Skip to content

DEM vs SDEM

WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund

DEMBNYSE Arca

Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF

SDEMDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

DEM −0.03pt a year

DEM0.63%SDEM0.66%

Avg volume · 30D

DEM 72.6×the volume

DEM231KSDEM3.18K

10Y return · a year

DEM +5.4pt

DEM+8.7%SDEM+3.3%

DEM vs SDEM Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+59.9%DEM+33.2%SDEM

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. DEM +59.9%. SDEM +33.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DEM 0.63%, better
SDEM 0.66%
Fund size
DEM $3.98B
SDEM $43M
1Y total return
DEM +18.6%, better
SDEM +13.2%
Yield (12M)
DEM 3.41%
SDEM 5.28%, better
Holdings
DEM 559
SDEM 58
Avg volume (30D)
DEM 231K sh, better
SDEM 3.18K sh
NAV per share
DEM $52.83
SDEM $31.78
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DEM: Cost 19, Risk 66, Mission 99, Tradability 92, Holdings 67, Durability 75. SDEM: Cost 5, Risk 62, Mission 80, Tradability 14, Holdings 45, Durability 37.
Pillar letters and Scores for DEM, SDEM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDEMSDEM
Cost30% weightF19HigherF5
Mission25% weightA99HigherA80
Risk15% weightB66HigherB62
Tradability15% weightA92HigherF14
Holdings10% weightB67HigherC45
Durability5% weightA75HigherD37

Rank among Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DEM and SDEM are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 10 ›

DEM ranks 4th and SDEM 10th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Dividend Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AEDIVState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETFScore 71
  2. Rank 2ADVYEiShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BDIEMFranklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BDEMWisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend FundScore 64
  5. Rank 4BDGSWisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend FundScore 64
  6. Rank 9CEDOGALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 10DSDEMGlobal X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DEMBWisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund

SDEMDGlobal X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF

In short

DEM One of the original emerging-market dividend ETFs (2007). DEM ranks EM payers by yield, keeps only the top slice, then weights them by the actual dollars of dividends they pay. Income-first EM, not market-cap EM.

SDEM Most emerging-market dividend funds spread money across hundreds of names. SDEM goes the other way: roughly 50 of the highest-yielding stocks in EM, weighted equally, with cash paid out monthly. A concentrated, unapologetic yield hunt.

Stated mandate

DEM The fund seeks to track high-dividend-yielding companies in emerging markets and provides targeted emerging-market all-cap equity exposure.

SDEM The fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend Index.

Why people hold it

  • DEM Launched in 2007, it is one of the earliest EM high-dividend funds and has grown into a multi-billion-dollar portfolio spread across roughly 500 stocks.
  • Weights companies by the cash dividends they actually pay, so dividend dollars rather than market cap drive the portfolio, with weights reset at the annual screening.sec.gov
  • The screen is strict: only the highest-yielding 30% of WisdomTree's emerging-market dividend universe makes the index.sec.gov
  • Hugs its index closely and sits among the easier funds in its peer group to get in and out of.
  • SDEM The mandate is blunt and easy to check: track the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend Index, which screens the EM universe down to the 50 highest yielders and weights them equally rather than by size.globalxetfs.comusnews.com
  • Equal weighting keeps the usual EM index giants from dominating. Every name in the basket counts the same at rebalance, so the yield screen (not market cap) drives the portfolio.usnews.com
  • Distributions land monthly, not quarterly, and the fund has run this same strategy since its 2015 launch. Long track record, no strategy drift.
  • In practice it stays close to the index it advertises, which is what you want from a rules-based screen: the label and the holdings tell the same story.

Worth knowing

  • DEM At 0.63% a year it runs a touch above the typical fund in its peer group, and roughly triple index-tilt rival DIEM at 0.19%.
  • Buying dividend dollars pulls the basket toward the biggest payers in a handful of countries and sectors; the index applies country and sector caps at each annual screening.sec.gov
  • Payouts arrive quarterly and move with emerging-market dividends and currencies; a company paying today can stop paying tomorrow.wisdomtree.com
  • SDEM At 0.66% a year, it costs more than the EM dividend median and well more than cheaper options like DIEM (0.19%) and EDIV (0.49%). You pay up for the concentrated screen.
  • Small fund, thin volume. Spreads can be wider than in the big EM dividend names, so limit orders matter more here than with a heavily traded peer.
  • Chasing the top 50 yielders concentrates the portfolio in whichever countries and sectors are cheap at rebalance, and high yields sometimes signal stress rather than strength.globalxetfs.com

