DBO ranks 3rd and USO 4th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
DBO vs USO
DBO −0.05pt a year
0.81%0.86%
USO 11.9×the volume
482K5.73M
DBO +6.9pt
+14.1%+7.2%
DBO vs USO Performance
+104.2%+195.4%
- DBO 0.81%, better
- USO 0.86%
- DBO $330M
- USO $1.95B
- DBO +111.8%
- USO +132.7%, better
- DBO 1.58%
- USO
- DBO 4
- USO 17
- DBO 482K sh
- USO 5.73M sh, better
- DBO $27.27
- USO $170.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DBO | USO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74Higher | B65 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | B66 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | A100Higher |
| Durability | B69 | A71Higher |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. DBO and USO are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DBOB
USOB
In short
DBO Oil exposure with a roll rule. DBO tracks a WTI crude futures index whose Optimum Yield design shops across contract months instead of camping in the front month, and it has run that way since 2007.
USO The original US crude oil ETF, trading since 2006 and still one of the busiest ways to get WTI exposure without opening a futures account. It holds oil futures near the front of the curve, not barrels in a tank.
Stated mandate
DBO The fund seeks to track positive or negative changes in the level of the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return.
USO USO seeks daily NAV percentage changes that reflect changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, measured by the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DBO vs USO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DBO vs USO Cost
Overpaying USO vs DBO
$850
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DBO 0.81%
$15,518
USO 0.86%
$16,368
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DBO | USO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,439 | $1,525 | $86 |
| 20 | $5,456 | $5,768 | $312 |
| 30 | $15,518 | $16,368 | $850 |
- 0.81%DBO, cheaper
- 0.86%USO
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
DBO 3rd cheapest of 11 funds
USO 4th cheapest of 11 funds
DBO vs USO Dividends
- DBO 1.58%
- USO
- DBO $0.43
- USO None
- DBO $0.43
- USO
- DBO Dec 22, 2025
- USO
- DBO Dec 26, 2025
- USO
- DBO Annual
- USO
Distribution history
DBO vs USO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DBO
- USO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DBO 33.8%, betterUSO 43.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- DBO 0.63USO 0.71, better
- Worst fall
- DBO −37.7%USO −36.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DBO 1.77USO 2.22
DBO and USO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.81% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





