Skip to content

DDNQ vs PQAP

Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF

DDNQCCboe

PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

PQAPBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

PQAP −0.29pt a year

DDNQ0.79%PQAP0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

DDNQ 2.3×the volume

DDNQ14.2KPQAP6.17K

DDNQ vs PQAP Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−3.9%DDNQ+0.3%PQAP

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. DDNQ −3.9%. PQAP +0.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−8%−6%−2%2%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DDNQ 0.79%
PQAP 0.50%, better
Fund size
DDNQ $27M
PQAP $32M
1Y total return
DDNQ No data
PQAP +15.6%
Holdings
DDNQ 4
PQAP 4
Avg volume (30D)
DDNQ 14.2K sh, better
PQAP 6.17K sh
NAV per share
DDNQ $19.36
PQAP $31.89
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DDNQ: Cost 46, Risk 27, Mission 78, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. PQAP: Cost 76, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 22, Holdings not scored, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for DDNQ, PQAP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDDNQPQAP
Cost30% weightC46A76Higher
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightD27A94Higher
Tradability15% weightC46HigherF22
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD38C49Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DDNQ and PQAP are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

PQAP ranks 1st and DDNQ 10th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 9CQJUNFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - JuneScore 44
  4. Rank 10CDDNQInnovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 10CQSPTFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DDNQCInnovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF

PQAPBPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

In short

DDNQ Most Nasdaq-100 buffer funds only cushion small drops. DDNQ is built to get paid for them: if its Nasdaq-100 reference dips within the 5% buffer, that decline can register as a positive return, with the upside capped and the terms reset each quarter.

PQAP A one-year cushion on the Nasdaq-100, with a bit more padding than the category norm: PQAP absorbs the first 12% of a QQQ drop over each period starting April 1, and charges 0.50% to do it.

Stated mandate

DDNQ The Fund seeks capital appreciation through a defined-outcome strategy based on the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1. It seeks positive returns when the reference ETF rises or falls modestly, while applying an upside cap and a 5% loss buffer for larger declines.

PQAP The Fund seeks to match QQQ’s price return up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 12% of QQQ losses over a one-year target outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • DDNQ The dual directional twist: per the prospectus, a modest decline in the reference ETF can count as a positive return, up to the 5% buffer, instead of just being absorbed.innovatoretfs.com
  • Outcome periods run a quarter at a time, so cap and buffer terms are reset four times a year rather than locked in annually.innovatoretfs.com
  • Defined-outcome math inside a plain 1940 Act ETF on QQQ, not a bank-issued structured note.
  • The 0.79% expense ratio lands right at the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer funds, so the unusual payoff shape does not come with an above-group fee.
  • PQAP The buffer runs 12 percentage points deep, versus the 10% cushion on the Innovator Nasdaq-100 buffer fund (QBUF) sitting in the same peer group.pgim.com
  • 0.50% a year undercuts the typical Nasdaq-100 buffer fund, including QBUF at 0.79%. In a strategy where the option budget sets your cap, fee drag matters.
  • April is one of four start months PGIM runs on this same 12% QQQ recipe (January, April, July, October), so entry points can be staggered instead of bunched.pgim.com
  • Mechanically clean build: FLEX options on QQQ itself, a stated one-year outcome period, and one of the stronger risk profiles among Nasdaq-100 buffer funds.

Worth knowing

  • DDNQ The buffer is 5%, thin next to the 12% and full-protection options in the group. Past a 5% drop over the period, further losses pass through.
  • Upside is capped every period, and the cap is set anew at each reset, so a big Nasdaq-100 run gets clipped. The stated outcomes assume you hold a full period.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper ways into this cohort exist (PBQQ at 0.50%, the Calamos funds at 0.69%), and DDNQ launched in 2026, so it is early in building assets and trading depth.
  • PQAP The upside cap is reset for each period and is unknown until it starts. Above it, QQQ's gains keep going without you.pgim.com
  • The 12% buffer is measured before fees and expenses and applies to holders across a full period. Buy mid-period and your own cushion and cap differ from the headline terms.pgim.com
  • Small and lightly traded next to the buffer giants, so spreads can be wider. It also launched in late 2024, giving it a short record.

Full DDNQ profile⁠

Full PQAP profile⁠

DDNQ vs PQAP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DDNQ vs PQAP Cost

Overpaying DDNQ vs PQAP

$5,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DDNQ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PQAP 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DDNQ 0.79%
  • PQAP 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DDNQ $15,174PQAP $9,979

Year by year

YearDDNQPQAPOverpaying
10$1,405$900$505
20$5,331$3,460$1,871
30$15,174$9,979$5,195

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%DDNQ
  • 0.50%PQAP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PQAP 2nd cheapest of 12 funds

DDNQ 6th cheapest of 12 funds

DDNQ vs PQAP Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
DDNQ None
PQAP No data
Last payment
DDNQ No data
PQAP $0.0049
Ex-dividend
DDNQ No data
PQAP Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
DDNQ No data
PQAP Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
DDNQ No data
PQAP Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

DDNQAll DDNQ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PQAPIrregular · 1 paymentAll PQAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.0049. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0052026YTD

DDNQ vs PQAP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DDNQ No dataPQAP 6.7%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DDNQ No dataPQAP 1.59since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DDNQ No dataPQAP −10.8%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DDNQ 0.49PQAP 0.44

Popular comparisons

  • DDNQCvsQTRB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQAPBvsQTRB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDNQCvsPQJAB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQAPBvsPQJAB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDNQCvsPQOCB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQAPBvsPQOCB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.