TSLS ranks 3rd and CSCS 27th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
CSCS vs TSLS
TSLS −0.05pt a year
1.00%0.95%
TSLS 23.6×the volume
12.9K304K
CSCS vs TSLS Performance
−34.4%−0.7%
- CSCS 1.00%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- CSCS $2M
- TSLS $44M
- CSCS −34.4%
- TSLS −0.7%, better
- CSCS 3.28%, better
- TSLS 2.99%
- CSCS 4
- TSLS 4
- CSCS 12.9K sh
- TSLS 304K sh, better
- CSCS $15.92
- TSLS $55.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSCS | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A87 |
| Risk | B57 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C43 | A81Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. CSCS and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSCSC
TSLSA
In short
CSCS A straight bet against Cisco, the networking giant: CSCS aims for -100% of CSCO's daily move, no leverage stacked on top, in a category crowded with 2x and 3x shorts.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
CSCS The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Cisco Systems, Inc. common shares.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSCS vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSCS vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying CSCS vs TSLS
$819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSCS 1.00%
$18,688
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSCS | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,678 | $85 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,322 | $303 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $17,869 | $819 |
- 1.00%CSCS
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
CSCS 8th cheapest of 43 funds
CSCS vs TSLS Dividends
- CSCS 3.28%, better
- TSLS 2.99%
- CSCS $0.50
- TSLS $1.57
- CSCS $0.11
- TSLS $0.40
- CSCS Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- CSCS Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- CSCS Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
CSCS vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSCS 27.1%TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSCS −1.34TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- CSCS −51.6%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CSCS −1.45TSLS −1.37
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.