FAS ranks 2nd and DUSL 15th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
DUSL vs FAS
FAS −0.09pt a year
0.97%0.88%
FAS 30.7×the volume
13.3K408K
DUSL +6.0pt
+14.6%+8.6%
DUSL vs FAS Performance
+97.9%+51.0%
- DUSL 0.97%
- FAS 0.88%, better
- DUSL $40M
- FAS $2.06B
- DUSL +17.0%
- FAS +27.3%, better
- DUSL 9.88%, better
- FAS 7.80%
- DUSL 91
- FAS 88
- DUSL 13.3K sh
- FAS 408K sh, better
- DUSL $73.60
- FAS $164.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DUSL | FAS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A92Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A73Higher | B69 |
| Tradability | C41 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D33 | B66Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. DUSL and FAS are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DUSLC
FASA
In short
DUSL Triple-leveraged exposure to the least glamorous corner of the market. DUSL aims to deliver 3x the daily move of the Industrials Select Sector Index, and it resets that target every day. Running since 2017.
FAS Born in November 2008 with the banking system on fire, FAS aims to deliver three times the daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A one-day tool on roughly 80 financial stocks, built around a single-day objective.
Stated mandate
DUSL The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the Industrials Select Sector Index.
FAS The fund seeks a daily return equal to three times the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a single-day objective rather than a multiple of the index’s cumulative return over longer periods.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DUSL vs FAS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DUSL vs FAS Cost
Overpaying DUSL vs FAS
$1,493
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DUSL 0.97%
$18,198
FAS 0.88%
$16,705
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DUSL | FAS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,559 | $153 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,891 | $552 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $16,705 | $1,493 |
- 0.97%DUSL
- 0.88%FAS, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
FAS 4th cheapest of 30 funds
DUSL 16th cheapest of 30 funds
DUSL vs FAS Dividends
- DUSL 9.88%, better
- FAS 7.80%
- DUSL $7.51
- FAS $14.62
- DUSL $0.0083
- FAS $1.00
- DUSL Sep 22, 2026
- FAS Sep 22, 2026
- DUSL Sep 29, 2026
- FAS Sep 29, 2026
- DUSL Quarterly
- FAS Quarterly
Distribution history
DUSL vs FAS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DUSL
- FAS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DUSL 48.6%FAS 46.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DUSL 0.93FAS 1.03, better
- Worst fall
- DUSL −58.4%, betterFAS −66.9%
- Market sensitivity
- DUSL 2.77FAS 2.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.