Skip to content
etf.net

DAK vs LRGC

Dakota Active Equity ETF

DAKBNasdaq

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.04pt a year

DAK0.43%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 58.2×the volume

DAK585LRGC34.1K

DAK vs LRGC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.2%DAK+9.5%LRGC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DAK +11.2%. LRGC +9.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DAK 0.43%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
DAK $43M
LRGC $1.37B
1Y total return
DAK +11.2%, better
LRGC +9.5%
Yield (12M)
DAK 0.82%, better
LRGC 0.53%
Holdings
DAK 69
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
DAK 585 sh
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
NAV per share
DAK $29.39
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DAK: Cost 74, Risk 93, Mission not scored, Tradability 21, Holdings 82, Durability 20. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for DAK, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDAKLRGC
Cost30% weightA74A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightA93HigherA90
Tradability15% weightF21A75Higher
Holdings10% weightA82HigherA77
Durability5% weightF20A78Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DAK and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and DAK 18th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 16BNSIGNorth Square Growth Opportunities ETFScore 65
  6. Rank 18BDAKDakota Active Equity ETFScore 64
  7. Rank 18BLGROLevel Four Large Cap Growth Active ETFScore 64

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DAKBDakota Active Equity ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

DAK No data

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

DAK No data

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

DAK No data

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

DAK No data

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full DAK profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

DAK vs LRGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DAK vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying DAK vs LRGC

$764

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DAK 0.43%

    $8,662

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DAK 0.43%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530DAK $8,662LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearDAKLRGCOverpaying
10$776$705$71
20$2,994$2,725$269
30$8,662$7,898$764

Expense ratio

  • 0.43%DAK
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

DAK 23rd cheapest of 90 funds

DAK vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DAK 0.82%, better
LRGC 0.53%
Payout (12M)
DAK $0.24
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
DAK $0.06
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
DAK Sep 28, 2026
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
DAK Sep 30, 2026
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
DAK Quarterly
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

DAKQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll DAK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 29, 2025 $0.04; Dec 23, 2025 $0.08; Mar 30, 2026 $0.05; Jun 29, 2026 $0.06; Sep 28, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

DAK vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DAK 11.6%since Aug 2025LRGC 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DAK 0.97since Aug 2025LRGC 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DAK −7.9%since Jul 2025LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DAK 0.95LRGC 1.00

DAK and LRGC in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • DAKBvsJUSAA

    Dakota Active Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.43% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DAKBvsGUSEA

    Dakota Active Equity ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.43% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DAKBvsFELGA

    Dakota Active Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.43% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.