FLCH ranks 2nd and ECNS 8th of 28 funds in the China Category.
ECNS vs FLCH
FLCH −0.40pt a year
0.59%0.19%
FLCH 11.4×the volume
9.51K108K
FLCH +3.8pt
−7.9%−4.1%
ECNS vs FLCH Performance
−33.6%−18.7%
- ECNS 0.59%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- ECNS $56M
- FLCH $252M
- ECNS −25.7%
- FLCH −20.9%, better
- ECNS 7.46%, better
- FLCH 2.63%
- ECNS 254
- FLCH 1112
- ECNS 9.51K sh
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- ECNS $25.30
- FLCH $19.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ECNS | FLCH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A74 | A87Higher |
| Risk | C42 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | F23 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A70 | A70 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. ECNS and FLCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ECNSB
FLCHA
In short
ECNS Most US-listed China funds fish in large-cap waters. ECNS works the other end of the market: an index of small-cap Chinese equities, roughly 300 of them, from iShares, running since 2010.
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
Stated mandate
ECNS The fund seeks to track an index composed of small-cap Chinese equities.
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ECNS vs FLCH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ECNS vs FLCH Cost
Overpaying ECNS vs FLCH
$7,683
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ECNS 0.59%
$11,635
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ECNS | FLCH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $347 | $711 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $1,351 | $2,700 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $3,952 | $7,683 |
- 0.59%ECNS
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
ECNS 5th cheapest of 28 funds
ECNS vs FLCH Dividends
- ECNS 7.46%, better
- FLCH 2.63%
- ECNS $1.90
- FLCH $0.51
- ECNS $0.45
- FLCH $0.14
- ECNS Jun 15, 2026
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- ECNS Jun 18, 2026
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- ECNS Twice a year
- FLCH Twice a year
Distribution history
ECNS vs FLCH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ECNS
- FLCH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ECNS 26.0%FLCH 21.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ECNS 0.11FLCH 0.29, better
- Worst fall
- ECNS −55.6%FLCH −48.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ECNS 0.81FLCH 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.