SLV ranks 2nd of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
CTWO vs SLV
SLV −0.29pt a year
0.79%0.50%
SLV 18386.8×the volume
88916.3M
CTWO vs SLV Performance
+8.3%+1.3%
- CTWO 0.79%
- SLV 0.50%, better
- CTWO $2M
- SLV $25.2B
- CTWO +8.3%, better
- SLV +1.3%
- CTWO 2
- SLV 1
- CTWO 889 sh
- SLV 16.3M sh, better
- CTWO $19.60
- SLV $45.22
ETF.net Grade
- —CTWOUnder classification review
| Pillar | CTWO | SLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67 | |
| Mission | A89 | |
| Risk | D37 | |
| Tradability | A71 | |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A84 |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Our read on each fund
CTWO—
SLVB
In short
SLV Silver, unbundled: real bars sitting with a custodian, a share price that shadows the LBMA Silver Price less a 0.50% fee. Trading since 2006 and one of the busiest commodity funds on the tape, it's the default way people put silver in a brokerage account.
Stated mandate
SLV The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of silver prices before its expenses and liabilities. Its assets consist primarily of silver held by a custodian.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CTWO vs SLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTWO vs SLV Cost
Overpaying CTWO vs SLV
$5,195
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTWO 0.79%
$15,174
SLV 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTWO | SLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $900 | $505 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,460 | $1,871 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,979 | $5,195 |
- 0.79%CTWO
- 0.50%SLV, cheaper
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
SLV 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
CTWO 9th cheapest of 9 funds
CTWO vs SLV Dividends
- CTWO None
- SLV None
Distribution history
CTWO vs SLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTWO 23.6%SLV 37.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTWO 0.54SLV 0.75
- Worst fall
- CTWO −30.1%SLV −57.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CTWO 1.28SLV 1.26
CTWO and SLV in the news
Price vs Value
iShares silver fund's 1.38% discount was a morning price

First-Year Review
Kurv's silver fund paid $7.70 in year one and still lagged the metal



Price vs Value
URNJ closed 1.57% below the value of its miners Friday


Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.