PQJA ranks 3rd and DDNQ 10th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.
DDNQ vs PQJA
PQJA −0.29pt a year
0.79%0.50%
DDNQ 2.8×the volume
14.2K5.11K
DDNQ vs PQJA Performance
−3.9%−0.5%
- DDNQ 0.79%
- PQJA 0.50%, better
- DDNQ $27M
- PQJA $34M
- DDNQ
- PQJA +12.6%
- DDNQ 4
- PQJA 4
- DDNQ 14.2K sh, better
- PQJA 5.11K sh
- DDNQ $19.36
- PQJA $31.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDNQ | PQJA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | D27 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | C46Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38 | C49Higher |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. DDNQ and PQJA are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDNQC
PQJAB
In short
DDNQ Most Nasdaq-100 buffer funds only cushion small drops. DDNQ is built to get paid for them: if its Nasdaq-100 reference dips within the 5% buffer, that decline can register as a positive return, with the upside capped and the terms reset each quarter.
PQJA A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100: PQJA absorbs the first 12% of price losses on the index's flagship ETF and gives up gains above a cap in exchange. A deeper cushion than most of its buffer peers, at 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
DDNQ The Fund seeks capital appreciation through a defined-outcome strategy based on the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1. It seeks positive returns when the reference ETF rises or falls modestly, while applying an upside cap and a 5% loss buffer for larger declines.
PQJA The Fund seeks to match QQQ’s price return up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 12% of QQQ losses over a one-year target outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDNQ vs PQJA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDNQ vs PQJA Cost
Overpaying DDNQ vs PQJA
$5,195
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDNQ 0.79%
$15,174
PQJA 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDNQ | PQJA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $900 | $505 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,460 | $1,871 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,979 | $5,195 |
- 0.79%DDNQ
- 0.50%PQJA, cheaper
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
PQJA 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
DDNQ 6th cheapest of 12 funds
DDNQ vs PQJA Dividends
- DDNQ None
- PQJA
- DDNQ
- PQJA $0.0015
- DDNQ
- PQJA Dec 30, 2025
- DDNQ
- PQJA Jan 2, 2026
- DDNQ
- PQJA Irregular
Distribution history
DDNQ vs PQJA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DDNQ PQJA 10.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- DDNQ PQJA 0.99
- Worst fall
- DDNQ PQJA −14.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DDNQ 0.49PQJA 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.