SLV ranks 2nd and PLTM 3rd of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
PLTM vs SLV
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.50%0.50%
SLV 118.5×the volume
138K16.3M
SLV +8.5pt
+6.6%+15.1%
PLTM vs SLV Performance
+37.8%+101.9%
- PLTM 0.50%
- SLV 0.50%
- PLTM $150M
- SLV $25.2B
- PLTM −9.2%
- SLV +1.3%, better
- PLTM 0.00%
- SLV
- PLTM 1
- SLV 1
- PLTM 138K sh
- SLV 16.3M sh, better
- PLTM $14.20
- SLV $45.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PLTM | SLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67 | B67 |
| Mission | A94Higher | A89 |
| Risk | C44Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | C42 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C43 | A84Higher |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. PLTM and SLV are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PLTMB
SLVB
In short
PLTM Platinum, in a vault, sliced into shares. PLTM holds allocated bullion and charges 0.50% a year, undercutting the older platinum trust on fee, which is most of what separates two funds holding the same metal.
SLV Silver, unbundled: real bars sitting with a custodian, a share price that shadows the LBMA Silver Price less a 0.50% fee. Trading since 2006 and one of the busiest commodity funds on the tape, it's the default way people put silver in a brokerage account.
Stated mandate
PLTM The Trust seeks to reflect the price of platinum, less its expenses, through allocated physical platinum bullion.
SLV The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of silver prices before its expenses and liabilities. Its assets consist primarily of silver held by a custodian.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PLTM vs SLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PLTM vs SLV Cost
Same expense ratio
$9,979
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PLTM 0.50%
$9,979
SLV 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PLTM | SLV |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $900 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,460 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,979 |
- 0.50%PLTM
- 0.50%SLV
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
PLTM 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
SLV 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
PLTM vs SLV Dividends
- PLTM 0.00%
- SLV
- PLTM None
- SLV None
Distribution history
PLTM vs SLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PLTM
- SLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PLTM 33.0%, betterSLV 37.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PLTM 0.44SLV 0.75, better
- Worst fall
- PLTM −48.4%, betterSLV −57.8%
- Market sensitivity
- PLTM 0.55SLV 1.26
PLTM and SLV in the news
Price vs Value
iShares silver fund's 1.38% discount was a morning price

First-Year Review
Kurv's silver fund paid $7.70 in year one and still lagged the metal



Price vs Value
URNJ closed 1.57% below the value of its miners Friday


Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.