WQTM ranks 2nd and LAZR 4th of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.
LAZR vs WQTM
WQTM −0.30pt a year
0.75%0.45%
WQTM 1.1×the volume
186K214K
LAZR vs WQTM Performance
−9.0%−16.2%
- LAZR 0.75%
- WQTM 0.45%, better
- LAZR $203M
- WQTM $291M
- LAZR
- WQTM −13.1%
- LAZR 25
- WQTM 57
- LAZR 186K sh
- WQTM 214K sh, better
- LAZR $34.27
- WQTM $26.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LAZR | WQTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A72Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C53 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | A89Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A90Higher |
Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
Same Category. LAZR and WQTM are both graded against the same 8 Quantum Computing & Photonics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LAZRC
WQTMA
In short
WQTM Plenty of quantum ETFs treat a chip giant and a qubit startup as near-equals. WQTM, built with quantum software firm Classiq, scores how central quantum actually is to each company and pushes weight toward the pure plays.
Stated mandate
WQTM The Fund passively tracks the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LAZR vs WQTM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LAZR vs WQTM Cost
Overpaying LAZR vs WQTM
$5,441
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LAZR 0.75%
$14,482
WQTM 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LAZR | WQTM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $812 | $524 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,128 | $1,950 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,041 | $5,441 |
- 0.75%LAZR
- 0.45%WQTM, cheaper
- Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
- Median 0.54%
WQTM 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
LAZR 7th cheapest of 8 funds
LAZR vs WQTM Dividends
- LAZR None
- WQTM None
Distribution history
LAZR vs WQTM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LAZR WQTM 50.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LAZR WQTM −0.13
- Worst fall
- LAZR WQTM −36.3%
- Market sensitivity
- LAZR 7.78WQTM 2.92
LAZR and WQTM in the news

First-Year Review
WisdomTree's quantum fund turns one up 7.49%


Top Movers
Tanker ETF gains 8.4% as crude falls



Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.