better
- CNRG $163M
- FRNW $91M
- CNRG −23.2%
- FRNW −5.9%, better
- CNRG 1.66%, better
- FRNW 1.23%
- CNRG 40
- FRNW 66
- CNRG 9.06K sh
- FRNW 72.2K sh, better
- CNRG $78.65
- FRNW $19.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNRG | FRNW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | B57 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A79 | A83Higher |
| Durability | B67Higher | C48 |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. CNRG and FRNW are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNRGB
FRNWA
In short
CNRG A focused read on clean power: about 40 global stocks tracked to an S&P Kensho index, at a fee below the clean-energy midpoint. Small fund, sharp mandate, one of the stronger builds in the theme.
FRNW Fidelity wrote its own clean energy index, then priced the fund at 0.39% a year, matching the category's cheapest heavyweights and undercutting most rivals. Roughly 60 global stocks: solar, wind, and the grid gear behind them.
Stated mandate
CNRG The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index before fees and expenses.
FRNW The fund seeks returns that generally track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNRG vs FRNW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNRG vs FRNW Cost
Overpaying CNRG vs FRNW
$1,143
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNRG 0.45%
$9,041
FRNW 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNRG | FRNW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $705 | $107 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $2,725 | $403 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $7,898 | $1,143 |
- 0.45%CNRG
- 0.39%FRNW, cheaper
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
FRNW 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
CNRG 3rd cheapest of 16 funds
CNRG vs FRNW Dividends
- CNRG 1.66%, better
- FRNW 1.23%
- CNRG $1.27
- FRNW $0.24
- CNRG $0.36
- FRNW $0.05
- CNRG Sep 21, 2026
- FRNW Sep 18, 2026
- CNRG Sep 23, 2026
- FRNW Sep 22, 2026
- CNRG Quarterly
- FRNW Quarterly
Distribution history
CNRG vs FRNW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CNRG
- FRNW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNRG 34.4%FRNW 27.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CNRG 0.31FRNW 0.44, better
- Worst fall
- CNRG −59.2%, betterFRNW −59.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CNRG 1.87FRNW 1.53
CNRG and FRNW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
