Skip to content

FTAG vs KROP

First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF

FTAGCNasdaq

Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF

KROPCNasdaq

Overlap

34.7%by weight

Expense ratio

KROP −0.20pt a year

FTAG0.70%KROP0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

KROP 2.9×the volume

FTAG2.58KKROP7.36K

5Y return · a year

FTAG +12.1pt

FTAG+1.0%KROP−11.1%

FTAG vs KROP Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.2%FTAG−44.3%KROP

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FTAG +5.2%. KROP −44.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FTAG 0.70%
KROP 0.50%, better
Fund size
FTAG $14M
KROP $15M
1Y total return
FTAG +14.2%
KROP +15.4%, better
Yield (12M)
FTAG 1.18%
KROP 2.20%, better
Holdings
FTAG 58
KROP 37
Avg volume (30D)
FTAG 2.58K sh
KROP 7.36K sh, better
NAV per share
FTAG $28.65
KROP $34.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FTAG: Cost 31, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 39, Durability 44. KROP: Cost 68, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 37, Durability 24.
Pillar letters and Scores for FTAG, KROP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFTAGKROP
Cost30% weightD31B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherC42
Tradability15% weightD39HigherD37
Holdings10% weightD39HigherD37
Durability5% weightC44HigherF24

Rank among Agriculture & Food funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FTAG and KROP are both graded against the same 5 Agriculture & Food funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Agriculture & Food⁠

Category · 5 funds
See all 5 ›

KROP ranks 3rd and FTAG 4th of 5 funds in the Agriculture & Food Category.

  1. Rank 1AVEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETFScore 70
  2. Rank 2BMOOVanEck Agribusiness ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3CKROPGlobal X AgTech & Food Innovation ETFScore 49
  4. Rank 4CFTAGFirst Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 5DCUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FTAGCFirst Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF

KROPCGlobal X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF

In short

FTAG Live since 2010, FTAG owns the companies trying to squeeze more out of every acre: roughly 60 global stocks tied to improving agricultural yields, held as equities rather than grain futures.

KROP How the world feeds itself, in about 30 stocks. KROP tracks a Solactive index of global companies advancing agricultural technology and food innovation, at a 0.50% fee that sits under the typical global thematic ETF.

Stated mandate

FTAG FTAG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Indxx Global Agriculture Index. The index targets companies directly or indirectly engaged in improving agricultural yields.

KROP KROP seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in index securities or related depositary receipts and targets companies advancing agricultural technology and food innovation.

Why people hold it

  • FTAG An equity route into the farm theme. The index targets companies working to improve agricultural yields, so you hold operating businesses, not commodity futures contracts.ftportfolios.com
  • Trading since 2010, a long live history for a single-theme fund, covering more than one full swing in the global farm cycle.
  • A genuine basket, not a two-stock proxy: roughly 60 names, a global mandate by design, and distributions on a quarterly schedule.
  • KROP At least 80% of assets sit in index names, so you get the agtech and food innovation basket rather than a broad fund wearing a theme label.
  • The 0.50% expense ratio undercuts the median fee in its global thematic peer group.
  • The mandate is global, so the basket can reach farm tech and food science names listed outside the US.
  • Trading since July 2021, which gives it a multi-year operating history rather than a fresh launch.

Worth knowing

  • FTAG At 0.70% a year, it prices above the typical fund in its global thematic peer group, where index-tracking rivals such as KLMT and IQSZ run far cheaper.
  • A small asset base and light trading volume. Spreads tend to be wider than on mainstream funds, and larger orders take more care to fill.
  • One narrow theme, concentrated in about 60 stocks. Returns track crop economics and farm spending far more closely than the broad global market.
  • KROP About 30 holdings means individual names carry real weight, so one company's stumble moves the fund more than it would in a broad index.
  • Small asset base and light trading volume, which typically shows up as wider bid-ask spreads and more attention needed on order entry.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly, so cash flow from the fund is lumpy by design.

Full FTAG profile⁠

Full KROP profile⁠

FTAG vs KROP Holdings

As of

How FTAG and KROP differ

Overlap by weight

34.7%

Shared holdings make up 59.0% of KROP and 40.6% of FTAG.

