UJUL ranks 6th and CTMA 13th of 13 funds in the S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% Category.
CTMA vs UJUL
0.0%by weight
CTMA −0.49pt a year
0.30%0.79%
UJUL 23.4×the volume
1.86K43.4K
CTMA vs UJUL Performance
+0.8%+1.2%
- CTMA 0.30%, better
- UJUL 0.79%
- CTMA $2M
- UJUL $303M
- CTMA
- UJUL +7.4%
- CTMA
- UJUL 0.00%
- CTMA 4
- UJUL 4
- CTMA 1.86K sh
- UJUL 43.4K sh, better
- CTMA $25.79
- UJUL $41.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTMA | UJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51Higher | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | F2 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | F2 | A80Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
Same Category. CTMA and UJUL are both graded against the same 13 S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CTMA vs UJUL Holdings
How CTMA and UJUL differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CTMA and 0.0% of UJUL.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector98.5%
Sector
| Sector | More in CTMAMore in UJUL | CTMA | UJUL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | CTMA +0.6 points | 39.3% | 38.7% |
| Communication | UJUL +0.6 points | 8.9% | 9.5% |
| Health Care | CTMA +0.5 points | 9.8% | 9.3% |
| Financials | UJUL +0.3 points | 11.7% | 12.0% |
| Industrials | UJUL +0.3 points | 7.5% | 7.8% |
| Energy | CTMA +0.2 points | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Consumer Staples | CTMA +0.2 points | 4.7% | 4.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | UJUL +0.2 points | 9.1% | 9.3% |
| Materials | UJUL +0.2 points | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Real Estate | UJUL +0.1 points | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CTMAMore in UJUL | CTMA | UJUL |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CTMA102.4%
- UJUL101.9%
- CTMA3
- UJUL4
Asset class
- CTMA
- Equity
- UJUL
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CTMA3
- In both0
- Only in UJUL4
Only in CTMA
3 securities, 96.0% of CTMA by weight
- Spy 04/30/2027 144.74 C80.34%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.75% 04/30/202713.74%
- Spy 04/30/2027 687.52 P1.89%
Only in UJUL
4 securities, 100% of UJUL by weight
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF98.17%
- Voo 06/30/2027 652.47 P3.11%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.56%
- Voo 06/30/2027 714.24 C0.11%
Weight gaps
CTMA and UJUL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTMA vs UJUL Cost
Overpaying UJUL vs CTMA
$9,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTMA 0.30%
$6,149
UJUL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTMA | UJUL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,405 | $860 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,331 | $3,218 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $15,174 | $9,025 |
- 0.30%CTMA, cheaper
- 0.79%UJUL
- Middle half of S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
- Median 0.79%
CTMA cheapest of 13 funds
UJUL 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
CTMA vs UJUL Dividends
- CTMA
- UJUL 0.00%
- CTMA None
- UJUL None
Distribution history
CTMA vs UJUL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTMA UJUL 6.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTMA UJUL 1.32
- Worst fall
- CTMA UJUL −11.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CTMA 0.41UJUL 0.52
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.