Skip to content

CPRA vs FTKI

Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – April

CPRACNYSE Arca

First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF

FTKIBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CPRA −0.17pt a year

CPRA0.69%FTKI0.86%

Avg volume · 30D

FTKI 5.1×the volume

CPRA1.31KFTKI6.66K

CPRA vs FTKI Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.6%CPRA+19.9%FTKI

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CPRA +6.6%. FTKI +19.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CPRA 0.69%, better
FTKI 0.86%
Fund size
CPRA $13M
FTKI $25M
1Y total return
CPRA +6.6%
FTKI +19.9%, better
Yield (12M)
CPRA No data
FTKI 11.81%
Holdings
CPRA 3
FTKI 199
Avg volume (30D)
CPRA 1.31K sh
FTKI 6.66K sh, better
NAV per share
CPRA $28.01
FTKI $19.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CPRA: Cost 52, Risk 91, Mission not scored, Tradability 7, Holdings not scored, Durability 16. FTKI: Cost 40, Risk 82, Mission 100, Tradability 45, Holdings 75, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for CPRA, FTKI, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCPRAFTKI
Cost30% weightC52HigherC40
Mission25% weightNot scoredA100
Risk15% weightA91HigherA82
Tradability15% weightF7C45Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA75
Durability5% weightF16C45Higher

Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CPRA and FTKI are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 9 ›

FTKI ranks 4th and CPRA 6th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1ARYLDGlobal X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AIWMWiShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 2ARYLGGlobal X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETFScore 71
  4. Rank 4BFTKIFirst Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BIWMINEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 6CCPRACalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – AprilScore 47
  7. Rank 7CRDTERoundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CPRACCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – April

FTKIBFirst Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF

In short

CPRA Small caps without the trapdoor. CPRA uses options on IWM to aim for zero downside across a one-year April-to-April period, and pays for it with a hard ceiling on gains that Calamos resets each spring.

FTKI Most Russell 2000 income funds own the index and sell calls on it. FTKI runs an actively picked basket of roughly 300 US small caps, then writes index-level calls over the top: income first, appreciation second, paid monthly.

Stated mandate

CPRA The fund seeks to participate in the positive price return of the Russell 2000 up to a defined cap while protecting against all losses during a one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.

FTKI The Fund seeks current income first and capital appreciation second. It primarily invests in small-cap equities listed on U.S. exchanges and writes exchange-traded calls on the Russell 2000 Index or small-cap equity ETFs.

Why people hold it

  • CPRA The bargain is spelled out in the prospectus: shield against all losses over the full outcome period (before fees), upside stopped at a cap reset every April 1.calamos.com
  • Costs 0.69% a year, under the median for Russell 2000 options funds it competes with.
  • A different bet than the covered-call crowd. RYLD and IWMW sell calls for income and still ride small caps down. CPRA skips the income and puts the chips on protection.
  • The reference is IWM's price return, the small-cap benchmark most investors already know, not a bespoke back-tested index.
  • FTKI Two moving parts, one wrapper: an actively chosen small-cap stock portfolio underneath, calls on the Russell 2000 or small-cap ETFs written over the top.ftportfolios.com
  • The mandate puts current income first and capital appreciation second, and the cash goes out monthly.ftportfolios.com
  • Roughly 300 US-listed small caps sit under the options overlay, spreading the equity risk across the bench instead of a short list of names.

Worth knowing

  • CPRA The protection math is stated before fees and expenses and runs start to finish of the outcome period. Step in or out mid-period and your cap and cushion differ from the headline terms.
  • No income stream. Russell 2000 dividends sit outside the options structure, and the fund has not been making distributions.
  • Young, small and thinly traded since its 2025 launch, so wider spreads are more likely than with the category's giants.
  • FTKI At 0.86%, it prices above index-run Russell 2000 call writers such as RYLD and RYLG. Active stock selection is what you are paying the difference for.
  • Writing calls swaps upside for premium. When small caps run hard, the overlay limits how much of that run the fund keeps.ftportfolios.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still a small, lightly traded fund, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the category's heavyweights.

Full CPRA profile⁠

Full FTKI profile⁠

CPRA vs FTKI Holdings

How CPRA and FTKI differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CPRA and 0.0% of FTKI.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for CPRA.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for CPRA.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CPRA110.5%
  • FTKI23.3%

Securities held

  • CPRA0
  • FTKI198

Asset class

CPRA
Equity
FTKI
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CPRA0
  • In both0
  • Only in FTKI198

Only in CPRA

0 securities, 0.0% of CPRA by weight

Only in FTKI

198 securities, 96.0% of FTKI by weight

  • Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (Class A)2.28%
  • Etsy, Inc.2.26%
  • UiPath, Inc. (Class A)2.13%

Weight gaps

CPRA and FTKI share no securities.

All 5 CPRA holdings⁠All 203 FTKI holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CPRA vs FTKI Cost

Overpaying FTKI vs CPRA

$2,939

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CPRA 0.69%

    $13,429

  • FTKI 0.86%

    $16,368

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CPRA 0.69%
  • FTKI 0.86%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FTKI $16,368CPRA $13,429

Year by year

YearCPRAFTKIOverpaying
10$1,232$1,525$293
20$4,697$5,768$1,071
30$13,429$16,368$2,939

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%CPRA, cheaper
  • 0.86%FTKI
  • Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
  • Median 0.69%

CPRA 5th cheapest of 9 funds

FTKI 6th cheapest of 9 funds

CPRA vs FTKI Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CPRA No data
FTKI 11.81%
Payout (12M)
CPRA None
FTKI $2.31
Last payment
CPRA No data
FTKI $0.19
Ex-dividend
CPRA No data
FTKI Oct 21, 2026
Paid on
CPRA No data
FTKI Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
CPRA No data
FTKI Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

CPRAAll CPRA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FTKIMonthly · 19 paymentsAll FTKI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Apr 22, 2025 $0.19; May 21, 2025 $0.19; Jun 26, 2025 $0.19; Jul 22, 2025 $0.19; Aug 21, 2025 $0.19; Sep 25, 2025 $0.19; Oct 21, 2025 $0.19; Nov 21, 2025 $0.19; Dec 12, 2025 $0.19; Jan 21, 2026 $0.19; Feb 20, 2026 $0.19; Mar 26, 2026 $0.19; Apr 21, 2026 $0.19; May 21, 2026 $0.19; Jun 25, 2026 $0.19; Jul 21, 2026 $0.20; Aug 21, 2026 $0.20; Sep 24, 2026 $0.20; Oct 21, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

CPRA vs FTKI Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CPRA 1.6%since May 2025FTKI 10.8%since Mar 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CPRA 2.51since May 2025FTKI 0.61since Mar 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CPRA −1.7%since Apr 2025FTKI −15.2%since Feb 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CPRA 0.09FTKI 0.27

Popular comparisons

  • CPRACvsRYLDA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – April · Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTKIBvsRYLDA

    First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF · Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPRACvsIWMWA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – April · iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTKIBvsIWMWA

    First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF · iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPRACvsRYLGA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – April · Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTKIBvsRYLGA

    First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF · Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.