DEM ranks 4th and SDEM 10th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Dividend Index Category.
DEM vs SDEM
DEM −0.03pt a year
0.63%0.66%
DEM 72.6×the volume
231K3.18K
DEM +5.4pt
+8.7%+3.3%
DEM vs SDEM Performance
+59.9%+33.2%
- DEM 0.63%, better
- SDEM 0.66%
- DEM $3.98B
- SDEM $43M
- DEM +18.6%, better
- SDEM +13.2%
- DEM 3.41%
- SDEM 5.28%, better
- DEM 559
- SDEM 58
- DEM 231K sh, better
- SDEM 3.18K sh
- DEM $52.83
- SDEM $31.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DEM | SDEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19Higher | F5 |
| Mission | A99Higher | A80 |
| Risk | B66Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | F14 |
| Holdings | B67Higher | C45 |
| Durability | A75Higher | D37 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DEM and SDEM are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DEMB
SDEMD
In short
DEM One of the original emerging-market dividend ETFs (2007). DEM ranks EM payers by yield, keeps only the top slice, then weights them by the actual dollars of dividends they pay. Income-first EM, not market-cap EM.
SDEM Most emerging-market dividend funds spread money across hundreds of names. SDEM goes the other way: roughly 50 of the highest-yielding stocks in EM, weighted equally, with cash paid out monthly. A concentrated, unapologetic yield hunt.
Stated mandate
DEM The fund seeks to track high-dividend-yielding companies in emerging markets and provides targeted emerging-market all-cap equity exposure.
SDEM The fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DEM vs SDEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DEM vs SDEM Cost
Overpaying SDEM vs DEM
$537
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DEM 0.63%
$12,359
SDEM 0.66%
$12,896
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DEM | SDEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $1,180 | $52 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $4,504 | $193 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $12,896 | $537 |
- 0.63%DEM, cheaper
- 0.66%SDEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.59%
DEM 8th cheapest of 10 funds
SDEM 10th cheapest of 10 funds
DEM vs SDEM Dividends
- DEM 3.41%
- SDEM 5.28%, better
- DEM $1.80
- SDEM $1.67
- DEM $0.77
- SDEM $0.14
- DEM Sep 25, 2026
- SDEM Oct 5, 2026
- DEM Sep 29, 2026
- SDEM Oct 13, 2026
- DEM Quarterly
- SDEM Monthly
Distribution history
DEM vs SDEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DEM
- SDEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DEM 10.0%, betterSDEM 11.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- DEM 1.29, betterSDEM 1.19
- Worst fall
- DEM −27.1%, betterSDEM −34.8%
- Market sensitivity
- DEM 0.73SDEM 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.