Skip to content

DDNQ vs PQJA

Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF

DDNQCCboe

PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

PQJABNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

PQJA −0.29pt a year

DDNQ0.79%PQJA0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

DDNQ 2.8×the volume

DDNQ14.2KPQJA5.11K

DDNQ vs PQJA Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−3.9%DDNQ−0.5%PQJA

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. DDNQ −3.9%. PQJA −0.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−8%−6%−2%2%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DDNQ 0.79%
PQJA 0.50%, better
Fund size
DDNQ $27M
PQJA $34M
1Y total return
DDNQ No data
PQJA +12.6%
Holdings
DDNQ 4
PQJA 4
Avg volume (30D)
DDNQ 14.2K sh, better
PQJA 5.11K sh
NAV per share
DDNQ $19.36
PQJA $31.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DDNQ: Cost 46, Risk 27, Mission 78, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. PQJA: Cost 76, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings not scored, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for DDNQ, PQJA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDDNQPQJA
Cost30% weightC46A76Higher
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightD27B62Higher
Tradability15% weightC46HigherD39
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD38C49Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DDNQ and PQJA are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

PQJA ranks 3rd and DDNQ 10th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  4. Rank 4BPQOCPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - OctoberScore 58
  5. Rank 9CQJUNFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - JuneScore 44
  6. Rank 10CDDNQInnovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 10CQSPTFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DDNQCInnovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF

PQJABPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

In short

DDNQ Most Nasdaq-100 buffer funds only cushion small drops. DDNQ is built to get paid for them: if its Nasdaq-100 reference dips within the 5% buffer, that decline can register as a positive return, with the upside capped and the terms reset each quarter.

PQJA A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100: PQJA absorbs the first 12% of price losses on the index's flagship ETF and gives up gains above a cap in exchange. A deeper cushion than most of its buffer peers, at 0.50% a year.

Stated mandate

DDNQ The Fund seeks capital appreciation through a defined-outcome strategy based on the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1. It seeks positive returns when the reference ETF rises or falls modestly, while applying an upside cap and a 5% loss buffer for larger declines.

PQJA The Fund seeks to match QQQ’s price return up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 12% of QQQ losses over a one-year target outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • DDNQ The dual directional twist: per the prospectus, a modest decline in the reference ETF can count as a positive return, up to the 5% buffer, instead of just being absorbed.innovatoretfs.com
  • Outcome periods run a quarter at a time, so cap and buffer terms are reset four times a year rather than locked in annually.innovatoretfs.com
  • Defined-outcome math inside a plain 1940 Act ETF on QQQ, not a bank-issued structured note.
  • The 0.79% expense ratio lands right at the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer funds, so the unusual payoff shape does not come with an above-group fee.
  • PQJA Cushions the first 12% of the tracked Nasdaq-100 ETF's price losses over each one-year outcome period, deeper than the 10-point buffer on Innovator's QBUF.pgim.com
  • Charges 0.50% a year against a 0.79% median for its Nasdaq-100 buffer cohort, where QBUF sits at 0.79%.
  • January is one of four PGIM Nasdaq-100 buffer funds on a quarterly calendar (PQAP, PQJL, PQOC), so outcome periods aren't tied to a single start month.
  • Launched in 2024 and rated in the upper half of its shallow-buffer Nasdaq-100 group on our review.

Worth knowing

  • DDNQ The buffer is 5%, thin next to the 12% and full-protection options in the group. Past a 5% drop over the period, further losses pass through.
  • Upside is capped every period, and the cap is set anew at each reset, so a big Nasdaq-100 run gets clipped. The stated outcomes assume you hold a full period.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper ways into this cohort exist (PBQQ at 0.50%, the Calamos funds at 0.69%), and DDNQ launched in 2026, so it is early in building assets and trading depth.
  • PQJA Upside stops at a cap that resets with each new one-year period, and the mandate follows price return, so index dividends aren't part of the payoff.
  • The 12% buffer and the cap are measured across a full outcome period. Buy partway through and your effective cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.pgim.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund next to the largest buffer products, which can show up as wider bid-ask spreads.

Full DDNQ profile⁠

Full PQJA profile⁠

DDNQ vs PQJA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DDNQ vs PQJA Cost

Overpaying DDNQ vs PQJA

$5,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DDNQ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PQJA 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DDNQ 0.79%
  • PQJA 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DDNQ $15,174PQJA $9,979

Year by year

YearDDNQPQJAOverpaying
10$1,405$900$505
20$5,331$3,460$1,871
30$15,174$9,979$5,195

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%DDNQ
  • 0.50%PQJA, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PQJA 2nd cheapest of 12 funds

DDNQ 6th cheapest of 12 funds

DDNQ vs PQJA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
DDNQ None
PQJA No data
Last payment
DDNQ No data
PQJA $0.0015
Ex-dividend
DDNQ No data
PQJA Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
DDNQ No data
PQJA Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
DDNQ No data
PQJA Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

DDNQAll DDNQ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PQJAIrregular · 1 paymentAll PQJA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.0015. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0012026YTD

DDNQ vs PQJA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DDNQ No dataPQJA 10.0%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DDNQ No dataPQJA 0.99since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DDNQ No dataPQJA −14.7%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DDNQ 0.49PQJA 0.75

Popular comparisons

  • DDNQCvsPQAPB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQJABvsPQAPB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDNQCvsQTRB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQJABvsQTRB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDNQCvsPQOCB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQJABvsPQOCB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.