Skip to content

DDNQ vs QTR

Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF

DDNQCCboe

Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

QTRBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

QTR −0.54pt a year

DDNQ0.79%QTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

DDNQ 8.9×the volume

DDNQ14.2KQTR1.59K

DDNQ vs QTR Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−3.9%DDNQ−6.2%QTR

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. DDNQ −3.9%. QTR −6.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DDNQ 0.79%
QTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
DDNQ $27M
QTR $9M
1Y total return
DDNQ No data
QTR +6.3%
Yield (12M)
DDNQ No data
QTR 17.60%
Holdings
DDNQ 4
QTR 105
Avg volume (30D)
DDNQ 14.2K sh, better
QTR 1.59K sh
NAV per share
DDNQ $19.36
QTR $31.60
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DDNQ: Cost 46, Risk 27, Mission 78, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. QTR: Cost 97, Risk 21, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 87, Durability 38.
Pillar letters and Scores for DDNQ, QTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDDNQQTR
Cost30% weightC46A97Higher
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightD27HigherF21
Tradability15% weightC46HigherD32
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA87
Durability5% weightD38D38

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DDNQ and QTR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

QTR ranks 2nd and DDNQ 10th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  4. Rank 9CQJUNFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - JuneScore 44
  5. Rank 10CDDNQInnovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 10CQSPTFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DDNQCInnovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF

QTRBGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

In short

DDNQ Most Nasdaq-100 buffer funds only cushion small drops. DDNQ is built to get paid for them: if its Nasdaq-100 reference dips within the 5% buffer, that decline can register as a positive return, with the upside capped and the terms reset each quarter.

QTR QTR owns the Nasdaq-100 and buys puts 10% below the index, so it wears the first leg of a selloff and passes the deep-drop risk to the options market. Insurance you pay for, not a capped buffer.

Stated mandate

DDNQ The Fund seeks capital appreciation through a defined-outcome strategy based on the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1. It seeks positive returns when the reference ETF rises or falls modestly, while applying an upside cap and a 5% loss buffer for larger declines.

QTR QTR seeks to buffer market selloffs through a protective-put strategy that owns Nasdaq-100 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts on the Nasdaq-100 Index. It aims to generally track the Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index's price and yield performance before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • DDNQ The dual directional twist: per the prospectus, a modest decline in the reference ETF can count as a positive return, up to the 5% buffer, instead of just being absorbed.innovatoretfs.com
  • Outcome periods run a quarter at a time, so cap and buffer terms are reset four times a year rather than locked in annually.innovatoretfs.com
  • Defined-outcome math inside a plain 1940 Act ETF on QQQ, not a bank-issued structured note.
  • The 0.79% expense ratio lands right at the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer funds, so the unusual payoff shape does not come with an above-group fee.
  • QTR Protection is bought outright rather than funded by selling upside calls, so the trade-off is the running cost of the puts instead of a ceiling on gains.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.25% a year, a fraction of the going rate in its Nasdaq-100 downside-protection peer group, where 0.50% (PGIM's Buffer 12 series) to 0.79% (QBUF) is typical.
  • The puts roll on the quarterly schedule set by its index, so there is no defined outcome period to time an entry around.
  • Holds the Nasdaq-100 stocks directly, roughly 100 names, and sits among the stronger implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • DDNQ The buffer is 5%, thin next to the 12% and full-protection options in the group. Past a 5% drop over the period, further losses pass through.
  • Upside is capped every period, and the cap is set anew at each reset, so a big Nasdaq-100 run gets clipped. The stated outcomes assume you hold a full period.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper ways into this cohort exist (PBQQ at 0.50%, the Calamos funds at 0.69%), and DDNQ launched in 2026, so it is early in building assets and trading depth.
  • QTR The puts sit 10% out of the money. The first 10% of an index drop is fully yours; the hedge only engages past that.
  • You pay put premiums whether or not markets fall, a standing cost that weighs on results in calm and rising markets.
  • A small fund that trades thinly next to the big buffer franchises, so spreads can run wider. Limit orders help.

Full DDNQ profile⁠

Full QTR profile⁠

DDNQ vs QTR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DDNQ vs QTR Cost

Overpaying DDNQ vs QTR

$10,015

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DDNQ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DDNQ 0.79%
  • QTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DDNQ $15,174QTR $5,159

Year by year

YearDDNQQTROverpaying
10$1,405$455$950
20$5,331$1,769$3,562
30$15,174$5,159$10,015

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%DDNQ
  • 0.25%QTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QTR cheapest of 12 funds

DDNQ 6th cheapest of 12 funds

DDNQ vs QTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
DDNQ No data
QTR 17.60%
Payout (12M)
DDNQ None
QTR $5.67
Last payment
DDNQ No data
QTR $0.04
Ex-dividend
DDNQ No data
QTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
DDNQ No data
QTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
DDNQ No data
QTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

DDNQAll DDNQ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll QTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.49; Jun 29, 2022 $0.03; Dec 29, 2022 $0.04; Jun 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.11; Jun 27, 2024 $0.06; Dec 30, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $5.63; Jun 29, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

DDNQ vs QTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DDNQ No dataQTR 16.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DDNQ No dataQTR 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DDNQ No dataQTR −31.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DDNQ 0.49QTR 1.16

DDNQ and QTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DDNQCvsPQAPB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQAPB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDNQCvsPQJAB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQJAB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDNQCvsPQOCB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQOCB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.