Skip to content
etf.net

CTJL vs DAUG

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

CTJLCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August

DAUGCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTJL −0.55pt a year

CTJL0.30%DAUG0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

DAUG 28.6×the volume

CTJL920DAUG26.3K

CTJL vs DAUG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+0.7%CTJL−0.1%DAUG

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. CTJL +0.7%. DAUG −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.1%1.5%2%2.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CTJL 0.30%, better
DAUG 0.85%
Fund size
CTJL $1M
DAUG $446M
1Y total return
CTJL No data
DAUG +7.6%
Holdings
CTJL 4
DAUG 3
Avg volume (30D)
CTJL 920 sh
DAUG 26.3K sh, better
NAV per share
CTJL $25.44
DAUG $47.42
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTJL: Cost 97, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. DAUG: Cost 31, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 74, Holdings 48, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTJL, DAUG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTJLDAUG
Cost30% weightA97HigherD31
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51HigherC45
Tradability15% weightF12A74Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC48
Durability5% weightF2A79Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTJL and DAUG are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

DAUG ranks 10th and CTJL 17th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 9CDJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - JulyScore 49
  2. Rank 10CDAUGFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - AugustScore 47
  3. Rank 10CDMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  4. Rank 16CDMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MayScore 41
  5. Rank 17CCTJLCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 17CCTJNCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTJLCCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

DAUGCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August

In short

CTJL No data

DAUG Insurance with a deductible. DAUG bears the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, then absorbs the next 25 points of losses, and in exchange your upside is capped at a level reset every August. Running since 2019.

Stated mandate

CTJL No data

DAUG The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an 11.98% upside cap and protection for losses in the -5% to -30% range during the current outcome period.

Why people hold it

CTJL No data

  • DAUG The cushion sits where drawdowns bite: SPY losses between -5% and -30% are absorbed, a 25-point buffer, before losses pass through one-for-one again.sec.gov
  • Twelve siblings run the same deep-buffer recipe on a monthly cycle (DJAN through DDEC), so you can pick a reset month or spread money across several start dates.
  • Terms are knowable up front: the new cap is set at each August reset, disclosed in a filing and posted to the fund's site before the period begins.sec.gov
  • Live since 2019, so this August reset has been rolled through real market stress rather than a backtest.

Worth knowing

CTJL No data

  • DAUG The reference is SPY's price return, so S&P 500 dividends are not part of what you capture. That is part of what the buffer costs.sec.gov
  • Buffer and cap are designed for the full outcome period. Buy midstream and your own remaining cushion and upside differ from the headline terms.sec.gov
  • 0.85% matches the deep-buffer cohort median, while Pacer's SOS conservative funds (PSCX, PSCW) charge 0.49%. Volume is light here, so spreads can run wider.

Full CTJL profile⁠

Full DAUG profile⁠

CTJL vs DAUG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTJL vs DAUG Cost

Overpaying DAUG vs CTJL

$10,050

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTJL 0.30%

    $6,149

  • DAUG 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTJL 0.30%
  • DAUG 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DAUG $16,199CTJL $6,149

Year by year

YearCTJLDAUGOverpaying
10$545$1,508$963
20$2,113$5,706$3,593
30$6,149$16,199$10,050

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTJL, cheaper
  • 0.85%DAUG
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

CTJL cheapest of 19 funds

DAUG 8th cheapest of 19 funds

CTJL vs DAUG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTJL None
DAUG None

Distribution history

CTJLAll CTJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DAUGAll DAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTJL vs DAUG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTJL No dataDAUG 6.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTJL No dataDAUG 1.33
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTJL No dataDAUG −15.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTJL 0.00DAUG 0.53

Popular comparisons

  • CTJLCvsPSCXB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DAUGCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTJLCvsUFEBB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DAUGCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTJLCvsPSCQB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DAUGCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.