Skip to content

SIVR vs SLV

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

SIVRANYSE Arca

iShares Silver Trust

SLVBNYSE Arca

Overlap

100%by weight

Expense ratio

SIVR −0.20pt a year

SIVR0.30%SLV0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

SLV 11.1×the volume

SIVR1.47MSLV16.3M

10Y return · a year

SIVR +0.3pt

SIVR+10.4%SLV+10.1%

SIVR vs SLV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+103.7%SIVR+101.9%SLV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. SIVR +103.7%. SLV +101.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%200%300%400%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SIVR 0.30%, better
SLV 0.50%
Fund size
SIVR $3.45B
SLV $25.2B
1Y total return
SIVR +1.5%, better
SLV +1.3%
Holdings
SIVR 1
SLV 1
Avg volume (30D)
SIVR 1.47M sh
SLV 16.3M sh, better
NAV per share
SIVR $47.57
SLV $45.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SIVR: Cost 92, Risk 37, Mission 89, Tradability 52, Holdings not scored, Durability 73. SLV: Cost 67, Risk 37, Mission 89, Tradability 71, Holdings not scored, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for SIVR, SLV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSIVRSLV
Cost30% weightA92HigherB67
Mission25% weightA89A89
Risk15% weightD37D37
Tradability15% weightC52A71Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA73A84Higher

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SIVR and SLV are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

SIVR ranks 1st and SLV 2nd of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 3BPLTMGraniteShares Platinum TrustScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SIVRAabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

SLVBiShares Silver Trust

In short

SIVR Silver bullion in a vault, wrapped in a ticker. SIVR has done that one job since 2009 at 0.30% a year, half the going rate for physical metal funds, and fee is most of the tracking gap here.

SLV Silver, unbundled: real bars sitting with a custodian, a share price that shadows the LBMA Silver Price less a 0.50% fee. Trading since 2006 and one of the busiest commodity funds on the tape, it's the default way people put silver in a brokerage account.

Stated mandate

SIVR The Trust seeks to track the price of physical silver, after deducting its expenses.

SLV The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of silver prices before its expenses and liabilities. Its assets consist primarily of silver held by a custodian.

Why people hold it

  • SIVR 0.30% a year, versus a 0.60% median across physical metal funds and 0.50% at the biggest silver trust, SLV. When the mandate is just holding metal, cost is the differentiator.
  • The mandate is one sentence: track the price of physical silver after expenses. Real metal, not futures contracts, swaps, or miner stocks standing in for the metal.
  • A multi-billion-dollar trust that trades actively, so entering and exiting is usually a routine order rather than a hunt for the other side.
  • Running since 2009 and rated among the strongest implementations in the physical commodity group, on both cost and how closely it delivers its stated mandate.
  • SLV The deep end of the silver pool: running since 2006, a multi-billion-dollar trust, and very actively traded, which is what keeps spreads tight and the options market busy.
  • Metal, not machinery. Assets are physical silver held by a custodian and priced off the LBMA Silver Price. No futures roll, no miner earnings, no swap counterparty.sec.gov
  • 0.50% a year, under the typical physical-metal trust, and the design is about as plain as it gets: bullion price minus expenses, tracked closely.

Worth knowing

  • SIVR One metal, one price. Silver moves hard in both directions and there is no diversification inside the trust to soften it.
  • Bullion generates no cash flow, so this is a price-only holding rather than an income one.
  • It is a commodity trust, not a registered 1940 Act fund, so the legal protections and tax treatment differ from a standard stock or bond ETF.
  • SLV SIVR runs the same physical-silver idea for 0.30%. The extra fee here buys size and trading depth, not different metal.
  • No income. Bullion pays nothing, and the trustee sells silver to cover expenses, so the metal behind each share slowly shrinks.sec.gov
  • One metal, one price. Nothing inside the trust cushions a silver drawdown, and silver is a jumpy market by nature.

Full SIVR profile⁠

Full SLV profile⁠

SIVR vs SLV Holdings

How SIVR and SLV differ

Overlap by weight

100%

Shared holdings make up 100% of SIVR and 100% of SLV.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Commodities0.0%
  • Holdings1 in both100%

Sector

No Sector split for SIVR and SLV.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for SIVR and SLV.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • SIVR100.0%
  • SLV100.0%

Securities held

  • SIVR1
  • SLV1

Asset class

SIVR
Alternatives
SLV
Commodities

Holdings

  • Only in SIVR0
  • In both1
  • Only in SLV0

Only in SIVR

0 securities, 0.0% of SIVR by weight

Only in SLV

0 securities, 0.0% of SLV by weight

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in SIVR and SLV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in SIVRMore in SLV
Physical SilverSame weight

All SIVR holdings⁠All SLV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SIVR vs SLV Cost

Overpaying SLV vs SIVR

$3,830

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SIVR 0.30%

    $6,149

  • SLV 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SIVR 0.30%
  • SLV 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530SLV $9,979SIVR $6,149

Year by year

YearSIVRSLVOverpaying
10$545$900$355
20$2,113$3,460$1,347
30$6,149$9,979$3,830

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%SIVR, cheaper
  • 0.50%SLV
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

SIVR cheapest of 9 funds

SLV 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

SIVR vs SLV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
SIVR None
SLV None

Distribution history

SIVRAll SIVR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SLVAll SLV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIVR vs SLV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • SIVR
  • SLV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: SLV −57.8% · Oct 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SIVR 37.0%SLV 37.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SIVR 0.75SLV 0.75Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SIVR −57.7%, betterSLV −57.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SIVR 1.26SLV 1.26Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

SIVR and SLV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SIVRAvsPLTMB

    abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVBvsPLTMB

    iShares Silver Trust · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIVRAvsGLTRB

    abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVBvsGLTRB

    iShares Silver Trust · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIVRAvsPPLTB

    abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVBvsPPLTB

    iShares Silver Trust · abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.