IWMW ranks 2nd and CPRA 6th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
CPRA vs IWMW
IWMW −0.30pt a year
0.69%0.39%
IWMW 11.3×the volume
1.31K14.8K
CPRA vs IWMW Performance
+6.6%+9.7%
- CPRA 0.69%
- IWMW 0.39%, better
- CPRA $13M
- IWMW $55M
- CPRA +6.6%
- IWMW +9.7%, better
- CPRA
- IWMW 20.14%
- CPRA 3
- IWMW 1970
- CPRA 1.31K sh
- IWMW 14.8K sh, better
- CPRA $28.01
- IWMW $37.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CPRA | IWMW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C52 | A83Higher |
| Mission | A86 | |
| Risk | A91Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | F7 | C51Higher |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | F16 | B64Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. CPRA and IWMW are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CPRAC
IWMWA
In short
CPRA Small caps without the trapdoor. CPRA uses options on IWM to aim for zero downside across a one-year April-to-April period, and pays for it with a hard ceiling on gains that Calamos resets each spring.
IWMW Small-cap income, stripped down: IWMW owns a Russell 2000 index fund and writes monthly covered calls against it, at 0.39% a year when most Russell 2000 call-writers charge more.
Stated mandate
CPRA The fund seeks to participate in the positive price return of the Russell 2000 up to a defined cap while protecting against all losses during a one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.
IWMW The fund seeks to track an index holding the iShares Russell 2000 ETF and writes monthly covered calls to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CPRA vs IWMW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CPRA vs IWMW Cost
Overpaying CPRA vs IWMW
$5,531
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CPRA 0.69%
$13,429
IWMW 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CPRA | IWMW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $705 | $527 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $2,725 | $1,972 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $7,898 | $5,531 |
- 0.69%CPRA
- 0.39%IWMW, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
IWMW 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
CPRA 5th cheapest of 9 funds
CPRA vs IWMW Dividends
- CPRA
- IWMW 20.14%
- CPRA None
- IWMW $7.52
- CPRA
- IWMW $0.59
- CPRA
- IWMW Oct 2, 2026
- CPRA
- IWMW Oct 7, 2026
- CPRA
- IWMW Monthly
Distribution history
CPRA vs IWMW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CPRA 1.6%IWMW 12.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- CPRA 2.51IWMW 0.37
- Worst fall
- CPRA −1.7%IWMW −21.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CPRA 0.09IWMW 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.