CXSE ranks 1st and ECNS 8th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CXSE vs ECNS
CXSE −0.27pt a year
0.32%0.59%
CXSE 3.9×the volume
37.2K9.51K
CXSE +4.0pt
+3.1%−0.9%
CXSE vs ECNS Performance
−39.0%−33.6%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- ECNS 0.59%
- CXSE $372M
- ECNS $56M
- CXSE −24.9%, better
- ECNS −25.7%
- CXSE 2.22%
- ECNS 7.46%, better
- CXSE 241
- ECNS 254
- CXSE 37.2K sh, better
- ECNS 9.51K sh
- CXSE $31.37
- ECNS $25.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CXSE | ECNS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A74 |
| Risk | C47Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | A74 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A79Higher | A70 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CXSE and ECNS are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CXSEA
ECNSB
In short
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
ECNS Most US-listed China funds fish in large-cap waters. ECNS works the other end of the market: an index of small-cap Chinese equities, roughly 300 of them, from iShares, running since 2010.
Stated mandate
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
ECNS The fund seeks to track an index composed of small-cap Chinese equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CXSE vs ECNS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CXSE vs ECNS Cost
Overpaying ECNS vs CXSE
$5,093
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
ECNS 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CXSE | ECNS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $1,058 | $478 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $4,051 | $1,801 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $11,635 | $5,093 |
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- 0.59%ECNS
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
ECNS 5th cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE vs ECNS Dividends
- CXSE 2.22%
- ECNS 7.46%, better
- CXSE $0.69
- ECNS $1.90
- CXSE $0.26
- ECNS $0.45
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- ECNS Jun 15, 2026
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- ECNS Jun 18, 2026
- CXSE Quarterly
- ECNS Twice a year
Distribution history
CXSE vs ECNS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CXSE
- ECNS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CXSE 24.9%, betterECNS 26.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CXSE 0.12, betterECNS 0.11
- Worst fall
- CXSE −57.6%ECNS −55.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CXSE 0.75ECNS 0.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.