Skip to content

CUT vs KROP

Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF

CUTDNYSE Arca

Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF

KROPCNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

KROP −0.26pt a year

CUT0.76%KROP0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

KROP 4.0×the volume

CUT1.85KKROP7.36K

5Y return · a year

CUT +8.5pt

CUT−2.6%KROP−11.1%

CUT vs KROP Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−12.2%CUT−44.3%KROP

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. CUT −12.2%. KROP −44.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CUT 0.76%
KROP 0.50%, better
Fund size
CUT $30M
KROP $15M
1Y total return
CUT +2.6%
KROP +15.4%, better
Yield (12M)
CUT 2.55%, better
KROP 2.20%
Holdings
CUT 55
KROP 37
Avg volume (30D)
CUT 1.85K sh
KROP 7.36K sh, better
NAV per share
CUT $28.18
KROP $34.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CUT: Cost 15, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 36, Holdings 68, Durability 67. KROP: Cost 68, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 37, Durability 24.
Pillar letters and Scores for CUT, KROP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCUTKROP
Cost30% weightF15B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD27C42Higher
Tradability15% weightD36D37Higher
Holdings10% weightB68HigherD37
Durability5% weightB67HigherF24

Rank among Agriculture & Food funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CUT and KROP are both graded against the same 5 Agriculture & Food funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Agriculture & Food⁠

Category · 5 funds
See all 5 ›

KROP ranks 3rd and CUT 5th of 5 funds in the Agriculture & Food Category.

  1. Rank 1AVEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETFScore 70
  2. Rank 2BMOOVanEck Agribusiness ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3CKROPGlobal X AgTech & Food Innovation ETFScore 49
  4. Rank 4CFTAGFirst Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 5DCUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CUTDInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF

KROPCGlobal X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF

In short

CUT The first timber ETF to list in the US, running since 2007. It owns the forest and the mill: timberland owners plus the companies that turn logs into lumber, paper and packaging, across developed and emerging markets.

KROP How the world feeds itself, in about 30 stocks. KROP tracks a Solactive index of global companies advancing agricultural technology and food innovation, at a 0.50% fee that sits under the typical global thematic ETF.

Stated mandate

CUT The Fund is passively managed and seeks to generally match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI ACWI IMI Timber Select Capped Index. Its mandate covers securities connected with forest ownership and management and the manufacture of timber-based products.

KROP KROP seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in index securities or related depositary receipts and targets companies advancing agricultural technology and food innovation.

Why people hold it

  • CUT Launched November 2007, ahead of every other US-listed timber fund, so it carries a full cycle of history including the housing bust.stockanalysis.com
  • A genuine timber mandate: forest and timberland owners plus makers of finished wood products. Not a broad materials fund with a few lumber names bolted on.msci.com
  • The index builds from MSCI's all-country investable market universe, so large, mid and small caps across developed and emerging markets qualify, not just US timber REITs.msci.com
  • About 50 holdings, and the index is a capped version, which limits how big any single position can get.
  • KROP At least 80% of assets sit in index names, so you get the agtech and food innovation basket rather than a broad fund wearing a theme label.
  • The 0.50% expense ratio undercuts the median fee in its global thematic peer group.
  • The mandate is global, so the basket can reach farm tech and food science names listed outside the US.
  • Trading since July 2021, which gives it a multi-year operating history rather than a fresh launch.

Worth knowing

  • CUT Costs 0.76% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027, and 0.99% without it. That sits above the category median; VEGI charges 0.39% and MOO 0.56%.
  • Assets stay small and the shares trade thinly, so bid-ask spreads can cost more than the fee on a short holding period.
  • Income lands once a year rather than quarterly, and most of the portfolio is priced in foreign currencies.
  • KROP About 30 holdings means individual names carry real weight, so one company's stumble moves the fund more than it would in a broad index.
  • Small asset base and light trading volume, which typically shows up as wider bid-ask spreads and more attention needed on order entry.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly, so cash flow from the fund is lumpy by design.

