UMAY ranks 6th and CTMA 13th of 13 funds in the S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% Category.
CTMA vs UMAY
0.0%by weight
CTMA −0.49pt a year
0.30%0.79%
UMAY 13.1×the volume
1.86K24.4K
CTMA vs UMAY Performance
+0.8%+1.9%
- CTMA 0.30%, better
- UMAY 0.79%
- CTMA $2M
- UMAY $83M
- CTMA
- UMAY +7.4%
- CTMA 4
- UMAY 5
- CTMA 1.86K sh
- UMAY 24.4K sh, better
- CTMA $25.79
- UMAY $38.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTMA | UMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51Higher | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | F2 | B55Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | F2 | D29Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
Same Category. CTMA and UMAY are both graded against the same 13 S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CTMA vs UMAY Holdings
How CTMA and UMAY differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 6.4% of CTMA and 0.0% of UMAY.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector98.5%
Sector
| Sector | More in CTMAMore in UMAY | CTMA | UMAY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | CTMA +0.6 points | 39.3% | 38.7% |
| Communication | UMAY +0.6 points | 8.9% | 9.5% |
| Health Care | CTMA +0.5 points | 9.8% | 9.3% |
| Financials | UMAY +0.3 points | 11.7% | 12.0% |
| Industrials | UMAY +0.3 points | 7.5% | 7.8% |
| Energy | CTMA +0.2 points | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Consumer Staples | CTMA +0.2 points | 4.7% | 4.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | UMAY +0.2 points | 9.1% | 9.3% |
| Materials | UMAY +0.2 points | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Real Estate | UMAY +0.1 points | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CTMAMore in UMAY | CTMA | UMAY |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CTMA102.4%
- UMAY102.5%
- CTMA3
- UMAY4
Asset class
- CTMA
- Equity
- UMAY
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CTMA3
- In both0
- Only in UMAY4
Only in CTMA
3 securities, 96.0% of CTMA by weight
- Spy 04/30/2027 144.74 C80.34%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.75% 04/30/202713.74%
- Spy 04/30/2027 687.52 P1.89%
Only in UMAY
4 securities, 100% of UMAY by weight
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF99.63%
- Voo 04/30/2027 627.55 P1.95%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.79%
- Voo 04/30/2027 686.99 C0.13%
Weight gaps
CTMA and UMAY share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTMA vs UMAY Cost
Overpaying UMAY vs CTMA
$9,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTMA 0.30%
$6,149
UMAY 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTMA | UMAY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,405 | $860 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,331 | $3,218 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $15,174 | $9,025 |
- 0.30%CTMA, cheaper
- 0.79%UMAY
- Middle half of S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
- Median 0.79%
CTMA cheapest of 13 funds
UMAY 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
CTMA vs UMAY Dividends
- CTMA None
- UMAY None
Distribution history
CTMA vs UMAY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTMA UMAY 4.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTMA UMAY 1.77
- Worst fall
- CTMA UMAY −12.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CTMA 0.41UMAY 0.30
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.