Skip to content

FTAG vs MOO

First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF

FTAGCNasdaq

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

MOOBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

MOO −0.14pt a year

FTAG0.70%MOO0.56%

Avg volume · 30D

MOO 104.5×the volume

FTAG2.58KMOO269K

10Y return · a year

MOO +2.5pt

FTAG+4.8%MOO+7.3%

FTAG vs MOO Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.2%FTAG−3.3%MOO

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FTAG +5.2%. MOO −3.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%10%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FTAG 0.70%
MOO 0.56%, better
Fund size
FTAG $14M
MOO $1.1B
1Y total return
FTAG +14.2%
MOO +17.9%, better
Yield (12M)
FTAG 1.18%
MOO 2.19%, better
Holdings
FTAG 58
MOO 50
Avg volume (30D)
FTAG 2.58K sh
MOO 269K sh, better
NAV per share
FTAG $28.65
MOO $82.03
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FTAG: Cost 31, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 39, Durability 44. MOO: Cost 52, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 86, Holdings 67, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for FTAG, MOO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFTAGMOO
Cost30% weightD31C52Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherB62
Tradability15% weightD39A86Higher
Holdings10% weightD39B67Higher
Durability5% weightC44A75Higher

Rank among Agriculture & Food funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FTAG and MOO are both graded against the same 5 Agriculture & Food funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Agriculture & Food⁠

Category · 5 funds
See all 5 ›

MOO ranks 2nd and FTAG 4th of 5 funds in the Agriculture & Food Category.

  1. Rank 1AVEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETFScore 70
  2. Rank 2BMOOVanEck Agribusiness ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3CKROPGlobal X AgTech & Food Innovation ETFScore 49
  4. Rank 4CFTAGFirst Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 5DCUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FTAGCFirst Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF

MOOBVanEck Agribusiness ETF

In short

FTAG Live since 2010, FTAG owns the companies trying to squeeze more out of every acre: roughly 60 global stocks tied to improving agricultural yields, held as equities rather than grain futures.

MOO The farm trade without the futures market. MOO holds a global basket of about 60 stocks spanning seed, fertilizer, tractors, livestock and aquaculture, and it has been tracking that theme since 2007.

Stated mandate

FTAG FTAG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Indxx Global Agriculture Index. The index targets companies directly or indirectly engaged in improving agricultural yields.

MOO The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. It uses a passive indexing approach and generally replicates the Index with securities of agribusiness companies.

Why people hold it

  • FTAG An equity route into the farm theme. The index targets companies working to improve agricultural yields, so you hold operating businesses, not commodity futures contracts.ftportfolios.com
  • Trading since 2010, a long live history for a single-theme fund, covering more than one full swing in the global farm cycle.
  • A genuine basket, not a two-stock proxy: roughly 60 names, a global mandate by design, and distributions on a quarterly schedule.
  • MOO Covers the whole chain, not just fertilizer: agricultural inputs, equipment, production, aquaculture, livestock and crop trading all sit in the same index.vaneck.com
  • Global mandate, so European and emerging-market ag names are in scope alongside US farm giants.vaneck.com
  • Owns companies, not commodity futures. A plain 1940 Act stock fund means no roll schedule and no partnership tax paperwork.
  • The 0.56% expense ratio lands right at the median for global thematic funds, and it is one of the easier funds in that group to get in and out of.

Worth knowing

  • FTAG At 0.70% a year, it prices above the typical fund in its global thematic peer group, where index-tracking rivals such as KLMT and IQSZ run far cheaper.
  • A small asset base and light trading volume. Spreads tend to be wider than on mainstream funds, and larger orders take more care to fill.
  • One narrow theme, concentrated in about 60 stocks. Returns track crop economics and farm spending far more closely than the broad global market.
  • MOO About 60 stocks in one theme. A handful of large seed, fertilizer and machinery names steer the fund, and farm capex cycles steer them.
  • Broad global thematic index funds such as KLMT charge a fraction of 0.56%, though they buy the whole market rather than the food chain.
  • Cash comes back once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full FTAG profile⁠

Full MOO profile⁠

FTAG vs MOO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FTAG vs MOO Cost

Overpaying FTAG vs MOO

$2,518

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FTAG 0.70%

    $13,606

  • MOO 0.56%

    $11,088

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FTAG 0.70%
  • MOO 0.56%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FTAG $13,606MOO $11,088

Year by year

YearFTAGMOOOverpaying
10$1,250$1,006$244
20$4,760$3,855$905
30$13,606$11,088$2,518

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%FTAG
  • 0.56%MOO, cheaper
  • Middle half of Agriculture & Food funds
  • Median 0.56%

MOO 3rd cheapest of 5 funds

FTAG 4th cheapest of 5 funds

FTAG vs MOO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FTAG 1.18%
MOO 2.19%, better
Payout (12M)
FTAG $0.34
MOO $1.80
Last payment
FTAG $0.06
MOO $1.80
Ex-dividend
FTAG Sep 24, 2026
MOO Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
FTAG Sep 30, 2026
MOO Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
FTAG Quarterly
MOO Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FTAGQuarterly · 35 paymentsAll FTAG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 35 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 22, 2017 $0.22; Sep 21, 2017 $0.08; Dec 21, 2017 $0.05; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 21, 2018 $0.20; Sep 14, 2018 $0.09; Dec 18, 2018 $0.17; Mar 21, 2019 $0.08; Jun 14, 2019 $0.20; Sep 25, 2019 $0.23; Dec 13, 2019 $0.04; Mar 26, 2020 $0.01; Jun 25, 2020 $0.17; Sep 24, 2020 $0.16; Dec 24, 2020 $0.11; Jun 24, 2021 $0.24; Sep 23, 2021 $0.08; Dec 23, 2021 $0.16; Mar 25, 2022 $0.05; Jun 24, 2022 $0.25; Sep 23, 2022 $0.03; Dec 23, 2022 $0.17; Jun 27, 2023 $0.75; Sep 22, 2023 $0.04; Dec 22, 2023 $0.15; Mar 21, 2024 $0.02; Jun 27, 2024 $0.26; Sep 26, 2024 $0.07; Dec 13, 2024 $0.33; Jun 26, 2025 $0.20; Sep 25, 2025 $0.10; Dec 12, 2025 $0.07; Mar 26, 2026 $0.03; Jun 25, 2026 $0.18; Sep 24, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
MOOAnnual · 10 paymentsAll MOO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.88; Dec 20, 2018 $0.96; Dec 23, 2019 $0.91; Dec 21, 2020 $0.86; Dec 20, 2021 $1.10; Dec 29, 2021 $0.02; Dec 19, 2022 $1.85; Dec 18, 2023 $2.24; Dec 23, 2024 $2.20; Dec 22, 2025 $1.80. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

FTAG vs MOO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FTAG
  • MOO
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: MOO −39.5% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FTAG 12.8%, betterMOO 14.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FTAG 0.30, betterMOO 0.25
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FTAG −32.8%, betterMOO −39.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FTAG 0.55MOO 0.60

Popular comparisons

  • FTAGCvsVEGIA

    First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF · iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOOBvsVEGIA

    VanEck Agribusiness ETF · iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTAGCvsKROPC

    First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF · Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOOBvsKROPC

    VanEck Agribusiness ETF · Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTAGCvsCUTD

    First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF · Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOOBvsCUTD

    VanEck Agribusiness ETF · Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.