FTAG ranks 4th and CUT 5th of 5 funds in the Agriculture & Food Category.
CUT vs FTAG
FTAG −0.06pt a year
0.76%0.70%
FTAG 1.4×the volume
1.85K2.58K
FTAG +0.9pt
+3.9%+4.8%
CUT vs FTAG Performance
−12.2%+5.2%
- CUT 0.76%
- FTAG 0.70%, better
- CUT $30M
- FTAG $14M
- CUT +2.6%
- FTAG +14.2%, better
- CUT 2.55%, better
- FTAG 1.18%
- CUT 55
- FTAG 58
- CUT 1.85K sh
- FTAG 2.58K sh, better
- CUT $28.18
- FTAG $28.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CUT | FTAG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | D31Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D27 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | D39Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | D39 |
| Durability | B67Higher | C44 |
Rank among Agriculture & Food funds
Same Category. CUT and FTAG are both graded against the same 5 Agriculture & Food funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CUTD
FTAGC
In short
CUT The first timber ETF to list in the US, running since 2007. It owns the forest and the mill: timberland owners plus the companies that turn logs into lumber, paper and packaging, across developed and emerging markets.
FTAG Live since 2010, FTAG owns the companies trying to squeeze more out of every acre: roughly 60 global stocks tied to improving agricultural yields, held as equities rather than grain futures.
Stated mandate
CUT The Fund is passively managed and seeks to generally match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI ACWI IMI Timber Select Capped Index. Its mandate covers securities connected with forest ownership and management and the manufacture of timber-based products.
FTAG FTAG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Indxx Global Agriculture Index. The index targets companies directly or indirectly engaged in improving agricultural yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CUT vs FTAG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CUT vs FTAG Cost
Overpaying CUT vs FTAG
$1,050
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CUT 0.76%
$14,656
FTAG 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CUT | FTAG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $1,250 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $4,760 | $382 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $13,606 | $1,050 |
- 0.76%CUT
- 0.70%FTAG, cheaper
- Middle half of Agriculture & Food funds
- Median 0.56%
FTAG 4th cheapest of 5 funds
CUT 5th cheapest of 5 funds
CUT vs FTAG Dividends
- CUT 2.55%, better
- FTAG 1.18%
- CUT $0.72
- FTAG $0.34
- CUT $0.72
- FTAG $0.06
- CUT Dec 22, 2025
- FTAG Sep 24, 2026
- CUT Dec 26, 2025
- FTAG Sep 30, 2026
- CUT Annual
- FTAG Quarterly
Distribution history
CUT vs FTAG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CUT
- FTAG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CUT 16.1%FTAG 12.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CUT −0.10FTAG 0.30, better
- Worst fall
- CUT −28.2%, betterFTAG −32.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CUT 0.73FTAG 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.