JUSA ranks 1st and CWS 54th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
CWS vs JUSA
JUSA −0.47pt a year
0.65%0.18%
JUSA 17.7×the volume
5.57K98.8K
CWS vs JUSA Performance
0.0%+10.8%
- CWS 0.65%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- CWS $111M
- JUSA $745M
- CWS 0.0%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- CWS 0.31%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- CWS 26
- JUSA 263
- CWS 5.57K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- CWS $67.11
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CWS | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A84Higher |
| Risk | B59 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. CWS and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CWSC
JUSAA
In short
CWS Most active large-cap funds own hundreds of names and end up shadowing the index. CWS runs a focused book of roughly two dozen US stocks against the S&P 500, so individual picks actually move the needle.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
CWS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, focused portfolio of primarily U.S.-listed equity securities.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CWS vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CWS vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying CWS vs JUSA
$8,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CWS 0.65%
$12,717
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CWS | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $328 | $835 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,281 | $3,159 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,749 | $8,968 |
- 0.65%CWS
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
CWS 65th cheapest of 90 funds
CWS vs JUSA Dividends
- CWS 0.31%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- CWS $0.21
- JUSA $0.49
- CWS $0.21
- JUSA $0.13
- CWS Dec 22, 2025
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- CWS Dec 29, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- CWS Annual
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
CWS vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CWS 14.7%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CWS 0.49JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- CWS −24.9%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CWS 0.93JUSA 0.98
CWS and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

