CSCS ranks 27th and SKHZ 27th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
CSCS vs SKHZ
SKHZ −0.25pt a year
1.00%0.75%
SKHZ 147.1×the volume
12.9K1.9M
CSCS vs SKHZ Performance
+20.0%−11.2%
- CSCS 1.00%
- SKHZ 0.75%, better
- CSCS $2M
- SKHZ $7M
- CSCS −34.4%
- SKHZ
- CSCS 3.28%
- SKHZ
- CSCS 4
- SKHZ 2
- CSCS 12.9K sh
- SKHZ 1.9M sh, better
- CSCS $15.92
- SKHZ $12.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSCS | SKHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B57 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C43Higher | D27 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. CSCS and SKHZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSCSC
SKHZC
In short
CSCS A straight bet against Cisco, the networking giant: CSCS aims for -100% of CSCO's daily move, no leverage stacked on top, in a category crowded with 2x and 3x shorts.
Stated mandate
CSCS The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Cisco Systems, Inc. common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSCS vs SKHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSCS vs SKHZ Cost
Overpaying CSCS vs SKHZ
$4,206
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSCS 1.00%
$18,688
SKHZ 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSCS | SKHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,336 | $427 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $5,078 | $1,547 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $14,482 | $4,206 |
- 1.00%CSCS
- 0.75%SKHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
SKHZ cheapest of 43 funds
CSCS 8th cheapest of 43 funds
CSCS vs SKHZ Dividends
- CSCS 3.28%
- SKHZ
- CSCS $0.50
- SKHZ None
- CSCS $0.11
- SKHZ
- CSCS Sep 22, 2026
- SKHZ
- CSCS Sep 29, 2026
- SKHZ
- CSCS Quarterly
- SKHZ
Distribution history
CSCS vs SKHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSCS 27.1%SKHZ
- Return per unit of risk
- CSCS −1.34SKHZ
- Worst fall
- CSCS −51.6%SKHZ
- Market sensitivity
- CSCS −1.45SKHZ −6.28
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.