SMH ranks 2nd and DRAM 12th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.
DRAM vs SMH
SMH −0.30pt a year
0.65%0.35%
DRAM 5.4×the volume
49.2M9.16M
DRAM vs SMH Performance
−4.7%−3.3%
- DRAM 0.65%
- SMH 0.35%, better
- DRAM $19B
- SMH $66.4B
- DRAM
- SMH +44.4%
- DRAM
- SMH 0.21%
- DRAM 23
- SMH 27
- DRAM 49.2M sh, better
- SMH 9.16M sh
- DRAM $49.23
- SMH $522.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DRAM | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | C42 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | F21 | B60Higher |
| Durability | A77 | A92Higher |
Rank among Semiconductors funds
Same Category. DRAM and SMH are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DRAMC
SMHA
In short
DRAM Most chip ETFs own memory in passing. DRAM makes it the whole point: an actively managed, global basket of companies that earn at least half their money from memory technology like HBM, DRAM and NAND.
SMH Chip exposure, undiluted. SMH tracks roughly 25 of the largest, most liquid US-listed semiconductor names (foreign chipmakers included) and trades like a household ticker in its category.
Stated mandate
DRAM DRAM is an actively managed ETF investing primarily in equity securities of memory companies. Eligible companies derive at least half of their revenues or profits from semiconductor memory technologies such as HBM, DRAM, NAND, NOR, HDD, or specialty and embedded memory.
SMH The Fund aims to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DRAM vs SMH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DRAM vs SMH Cost
Overpaying DRAM vs SMH
$5,591
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DRAM 0.65%
$12,717
SMH 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DRAM | SMH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $634 | $529 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,454 | $1,986 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $7,126 | $5,591 |
- 0.65%DRAM
- 0.35%SMH, cheaper
- Middle half of Semiconductors funds
- Median 0.60%
SMH 6th cheapest of 25 funds
DRAM 14th cheapest of 25 funds
DRAM vs SMH Dividends
- DRAM
- SMH 0.21%
- DRAM None
- SMH $1.10
- DRAM
- SMH $1.10
- DRAM
- SMH Dec 22, 2025
- DRAM
- SMH Dec 26, 2025
- DRAM
- SMH Annual
Distribution history
DRAM vs SMH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DRAM SMH 33.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- DRAM SMH 1.37
- Worst fall
- DRAM SMH −45.3%
- Market sensitivity
- DRAM 9.20SMH 1.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




