Skip to content

DDNQ vs PQOC

Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF

DDNQCCboe

PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

PQOCBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

PQOC −0.29pt a year

DDNQ0.79%PQOC0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

DDNQ 2.1×the volume

DDNQ14.2KPQOC6.85K

DDNQ vs PQOC Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−3.9%DDNQ−2.5%PQOC

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. DDNQ −3.9%. PQOC −2.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−7.5%0%2.5%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DDNQ 0.79%
PQOC 0.50%, better
Fund size
DDNQ $27M
PQOC $28M
1Y total return
DDNQ No data
PQOC +9.8%
Holdings
DDNQ 4
PQOC 4
Avg volume (30D)
DDNQ 14.2K sh, better
PQOC 6.85K sh
NAV per share
DDNQ $19.36
PQOC $30.19
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DDNQ: Cost 46, Risk 27, Mission 78, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. PQOC: Cost 76, Risk 48, Mission 94, Tradability 36, Holdings not scored, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for DDNQ, PQOC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDDNQPQOC
Cost30% weightC46A76Higher
Mission25% weightA78A94Higher
Risk15% weightD27C48Higher
Tradability15% weightC46HigherD36
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD38C49Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DDNQ and PQOC are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

PQOC ranks 4th and DDNQ 10th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  4. Rank 4BPQOCPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - OctoberScore 58
  5. Rank 5CQBUFInnovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 9CQJUNFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - JuneScore 44
  7. Rank 10CDDNQInnovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETFScore 40
  8. Rank 10CQSPTFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DDNQCInnovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF

PQOCBPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

In short

DDNQ Most Nasdaq-100 buffer funds only cushion small drops. DDNQ is built to get paid for them: if its Nasdaq-100 reference dips within the 5% buffer, that decline can register as a positive return, with the upside capped and the terms reset each quarter.

PQOC Twelve points of downside cushion on the Nasdaq-100, reset every October. PGIM buffers the first 12% of a one-year loss on the big Nasdaq-100 ETF's own shares and caps the upside in exchange, for 0.50% a year.

Stated mandate

DDNQ The Fund seeks capital appreciation through a defined-outcome strategy based on the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1. It seeks positive returns when the reference ETF rises or falls modestly, while applying an upside cap and a 5% loss buffer for larger declines.

PQOC The Fund seeks to track the price return of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 up to a cap while buffering the first 12% of losses during the one-year Target Outcome Period.

Why people hold it

  • DDNQ The dual directional twist: per the prospectus, a modest decline in the reference ETF can count as a positive return, up to the 5% buffer, instead of just being absorbed.innovatoretfs.com
  • Outcome periods run a quarter at a time, so cap and buffer terms are reset four times a year rather than locked in annually.innovatoretfs.com
  • Defined-outcome math inside a plain 1940 Act ETF on QQQ, not a bank-issued structured note.
  • The 0.79% expense ratio lands right at the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer funds, so the unusual payoff shape does not come with an above-group fee.
  • PQOC Twelve points of cushion, not ten, and the fee is 0.50% against the 0.79% Innovator charges on its 10-point Nasdaq-100 buffer fund (QBUF).
  • The reference is the shares of the Invesco QQQ Trust itself, not a custom index, so the thing being buffered is the Nasdaq-100 vehicle most investors already watch.
  • One of four PGIM siblings on a quarterly calendar (PQJA starts in January, PQAP in April), so the October reset window is a choice, not a leftover.
  • Priced below the typical shallow-buffer Nasdaq-100 fund, which matters in a structure where fees come straight out of a fixed pool of upside.

Worth knowing

  • DDNQ The buffer is 5%, thin next to the 12% and full-protection options in the group. Past a 5% drop over the period, further losses pass through.
  • Upside is capped every period, and the cap is set anew at each reset, so a big Nasdaq-100 run gets clipped. The stated outcomes assume you hold a full period.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper ways into this cohort exist (PBQQ at 0.50%, the Calamos funds at 0.69%), and DDNQ launched in 2026, so it is early in building assets and trading depth.
  • PQOC Upside is capped. A new ceiling gets set at the start of each October outcome period, and any Nasdaq-100 rally past it does not come through.
  • The 12% buffer is designed for the full October-to-September period. Enter or exit mid-stream and you own the options at whatever they are worth that day.
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on plain Nasdaq-100 funds.

Full DDNQ profile⁠

Full PQOC profile⁠

DDNQ vs PQOC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DDNQ vs PQOC Cost

Overpaying DDNQ vs PQOC

$5,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DDNQ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PQOC 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DDNQ 0.79%
  • PQOC 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DDNQ $15,174PQOC $9,979

Year by year

YearDDNQPQOCOverpaying
10$1,405$900$505
20$5,331$3,460$1,871
30$15,174$9,979$5,195

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%DDNQ
  • 0.50%PQOC, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PQOC 2nd cheapest of 12 funds

DDNQ 6th cheapest of 12 funds

DDNQ vs PQOC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
DDNQ None
PQOC No data
Last payment
DDNQ No data
PQOC $0.0013
Ex-dividend
DDNQ No data
PQOC Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
DDNQ No data
PQOC Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
DDNQ No data
PQOC Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

DDNQAll DDNQ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PQOCIrregular · 1 paymentAll PQOC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.0013. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0012026YTD

DDNQ vs PQOC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DDNQ No dataPQOC 10.5%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DDNQ No dataPQOC 0.79since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DDNQ No dataPQOC −13.7%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DDNQ 0.49PQOC 0.76

DDNQ and PQOC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DDNQCvsPQAPB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQOCBvsPQAPB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDNQCvsQTRB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQOCBvsQTRB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDNQCvsPQJAB

    Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQOCBvsPQJAB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.