QTR ranks 2nd and DDNQ 10th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.
DDNQ vs QTR
QTR −0.54pt a year
0.79%0.25%
DDNQ 8.9×the volume
14.2K1.59K
DDNQ vs QTR Performance
−3.9%−6.2%
- DDNQ 0.79%
- QTR 0.25%, better
- DDNQ $27M
- QTR $9M
- DDNQ
- QTR +6.3%
- DDNQ
- QTR 17.60%
- DDNQ 4
- QTR 105
- DDNQ 14.2K sh, better
- QTR 1.59K sh
- DDNQ $19.36
- QTR $31.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDNQ | QTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | D27Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | C46Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | A87 | |
| Durability | D38 | D38 |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. DDNQ and QTR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDNQC
QTRB
In short
DDNQ Most Nasdaq-100 buffer funds only cushion small drops. DDNQ is built to get paid for them: if its Nasdaq-100 reference dips within the 5% buffer, that decline can register as a positive return, with the upside capped and the terms reset each quarter.
QTR QTR owns the Nasdaq-100 and buys puts 10% below the index, so it wears the first leg of a selloff and passes the deep-drop risk to the options market. Insurance you pay for, not a capped buffer.
Stated mandate
DDNQ The Fund seeks capital appreciation through a defined-outcome strategy based on the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1. It seeks positive returns when the reference ETF rises or falls modestly, while applying an upside cap and a 5% loss buffer for larger declines.
QTR QTR seeks to buffer market selloffs through a protective-put strategy that owns Nasdaq-100 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts on the Nasdaq-100 Index. It aims to generally track the Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index's price and yield performance before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDNQ vs QTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDNQ vs QTR Cost
Overpaying DDNQ vs QTR
$10,015
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDNQ 0.79%
$15,174
QTR 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDNQ | QTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $455 | $950 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $1,769 | $3,562 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $5,159 | $10,015 |
- 0.79%DDNQ
- 0.25%QTR, cheaper
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
QTR cheapest of 12 funds
DDNQ 6th cheapest of 12 funds
DDNQ vs QTR Dividends
- DDNQ
- QTR 17.60%
- DDNQ None
- QTR $5.67
- DDNQ
- QTR $0.04
- DDNQ
- QTR Jun 29, 2026
- DDNQ
- QTR Jul 2, 2026
- DDNQ
- QTR Twice a year
Distribution history
DDNQ vs QTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DDNQ QTR 16.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- DDNQ QTR 0.91
- Worst fall
- DDNQ QTR −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DDNQ 0.49QTR 1.16
DDNQ and QTR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
