MOO ranks 2nd and FTAG 4th of 5 funds in the Agriculture & Food Category.
FTAG vs MOO
MOO −0.14pt a year
0.70%0.56%
MOO 104.5×the volume
2.58K269K
MOO +2.5pt
+4.8%+7.3%
FTAG vs MOO Performance
+5.2%−3.3%
- FTAG 0.70%
- MOO 0.56%, better
- FTAG $14M
- MOO $1.1B
- FTAG +14.2%
- MOO +17.9%, better
- FTAG 1.18%
- MOO 2.19%, better
- FTAG 58
- MOO 50
- FTAG 2.58K sh
- MOO 269K sh, better
- FTAG $28.65
- MOO $82.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTAG | MOO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | C52Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | D39 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | B67Higher |
| Durability | C44 | A75Higher |
Rank among Agriculture & Food funds
Same Category. FTAG and MOO are both graded against the same 5 Agriculture & Food funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTAGC
MOOB
In short
FTAG Live since 2010, FTAG owns the companies trying to squeeze more out of every acre: roughly 60 global stocks tied to improving agricultural yields, held as equities rather than grain futures.
MOO The farm trade without the futures market. MOO holds a global basket of about 60 stocks spanning seed, fertilizer, tractors, livestock and aquaculture, and it has been tracking that theme since 2007.
Stated mandate
FTAG FTAG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Indxx Global Agriculture Index. The index targets companies directly or indirectly engaged in improving agricultural yields.
MOO The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. It uses a passive indexing approach and generally replicates the Index with securities of agribusiness companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTAG vs MOO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTAG vs MOO Cost
Overpaying FTAG vs MOO
$2,518
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTAG 0.70%
$13,606
MOO 0.56%
$11,088
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTAG | MOO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $1,006 | $244 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $3,855 | $905 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $11,088 | $2,518 |
- 0.70%FTAG
- 0.56%MOO, cheaper
- Middle half of Agriculture & Food funds
- Median 0.56%
MOO 3rd cheapest of 5 funds
FTAG 4th cheapest of 5 funds
FTAG vs MOO Dividends
- FTAG 1.18%
- MOO 2.19%, better
- FTAG $0.34
- MOO $1.80
- FTAG $0.06
- MOO $1.80
- FTAG Sep 24, 2026
- MOO Dec 22, 2025
- FTAG Sep 30, 2026
- MOO Dec 26, 2025
- FTAG Quarterly
- MOO Annual
Distribution history
FTAG vs MOO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTAG
- MOO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTAG 12.8%, betterMOO 14.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTAG 0.30, betterMOO 0.25
- Worst fall
- FTAG −32.8%, betterMOO −39.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FTAG 0.55MOO 0.60
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.