QLD ranks 1st and EET 16th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
EET vs QLD
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.95%0.89%
QLD 433.3×the volume
9.57K4.15M
QLD +26.2pt
+5.7%+31.9%
EET vs QLD Performance
+8.4%+97.9%
- EET 0.95%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- EET $31M
- QLD $13.3B
- EET +11.6%, better
- QLD +10.7%
- EET 1.96%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- EET 2
- QLD 113
- EET 9.57K sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- EET $89.41
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EET | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B59 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | D31 | A72Higher |
| Durability | B69 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EET and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EETB
QLDA
In short
EET Leverage, pointed away from America. EET aims for twice the daily move of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, a rare broad-EM target in a leveraged-bull field stacked with US tech and sector plays.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
EET The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to twice the daily performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EET vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EET vs QLD Cost
Overpaying EET vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EET 0.95%
$17,869
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EET | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,576 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $5,953 | $369 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $16,872 | $997 |
- 0.95%EET
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
EET 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
EET vs QLD Dividends
- EET 1.96%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- EET $1.75
- QLD $0.12
- EET $0.47
- QLD $0.03
- EET Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- EET Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- EET Quarterly
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
EET vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EET
- QLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EET 32.7%, betterQLD 36.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- EET 0.88QLD 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- EET −59.0%, betterQLD −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EET 1.67QLD 2.46
EET and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
