MCHI ranks 3rd and ECNS 8th of 28 funds in the China Category.
ECNS vs MCHI
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.59%0.59%
MCHI 235.1×the volume
9.51K2.24M
MCHI +3.2pt
−0.9%+2.3%
ECNS vs MCHI Performance
−33.6%−20.6%
- ECNS 0.59%
- MCHI 0.59%
- ECNS $56M
- MCHI $5.49B
- ECNS −25.7%
- MCHI −21.3%, better
- ECNS 7.46%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- ECNS 254
- MCHI 581
- ECNS 9.51K sh
- MCHI 2.24M sh, better
- ECNS $25.30
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ECNS | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A78 |
| Mission | A74 | A87Higher |
| Risk | C42 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | F23 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | B58 |
| Durability | A70 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. ECNS and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ECNSB
MCHIA
In short
ECNS Most US-listed China funds fish in large-cap waters. ECNS works the other end of the market: an index of small-cap Chinese equities, roughly 300 of them, from iShares, running since 2010.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
ECNS The fund seeks to track an index composed of small-cap Chinese equities.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ECNS vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ECNS vs MCHI Cost
Same expense ratio
$11,635
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ECNS 0.59%
$11,635
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ECNS | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,058 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $4,051 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $11,635 |
- 0.59%ECNS
- 0.59%MCHI
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
ECNS 5th cheapest of 28 funds
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
ECNS vs MCHI Dividends
- ECNS 7.46%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- ECNS $1.90
- MCHI $1.10
- ECNS $0.45
- MCHI $0.36
- ECNS Jun 15, 2026
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- ECNS Jun 18, 2026
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- ECNS Twice a year
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
ECNS vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ECNS
- MCHI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ECNS 26.0%MCHI 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ECNS 0.11MCHI 0.26, better
- Worst fall
- ECNS −55.6%MCHI −49.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ECNS 0.81MCHI 0.63
ECNS and MCHI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





