PQOC ranks 4th and DDNQ 10th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.
DDNQ vs PQOC
PQOC −0.29pt a year
0.79%0.50%
DDNQ 2.1×the volume
14.2K6.85K
DDNQ vs PQOC Performance
−3.9%−2.5%
- DDNQ 0.79%
- PQOC 0.50%, better
- DDNQ $27M
- PQOC $28M
- DDNQ
- PQOC +9.8%
- DDNQ 4
- PQOC 4
- DDNQ 14.2K sh, better
- PQOC 6.85K sh
- DDNQ $19.36
- PQOC $30.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDNQ | PQOC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D27 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | C46Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38 | C49Higher |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. DDNQ and PQOC are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDNQC
PQOCB
In short
DDNQ Most Nasdaq-100 buffer funds only cushion small drops. DDNQ is built to get paid for them: if its Nasdaq-100 reference dips within the 5% buffer, that decline can register as a positive return, with the upside capped and the terms reset each quarter.
PQOC Twelve points of downside cushion on the Nasdaq-100, reset every October. PGIM buffers the first 12% of a one-year loss on the big Nasdaq-100 ETF's own shares and caps the upside in exchange, for 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
DDNQ The Fund seeks capital appreciation through a defined-outcome strategy based on the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1. It seeks positive returns when the reference ETF rises or falls modestly, while applying an upside cap and a 5% loss buffer for larger declines.
PQOC The Fund seeks to track the price return of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 up to a cap while buffering the first 12% of losses during the one-year Target Outcome Period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDNQ vs PQOC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDNQ vs PQOC Cost
Overpaying DDNQ vs PQOC
$5,195
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDNQ 0.79%
$15,174
PQOC 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDNQ | PQOC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $900 | $505 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,460 | $1,871 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,979 | $5,195 |
- 0.79%DDNQ
- 0.50%PQOC, cheaper
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
PQOC 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
DDNQ 6th cheapest of 12 funds
DDNQ vs PQOC Dividends
- DDNQ None
- PQOC
- DDNQ
- PQOC $0.0013
- DDNQ
- PQOC Dec 30, 2025
- DDNQ
- PQOC Jan 2, 2026
- DDNQ
- PQOC Irregular
Distribution history
DDNQ vs PQOC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DDNQ PQOC 10.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- DDNQ PQOC 0.79
- Worst fall
- DDNQ PQOC −13.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DDNQ 0.49PQOC 0.76
DDNQ and PQOC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
