SOXQ ranks 1st and DRAM 12th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.
DRAM vs SOXQ
SOXQ −0.46pt a year
0.65%0.19%
DRAM 27.4×the volume
49.2M1.8M
DRAM vs SOXQ Performance
−4.7%−5.5%
- DRAM 0.65%
- SOXQ 0.19%, better
- DRAM $19B
- SOXQ $2.76B
- DRAM
- SOXQ +48.4%
- DRAM
- SOXQ 0.35%
- DRAM 23
- SOXQ 32
- DRAM 49.2M sh, better
- SOXQ 1.8M sh
- DRAM $49.23
- SOXQ $84.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DRAM | SOXQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A92Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | F21 | A79Higher |
| Durability | A77 | A83Higher |
Rank among Semiconductors funds
Same Category. DRAM and SOXQ are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DRAMC
SOXQA
In short
DRAM Most chip ETFs own memory in passing. DRAM makes it the whole point: an actively managed, global basket of companies that earn at least half their money from memory technology like HBM, DRAM and NAND.
SOXQ SOXQ owns the semiconductor industry's landmark benchmark, the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, for 0.19% a year. About 30 US-listed chip names, at roughly half the fee of the typical semiconductor fund.
Stated mandate
DRAM DRAM is an actively managed ETF investing primarily in equity securities of memory companies. Eligible companies derive at least half of their revenues or profits from semiconductor memory technologies such as HBM, DRAM, NAND, NOR, HDD, or specialty and embedded memory.
SOXQ The Fund seeks to track the investment results, before fees and expenses, of the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DRAM vs SOXQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DRAM vs SOXQ Cost
Overpaying DRAM vs SOXQ
$8,765
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DRAM 0.65%
$12,717
SOXQ 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DRAM | SOXQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $347 | $816 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,351 | $3,089 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,952 | $8,765 |
- 0.65%DRAM
- 0.19%SOXQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Semiconductors funds
- Median 0.60%
SOXQ 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
DRAM 14th cheapest of 25 funds
DRAM vs SOXQ Dividends
- DRAM
- SOXQ 0.35%
- DRAM None
- SOXQ $0.29
- DRAM
- SOXQ $0.08
- DRAM
- SOXQ Sep 21, 2026
- DRAM
- SOXQ Sep 25, 2026
- DRAM
- SOXQ Quarterly
Distribution history
DRAM vs SOXQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DRAM SOXQ 37.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- DRAM SOXQ 1.15
- Worst fall
- DRAM SOXQ −46.0%
- Market sensitivity
- DRAM 9.20SOXQ 2.19
DRAM and SOXQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