Full CUT profile⁠

Full KROP profile⁠

CUT vs KROP Holdings

As of

How CUT and KROP differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CUT and 0.0% of KROP.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector7 Sectors19.0%
  • Countryby domicile46.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CUT and KROP, widest gap first
SectorMore in CUTMore in KROP
Consumer DiscretionaryCUT +47.8 points
IndustrialsKROP +42.6 points
MaterialsCUT +24.5 points
Consumer StaplesKROP +21.6 points
FinancialsKROP +11.2 points
Real EstateCUT +8.7 points
Health CareKROP +5.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CUT and KROP, widest gap first
CountryMore in CUTMore in KROP
United StatesKROP +22.2 points
FinlandCUT +13.1 points
SwedenCUT +9.4 points
United KingdomCUT +9.3 points
ChinaKROP +9.0 points
BrazilCUT +7.3 points
CanadaKROP +6.3 points
JapanKROP +5.4 points
Other countries (17)CUT +3.7 points

Outside the US: CUT 82% developed, 18% emerging. KROP 72% developed, 28% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CUT50.6%
  • KROP74.5%

Securities held

  • CUT51
  • KROP33

Asset class

CUT
Equity
KROP
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CUT51
  • In both0
  • Only in KROP33

Only in CUT

51 securities, 99.7% of CUT by weight

  • Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA5.81%
  • Packaging Corp of America5.36%
  • Avery Dennison Corp5.29%

Only in KROP

33 securities, 100% of KROP by weight

  • Deere & Co13.76%
  • Nutrien Ltd11.61%
  • Vylor Inc11.28%

Weight gaps

CUT and KROP share no securities.

All 49 CUT holdings⁠All 32 KROP holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CUT vs KROP Cost

Overpaying CUT vs KROP

$4,677

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CUT 0.76%

    $14,656

  • KROP 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CUT 0.76%
  • KROP 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530CUT $14,656KROP $9,979

Year by year

YearCUTKROPOverpaying
10$1,353$900$453
20$5,142$3,460$1,682
30$14,656$9,979$4,677

Expense ratio

  • 0.76%CUT
  • 0.50%KROP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Agriculture & Food funds
  • Median 0.56%

KROP 2nd cheapest of 5 funds

CUT 5th cheapest of 5 funds

CUT vs KROP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CUT 2.55%, better
KROP 2.20%
Payout (12M)
CUT $0.72
KROP $0.75
Last payment
CUT $0.72
KROP $0.14
Ex-dividend
CUT Dec 22, 2025
KROP Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
CUT Dec 26, 2025
KROP Jul 7, 2026
Frequency
CUT Annual
KROP Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CUTAnnual · 9 paymentsAll CUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.50; Dec 24, 2018 $0.82; Dec 23, 2019 $0.77; Dec 21, 2020 $0.55; Dec 20, 2021 $0.58; Dec 19, 2022 $0.78; Dec 18, 2023 $0.78; Dec 23, 2024 $0.97; Dec 22, 2025 $0.72. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
KROPTwice a year · 7 paymentsAll KROP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.41; Jun 29, 2022 $0.17; Dec 29, 2022 $0.13; Jun 27, 2024 $0.25; Dec 30, 2024 $0.30; Dec 30, 2025 $0.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

CUT vs KROP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CUT
  • KROP
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: KROP −58.6% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CUT 16.1%, betterKROP 16.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CUT −0.10KROP 0.15, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CUT −28.2%, betterKROP −58.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CUT 0.73KROP 0.89

Popular comparisons

  • CUTDvsVEGIA

    Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF · iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KROPCvsVEGIA

    Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF · iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CUTDvsMOOB

    Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF · VanEck Agribusiness ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.56%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KROPCvsMOOB

    Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF · VanEck Agribusiness ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.56%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CUTDvsFTAGC

    Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF · First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KROPCvsFTAGC

    Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF · First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.