Level by level

  • Asset classCommodities, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings9 in both34.7%
  • Countryby domicile56.6%
  • Sector6 Sectors58.2%

Sector

Sector weights in FTAG and KROP, widest gap first
SectorMore in FTAGMore in KROP
MaterialsFTAG +33.2 points
IndustrialsKROP +17.1 points
Consumer StaplesKROP +13.4 points
FinancialsKROP +11.2 points
Health CareFTAG +4.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryFTAG +4.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FTAG and KROP, widest gap first
CountryMore in FTAGMore in KROP
GermanyFTAG +18.3 points
United StatesKROP +17.6 points
ChinaKROP +10.2 points
IndiaFTAG +9.7 points
CanadaKROP +8.6 points
QatarFTAG +3.6 points
SingaporeFTAG +3.3 points
JapanKROP +3.0 points
Other countries (14)FTAG +4.6 points

Outside the US: FTAG 70% developed, 30% emerging. KROP 72% developed, 28% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FTAG63.5%
  • KROP74.5%

Securities held

  • FTAG53
  • KROP33

Asset class

FTAG
Commodities
KROP
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FTAG44
  • In both9
  • Only in KROP24

Only in FTAG

44 securities, 59.3% of FTAG by weight

  • Basf SE10.03%
  • Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.4.45%
  • Nutrien Ltd.4.20%

Only in KROP

24 securities, 40.9% of KROP by weight

  • Nutrien Ltd11.61%
  • Yuan Longping High-Tech Ag-A4.46%
  • Archer-Daniels-Midland Co4.07%

Weight gaps

All 9 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FTAG and KROP, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FTAGMore in KROP
Kubota CorporationKROP +7.07 points
Bayer AGFTAG +5.86 points
Lindsay CorporationLNNKROP +4.39 points
Deere & CompanyDEKROP +3.02 points
AGCO CorporationAGCOKROP +2.58 points
FMC CorporationFMCKROP +2.51 points
Vylor Inc.VYLRKROP +2.20 points
CNH Industrial N.V.CNHKROP +2.06 points

All 54 FTAG holdings⁠All 32 KROP holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FTAG vs KROP Cost

Overpaying FTAG vs KROP

$3,627

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FTAG 0.70%

    $13,606

  • KROP 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FTAG 0.70%
  • KROP 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FTAG $13,606KROP $9,979

Year by year

YearFTAGKROPOverpaying
10$1,250$900$350
20$4,760$3,460$1,300
30$13,606$9,979$3,627

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%FTAG
  • 0.50%KROP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Agriculture & Food funds
  • Median 0.56%

KROP 2nd cheapest of 5 funds

FTAG 4th cheapest of 5 funds

FTAG vs KROP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FTAG 1.18%
KROP 2.20%, better
Payout (12M)
FTAG $0.34
KROP $0.75
Last payment
FTAG $0.06
KROP $0.14
Ex-dividend
FTAG Sep 24, 2026
KROP Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
FTAG Sep 30, 2026
KROP Jul 7, 2026
Frequency
FTAG Quarterly
KROP Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FTAGQuarterly · 35 paymentsAll FTAG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 35 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 22, 2017 $0.22; Sep 21, 2017 $0.08; Dec 21, 2017 $0.05; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 21, 2018 $0.20; Sep 14, 2018 $0.09; Dec 18, 2018 $0.17; Mar 21, 2019 $0.08; Jun 14, 2019 $0.20; Sep 25, 2019 $0.23; Dec 13, 2019 $0.04; Mar 26, 2020 $0.01; Jun 25, 2020 $0.17; Sep 24, 2020 $0.16; Dec 24, 2020 $0.11; Jun 24, 2021 $0.24; Sep 23, 2021 $0.08; Dec 23, 2021 $0.16; Mar 25, 2022 $0.05; Jun 24, 2022 $0.25; Sep 23, 2022 $0.03; Dec 23, 2022 $0.17; Jun 27, 2023 $0.75; Sep 22, 2023 $0.04; Dec 22, 2023 $0.15; Mar 21, 2024 $0.02; Jun 27, 2024 $0.26; Sep 26, 2024 $0.07; Dec 13, 2024 $0.33; Jun 26, 2025 $0.20; Sep 25, 2025 $0.10; Dec 12, 2025 $0.07; Mar 26, 2026 $0.03; Jun 25, 2026 $0.18; Sep 24, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
KROPTwice a year · 7 paymentsAll KROP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.41; Jun 29, 2022 $0.17; Dec 29, 2022 $0.13; Jun 27, 2024 $0.25; Dec 30, 2024 $0.30; Dec 30, 2025 $0.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FTAG vs KROP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FTAG
  • KROP
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: KROP −58.6% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FTAG 12.8%, betterKROP 16.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FTAG 0.30, betterKROP 0.15
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FTAG −32.8%, betterKROP −58.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FTAG 0.55KROP 0.89

Popular comparisons

  • FTAGCvsVEGIA

    First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF · iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KROPCvsVEGIA

    Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF · iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTAGCvsMOOB

    First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF · VanEck Agribusiness ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.56%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KROPCvsMOOB

    Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF · VanEck Agribusiness ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.56%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTAGCvsCUTD

    First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF · Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KROPCvsCUTD

    Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF · Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.