FELG ranks 4th and CWS 54th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
CWS vs FELG
2.2%by weight
FELG −0.47pt a year
0.65%0.18%
FELG 68.1×the volume
5.57K379K
CWS vs FELG Performance
0.0%−0.5%
- CWS 0.65%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- CWS $111M
- FELG $5.78B
- CWS 0.0%, better
- FELG −0.5%
- CWS 0.31%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- CWS 26
- FELG 133
- CWS 5.57K sh
- FELG 379K sh, better
- CWS $67.11
- FELG $42.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CWS | FELG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A82Higher |
| Risk | B59Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | B56 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | B60Higher | C52 |
| Durability | B64 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. CWS and FELG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CWSC
FELGA
In short
CWS Most active large-cap funds own hundreds of names and end up shadowing the index. CWS runs a focused book of roughly two dozen US stocks against the S&P 500, so individual picks actually move the needle.
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
Stated mandate
CWS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, focused portfolio of primarily U.S.-listed equity securities.
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CWS vs FELG Holdings
How CWS and FELG differ
2.2%
Shared holdings make up 21.3% of CWS and 2.2% of FELG.
Level by level
- Holdings2.2%
- Sector45.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in CWSMore in FELG | CWS | FELG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | FELG +39.4 points | 19.3% | 58.7% |
| Health Care | CWS +21.8 points | 27.9% | 6.1% |
| Communication | FELG +14.6 points | 0.0% | 14.6% |
| Industrials | CWS +14.4 points | 22.3% | 7.9% |
| Financials | CWS +6.1 points | 11.6% | 5.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | CWS +5.0 points | 11.3% | 6.4% |
| Utilities | CWS +4.1 points | 4.1% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | CWS +3.4 points | 3.5% | 0.1% |
| Materials | FELG +0.5 points | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Energy | FELG +0.2 points | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Real Estate | FELG +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CWSMore in FELG | CWS | FELG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CWS49.7%
- FELG57.6%
- CWS26
- FELG131
Asset class
- CWS
- Equity
- FELG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CWS21
- In both5
- Only in FELG126
Only in CWS
21 securities, 78.8% of CWS by weight
- Science Applications Inte6.12%
- Mckesson Corp5.02%
- Casey's General Stores Inc5.02%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc4.99%
- Factset Research Systems Inc4.69%
- Henry Schein Inc4.59%
- American Water Works Co Inc4.52%
- Allison Transmission Holding4.47%
- Intercontinental Exchange In4.28%
- Ies Holdings Inc4.27%
- Moody's Corp4.08%
- Resmed Inc3.91%
- Mueller Industries Inc3.83%
- Abbott Laboratories3.51%
- Stryker Corp3.41%
- Broadridge Financial Solutio3.25%
- Sprouts Farmers Market Inc2.59%
- Rollins Inc2.36%
- Intuit Inc2.11%
- Fair Isaac Corp1.70%
- BlackRock Treasury Trust Instl 620.14%
Only in FELG
126 securities, 97.1% of FELG by weight
- NVIDIA Corp15.60%
- Apple Inc8.80%
- Alphabet Inc Class A6.48%
- Microsoft Corp5.40%
- Broadcom Inc4.65%
- Eli Lilly & Co3.90%
- Micron Technology Inc3.69%
- Meta Platforms Inc Class A3.43%
- Tesla Inc3.02%
- Alphabet Inc Class C2.61%
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.28%
- Mastercard Inc Class A1.87%
- Visa Inc Class A1.54%
- Ge Aerospace1.44%
- Texas Instruments Inc1.42%
- Applied Materials Inc1.22%
- Ge Vernova Inc1.20%
- Palantir Technologies Inc1.02%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc0.98%
- Caterpillar Inc0.94%
- Western Digital Corp0.93%
- Netflix Inc0.88%
- Sandisk Corporation0.84%
- Trane Technologies PLC0.80%
- Kla Corp0.78%
- Airbnb Inc Class A0.75%
- Fortinet Inc0.67%
- Lam Research Corp0.63%
- Expedia Inc0.63%
- Amazon.com Inc0.58%
- Gilead Sciences Inc0.56%
- Snowflake Inc0.55%
- Uber Technologies Inc0.55%
- Howmet Aerospace Inc0.55%
- Atlassian Corp PLC Cls A0.54%
- Schwab Charles Corp0.53%
- Bank of New York Mellon Corp0.53%
- Rtx Corp0.52%
- Ecolab Inc0.52%
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co0.51%
- Bank of America Corporation0.51%
- Maplebear Inc0.49%
- Keysight Technologies Inc0.47%
- Unity Software Inc0.47%
- Cisco Systems Inc0.46%
- Hubspot Inc0.45%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc0.40%
- Ciena Corp0.39%
- Seagate Techn Holdings PLC0.38%
- Chime Financial Inc0.37%
Weight gaps
All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in CWSMore in FELG | CWS | FELG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comfort Systems Usa Inc | CWS +4.96 points | 5.47% | 0.51% |
| Heico Corp | CWS +4.02 points | 4.02% | <0.01% |
| Cencora Inc | CWS +3.96 points | 4.03% | 0.07% |
| Amphenol Corp-Cl A | CWS +3.90 points | 4.80% | 0.90% |
| Adobe Inc | CWS +2.18 points | 2.94% | 0.76% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CWS vs FELG Cost
Overpaying CWS vs FELG
$8,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CWS 0.65%
$12,717
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CWS | FELG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $328 | $835 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,281 | $3,159 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,749 | $8,968 |
- 0.65%CWS
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
CWS 65th cheapest of 90 funds
CWS vs FELG Dividends
- CWS 0.31%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- CWS $0.21
- FELG $0.16
- CWS $0.21
- FELG $0.04
- CWS Dec 22, 2025
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- CWS Dec 29, 2025
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- CWS Annual
- FELG Quarterly
Distribution history
CWS vs FELG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CWS 14.7%FELG 16.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- CWS 0.49FELG 0.93
- Worst fall
- CWS −24.9%FELG −23.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CWS 0.93FELG 1.23
CWS and FELG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
