SIVR ranks 1st and SLV 2nd of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
SIVR vs SLV
100%by weight
SIVR −0.20pt a year
0.30%0.50%
SLV 11.1×the volume
1.47M16.3M
SIVR +0.3pt
+10.4%+10.1%
SIVR vs SLV Performance
+103.7%+101.9%
- SIVR 0.30%, better
- SLV 0.50%
- SIVR $3.45B
- SLV $25.2B
- SIVR +1.5%, better
- SLV +1.3%
- SIVR 1
- SLV 1
- SIVR 1.47M sh
- SLV 16.3M sh, better
- SIVR $47.57
- SLV $45.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SIVR | SLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | B67 |
| Mission | A89 | A89 |
| Risk | D37 | D37 |
| Tradability | C52 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A73 | A84Higher |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. SIVR and SLV are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SIVRA
SLVB
In short
SIVR Silver bullion in a vault, wrapped in a ticker. SIVR has done that one job since 2009 at 0.30% a year, half the going rate for physical metal funds, and fee is most of the tracking gap here.
SLV Silver, unbundled: real bars sitting with a custodian, a share price that shadows the LBMA Silver Price less a 0.50% fee. Trading since 2006 and one of the busiest commodity funds on the tape, it's the default way people put silver in a brokerage account.
Stated mandate
SIVR The Trust seeks to track the price of physical silver, after deducting its expenses.
SLV The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of silver prices before its expenses and liabilities. Its assets consist primarily of silver held by a custodian.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SIVR vs SLV Holdings
How SIVR and SLV differ
100%
Shared holdings make up 100% of SIVR and 100% of SLV.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SIVR and SLV.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SIVR and SLV.
Concentration
- SIVR100.0%
- SLV100.0%
- SIVR1
- SLV1
Asset class
- SIVR
- Alternatives
- SLV
- Commodities
Holdings
- Only in SIVR0
- In both1
- Only in SLV0
Only in SIVR
0 securities, 0.0% of SIVR by weight
Only in SLV
0 securities, 0.0% of SLV by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in SIVRMore in SLV | SIVR | SLV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Silver | Same weight | 100.00% | 100.00% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SIVR vs SLV Cost
Overpaying SLV vs SIVR
$3,830
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SIVR 0.30%
$6,149
SLV 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SIVR | SLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $900 | $355 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,460 | $1,347 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $9,979 | $3,830 |
- 0.30%SIVR, cheaper
- 0.50%SLV
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
SIVR cheapest of 9 funds
SLV 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
SIVR vs SLV Dividends
- SIVR None
- SLV None
Distribution history
SIVR vs SLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SIVR
- SLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SIVR 37.0%SLV 37.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- SIVR 0.75SLV 0.75Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- SIVR −57.7%, betterSLV −57.8%
- Market sensitivity
- SIVR 1.26SLV 1.26Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
SIVR and SLV in the news
Price vs Value
iShares silver fund's 1.38% discount was a morning price

First-Year Review
Kurv's silver fund paid $7.70 in year one and still lagged the metal



Price vs Value
URNJ closed 1.57% below the value of its miners Friday


Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.