OILK ranks 1st and UNG 9th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
OILK vs UNG
0.0%by weight
OILK −0.47pt a year
0.70%1.17%
UNG 151.2×the volume
113K17.1M
OILK +29.4pt
+6.1%−23.3%
OILK vs UNG Performance
+130.6%−87.7%
- OILK 0.70%, better
- UNG 1.17%
- OILK $259M
- UNG $503M
- OILK +89.1%, better
- UNG −31.5%
- OILK 15.32%
- UNG
- OILK 2
- UNG 11
- OILK 113K sh
- UNG 17.1M sh, better
- OILK $62.65
- UNG $9.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OILK | UNG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F21 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | D28 | |
| Durability | A72Higher | B64 |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. OILK and UNG are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OILKA
UNGD
In short
OILK The only crude oil ETF that spares you a Schedule K-1. OILK sends a 1099 instead, and its index spreads WTI futures across three roll schedules rather than camping in the front month. All-in cost: 0.70%.
UNG The energy-futures aisle is mostly crude; UNG is the natural gas one. Live since 2007, it tracks the daily percentage move in Henry Hub gas through a short-dated futures benchmark, not the spot price quoted on TV.
Stated mandate
OILK The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil IndexSM.
UNG UNG seeks to reflect the daily percentage change in the price of natural gas delivered at Henry Hub, Louisiana, through a specified short-term benchmark futures contract, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OILK vs UNG Holdings
How OILK and UNG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of OILK and 0.0% of UNG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for UNG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in OILKMore in UNG | OILK | UNG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- OILK100.0%
- UNG98.1%
- OILK1
- UNG9
Asset class
- OILK
- Commodities
- UNG
- Commodities
Holdings
- Only in OILK1
- In both0
- Only in UNG9
Only in OILK
1 security, 69.0% of OILK by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf68.98%
Only in UNG
9 securities, 79.2% of UNG by weight
- NATURAL GAS FUTR Dec2641.54%
- Drey Inst Pref Gov Mm Inst 654611.72%
- Treasury Bill 0 2/4/20276.08%
- Treasury Bill 0 2/11/20276.08%
- Trs Soc Gen SGIXCNG1 092520263.81%
- Trs Scotia SNOVNG1 083120263.69%
- Treasury Bill 0 12/24/20262.18%
- Treasury Bill 0 12/31/20262.18%
- Treasury Bill 0 11/3/20261.93%
Weight gaps
OILK and UNG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OILK vs UNG Cost
Overpaying UNG vs OILK
$7,782
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OILK 0.70%
$13,606
UNG 1.17%
$21,388
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OILK | UNG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $2,048 | $798 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $7,639 | $2,879 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $21,388 | $7,782 |
- 0.70%OILK, cheaper
- 1.17%UNG
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
OILK cheapest of 11 funds
UNG 9th cheapest of 11 funds
OILK vs UNG Dividends
- OILK 15.32%
- UNG
- OILK $9.54
- UNG None
- OILK $2.57
- UNG
- OILK Oct 1, 2026
- UNG
- OILK Oct 7, 2026
- UNG
- OILK Monthly
- UNG
Distribution history
OILK vs UNG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- OILK
- UNG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OILK 26.3%, betterUNG 53.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- OILK 0.65, betterUNG −0.56
- Worst fall
- OILK −34.6%, betterUNG −93.3%
- Market sensitivity
- OILK 1.37UNG 1.70
OILK and UNG in the news



Category Rankings
Chips, AI and crypto took October's losses



Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.