DBO ranks 3rd and UNG 9th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
DBO vs UNG
DBO −0.36pt a year
0.81%1.17%
UNG 35.4×the volume
482K17.1M
DBO +37.4pt
+14.1%−23.3%
DBO vs UNG Performance
+104.2%−87.7%
- DBO 0.81%, better
- UNG 1.17%
- DBO $330M
- UNG $503M
- DBO +111.8%, better
- UNG −31.5%
- DBO 1.58%
- UNG
- DBO 4
- UNG 11
- DBO 482K sh
- UNG 17.1M sh, better
- DBO $27.27
- UNG $9.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DBO | UNG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74Higher | F21 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | B64 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | B64 |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. DBO and UNG are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DBOB
UNGD
In short
DBO Oil exposure with a roll rule. DBO tracks a WTI crude futures index whose Optimum Yield design shops across contract months instead of camping in the front month, and it has run that way since 2007.
UNG The energy-futures aisle is mostly crude; UNG is the natural gas one. Live since 2007, it tracks the daily percentage move in Henry Hub gas through a short-dated futures benchmark, not the spot price quoted on TV.
Stated mandate
DBO The fund seeks to track positive or negative changes in the level of the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return.
UNG UNG seeks to reflect the daily percentage change in the price of natural gas delivered at Henry Hub, Louisiana, through a specified short-term benchmark futures contract, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DBO vs UNG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DBO vs UNG Cost
Overpaying UNG vs DBO
$5,870
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DBO 0.81%
$15,518
UNG 1.17%
$21,388
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DBO | UNG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,439 | $2,048 | $609 |
| 20 | $5,456 | $7,639 | $2,183 |
| 30 | $15,518 | $21,388 | $5,870 |
- 0.81%DBO, cheaper
- 1.17%UNG
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
DBO 3rd cheapest of 11 funds
UNG 9th cheapest of 11 funds
DBO vs UNG Dividends
- DBO 1.58%
- UNG
- DBO $0.43
- UNG None
- DBO $0.43
- UNG
- DBO Dec 22, 2025
- UNG
- DBO Dec 26, 2025
- UNG
- DBO Annual
- UNG
Distribution history
DBO vs UNG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DBO
- UNG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DBO 33.8%, betterUNG 53.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- DBO 0.63, betterUNG −0.56
- Worst fall
- DBO −37.7%, betterUNG −93.3%
- Market sensitivity
- DBO 1.77UNG 1.70
DBO and UNG in the news



Category Rankings
Chips, AI and crypto took October's losses



Popular comparisons
- 0.81% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.