Skip to content

DAK vs JUSA

Dakota Active Equity ETF

DAKBNasdaq

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.25pt a year

DAK0.43%JUSA0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 168.8×the volume

DAK585JUSA98.8K

DAK vs JUSA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.2%DAK+10.8%JUSA

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DAK +11.2%. JUSA +10.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DAK 0.43%
JUSA 0.18%, better
Fund size
DAK $43M
JUSA $745M
1Y total return
DAK +11.2%, better
JUSA +10.8%
Yield (12M)
DAK 0.82%, better
JUSA 0.72%
Holdings
DAK 69
JUSA 263
Avg volume (30D)
DAK 585 sh
JUSA 98.8K sh, better
NAV per share
DAK $29.39
JUSA $67.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DAK: Cost 74, Risk 93, Mission not scored, Tradability 21, Holdings 82, Durability 20. JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 58, Holdings 84, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for DAK, JUSA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDAKJUSA
Cost30% weightA74A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA84
Risk15% weightA93HigherA92
Tradability15% weightF21B58Higher
Holdings10% weightA82A84Higher
Durability5% weightF20A76Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DAK and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and DAK 18th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 16BNSIGNorth Square Growth Opportunities ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 18BDAKDakota Active Equity ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 18BLGROLevel Four Large Cap Growth Active ETFScore 64

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DAKBDakota Active Equity ETF

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

In short

DAK No data

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

DAK No data

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

Why people hold it

DAK No data

  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.

Worth knowing

DAK No data

  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com

Full DAK profile⁠

Full JUSA profile⁠

DAK vs JUSA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DAK vs JUSA Cost

Overpaying DAK vs JUSA

$4,913

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DAK 0.43%

    $8,662

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DAK 0.43%
  • JUSA 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530DAK $8,662JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearDAKJUSAOverpaying
10$776$328$448
20$2,994$1,281$1,713
30$8,662$3,749$4,913

Expense ratio

  • 0.43%DAK
  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

DAK 23rd cheapest of 90 funds

DAK vs JUSA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DAK 0.82%, better
JUSA 0.72%
Payout (12M)
DAK $0.24
JUSA $0.49
Last payment
DAK $0.06
JUSA $0.13
Ex-dividend
DAK Sep 28, 2026
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
DAK Sep 30, 2026
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
DAK Quarterly
JUSA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

DAKQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll DAK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Sep 29, 2025 $0.04; Dec 23, 2025 $0.08; Mar 30, 2026 $0.05; Jun 29, 2026 $0.06; Sep 28, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

DAK vs JUSA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DAK 11.6%since Aug 2025JUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DAK 0.97since Aug 2025JUSA 1.41since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DAK −7.9%since Jul 2025JUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DAK 0.95JUSA 0.98

DAK and JUSA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DAKBvsGUSEA

    Dakota Active Equity ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.43% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DAKBvsLRGCA

    Dakota Active Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.43% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DAKBvsFELGA

    Dakota Active Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.43% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.