SLV ranks 2nd and GLTR 4th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
GLTR vs SLV
SLV −0.10pt a year
0.60%0.50%
SLV 267.6×the volume
61.1K16.3M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+10.1%+10.1%
GLTR vs SLV Performance
+85.0%+101.9%
- GLTR 0.60%
- SLV 0.50%, better
- GLTR $2.32B
- SLV $25.2B
- GLTR −3.7%
- SLV +1.3%, better
- GLTR 1
- SLV 1
- GLTR 61.1K sh
- SLV 16.3M sh, better
- GLTR $167.14
- SLV $45.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLTR | SLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | B67Higher |
| Mission | A92Higher | A89 |
| Risk | B62Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | B57 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B69 | A84Higher |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. GLTR and SLV are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLTRB
SLVB
In short
GLTR Gold, silver, platinum and palladium in one wrapper, all held as physical bullion. GLTR is the rare one-ticker version of the entire precious-metals complex, running since 2010, and it owns the metal instead of renting exposure through futures.
SLV Silver, unbundled: real bars sitting with a custodian, a share price that shadows the LBMA Silver Price less a 0.50% fee. Trading since 2006 and one of the busiest commodity funds on the tape, it's the default way people put silver in a brokerage account.
Stated mandate
GLTR The Trust holds a physical bullion basket containing gold, silver, platinum, and palladium in specified proportions, with baskets issued against bullion deposits and bullion distributed on redemptions.
SLV The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of silver prices before its expenses and liabilities. Its assets consist primarily of silver held by a custodian.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLTR vs SLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLTR vs SLV Cost
Overpaying GLTR vs SLV
$1,838
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLTR 0.60%
$11,817
SLV 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLTR | SLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $900 | $176 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $3,460 | $656 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $9,979 | $1,838 |
- 0.60%GLTR
- 0.50%SLV, cheaper
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
SLV 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
GLTR 5th cheapest of 9 funds
GLTR vs SLV Dividends
- GLTR None
- SLV None
Distribution history
GLTR vs SLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GLTR
- SLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLTR 24.1%, betterSLV 37.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GLTR 0.82, betterSLV 0.75
- Worst fall
- GLTR −41.9%, betterSLV −57.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GLTR 0.68SLV 1.26
GLTR and SLV in the news

Price vs Value
iShares silver fund's 1.38% discount was a morning price

First-Year Review
Kurv's silver fund paid $7.70 in year one and still lagged the metal



Price vs Value
URNJ closed 1.57% below the value of its miners Friday

Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.