Full DEM profile⁠

Full SDEM profile⁠

DEM vs SDEM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DEM vs SDEM Cost

Overpaying SDEM vs DEM

$537

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DEM 0.63%

    $12,359

  • SDEM 0.66%

    $12,896

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DEM 0.63%
  • SDEM 0.66%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SDEM $12,896DEM $12,359

Year by year

YearDEMSDEMOverpaying
10$1,128$1,180$52
20$4,311$4,504$193
30$12,359$12,896$537

Expense ratio

  • 0.63%DEM, cheaper
  • 0.66%SDEM
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds
  • Median 0.59%

DEM 8th cheapest of 10 funds

SDEM 10th cheapest of 10 funds

DEM vs SDEM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
DEM 3.41%
SDEM 5.28%, better
Payout (12M)
DEM $1.80
SDEM $1.67
Last payment
DEM $0.77
SDEM $0.14
Ex-dividend
DEM Sep 25, 2026
SDEM Oct 5, 2026
Paid on
DEM Sep 29, 2026
SDEM Oct 13, 2026
Frequency
DEM Quarterly
SDEM Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

DEMQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll DEM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 27, 2023 $0.10; Jun 26, 2023 $0.72; Sep 25, 2023 $1.10; Dec 22, 2023 $0.32; Mar 22, 2024 $0.23; Jun 25, 2024 $0.64; Sep 25, 2024 $1.06; Dec 26, 2024 $0.20; Mar 26, 2025 $0.42; Jun 25, 2025 $0.58; Sep 25, 2025 $0.80; Dec 31, 2025 $0.07; Mar 26, 2026 $0.24; Jun 25, 2026 $0.73; Sep 25, 2026 $0.77. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
SDEMMonthly · 45 paymentsAll SDEM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 45 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Feb 3, 2023 $0.15; Mar 3, 2023 $0.15; Apr 5, 2023 $0.15; May 3, 2023 $0.15; Jun 5, 2023 $0.15; Jul 6, 2023 $0.15; Aug 3, 2023 $0.16; Sep 6, 2023 $0.16; Oct 4, 2023 $0.16; Nov 3, 2023 $0.16; Dec 5, 2023 $0.16; Dec 28, 2023 $0.16; Feb 5, 2024 $0.16; Mar 5, 2024 $0.16; Apr 3, 2024 $0.15; May 3, 2024 $0.15; Jun 5, 2024 $0.15; Jul 3, 2024 $0.15; Aug 5, 2024 $0.14; Sep 5, 2024 $0.14; Oct 3, 2024 $0.14; Nov 5, 2024 $0.15; Dec 4, 2024 $0.15; Dec 30, 2024 $0.15; Feb 5, 2025 $0.14; Mar 5, 2025 $0.13; Apr 3, 2025 $0.13; May 5, 2025 $0.13; Jun 4, 2025 $0.13; Jul 3, 2025 $0.13; Aug 5, 2025 $0.13; Sep 4, 2025 $0.13; Oct 3, 2025 $0.13; Nov 5, 2025 $0.13; Dec 3, 2025 $0.14; Dec 30, 2025 $0.14; Feb 4, 2026 $0.14; Mar 4, 2026 $0.14; Apr 6, 2026 $0.14; May 5, 2026 $0.14; Jun 3, 2026 $0.14; Jul 6, 2026 $0.14; Aug 5, 2026 $0.14; Sep 3, 2026 $0.14; Oct 5, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD

DEM vs SDEM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DEM
  • SDEM
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: SDEM −34.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DEM 10.0%, betterSDEM 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DEM 1.29, betterSDEM 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DEM −27.1%, betterSDEM −34.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DEM 0.73SDEM 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • DEMBvsEDIVA

    WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund · State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SDEMDvsEDIVA

    Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DEMBvsDVYEA

    WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund · iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SDEMDvsDVYEA

    Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DEMBvsDIEMB

    WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund · Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SDEMDvsDIEMB

    Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF · Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.