ROM ranks 3rd and CPXR 79th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
CPXR vs ROM
ROM −0.29pt a year
1.22%0.93%
ROM 3.9×the volume
12.9K50.3K
CPXR vs ROM Performance
+40.6%+23.8%
- CPXR 1.22%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- CPXR $11M
- ROM $962M
- CPXR +40.6%, better
- ROM +23.8%
- CPXR
- ROM 0.03%
- CPXR 8
- ROM 86
- CPXR 12.9K sh
- ROM 50.3K sh, better
- CPXR $28.02
- ROM $110.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CPXR | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B59Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | C49 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | C48 | A80Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. CPXR and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CPXRD
ROMA
In short
CPXR Most leveraged ETFs double down on stock indexes. CPXR points the same machinery at copper, aiming for twice the daily move of a copper futures index, at 1.22% with no fee waiver in place.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
CPXR The fund is presented as a daily leveraged vehicle seeking twice the daily movement of a copper index.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CPXR vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CPXR vs ROM Cost
Overpaying CPXR vs ROM
$4,619
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CPXR 1.22%
$22,158
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CPXR | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,131 | $1,644 | $487 |
| 20 | $7,931 | $6,199 | $1,732 |
| 30 | $22,158 | $17,539 | $4,619 |
- 1.22%CPXR
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
CPXR 87th cheapest of 95 funds
CPXR vs ROM Dividends
- CPXR
- ROM 0.03%
- CPXR
- ROM $0.04
- CPXR $0.19
- ROM $0.02
- CPXR Dec 23, 2025
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- CPXR Dec 24, 2025
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- CPXR Irregular
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
CPXR vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CPXR 44.5%ROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- CPXR 0.73ROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- CPXR −47.9%ROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CPXR 0.69ROM 3.09
CPXR and ROM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.22% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.22% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.22% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
